An Inspector Calls: Context (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
Written by: Nick Redgrove
Reviewed by: Kate Lee
Context
Context should inform, but should never dominate, your reading of the play. Any comments on contextual factors must always be linked to the ideas in the play. When exploring the context in which An Inspector Calls was written, you should consider:
The contexts in which the text is set
The contexts in which the text is received
Its literary context (genre)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Priestley wrote An Inspector Calls in 1945 but chose to set the play in 1912. British society changed significantly between those two periods and so both have significant political as well as societal differences. While An Inspector Calls carries a mark of its time, you should try to consider what the text has to say about people, human nature, societal structures etc. and recognise these as universal themes, which are just as relevant today.
For example, if you were to write about the character of Eva Smith as a working-class woman in 1912, you may also wish to consider today’s society and consider how much has (or has not) changed.
Each of the below topics links directly to Priestley’s ideas in An Inspector Calls:
Capitalism and socialism
Within the play, two opposing political, economic and social schools of thought are presented:
Capitalism is presented as a system in which abuse and exploitation of the poor and disadvantaged are inevitable
Socialism is presented as a system which promotes equality and views society as a whole
In 1912, England was governed by a conservative right-wing government where capitalism was the dominant theory of the day:
By 1945, a left-wing government had just been elected which advocated more socialist values and ideals:
The Labour Party envisaged a society in which all citizens would be free from the fear of poverty
By setting the play in this period, Priestley aims to show capitalism to be a morally unacceptable political view:
Socialism emerged in the 1940s in an attempt to find a more humane economic system than capitalism
In 1912 workers had little or no rights and were largely unprotected by unions and a developed Welfare State, leaving them vulnerable and subject to exploitation:
While social welfare reforms began to evolve in the 1900s in England, it was the introduction of the Welfare State in the 1940s, which provided much greater protection for the social and economic welfare of citizens
World War II had decimated towns and cities in England and issues such as healthcare, housing, education, and employment benefits were viewed as essential policies
By 1945, workers’ rights had been marginally improved:
Socialism is depicted as an instrument of the labour movement, making it more responsive to worker’s needs
Priestley illustrates the vulnerability of workers when Eva is dismissed for her participation in a pay strike:
He tries to convey the importance that all workers should be protected from unfair dismissal
Work in industrial factories in 1912 would have been very difficult and demanding work, often with very poor working conditions:
Having Eva work in a factory makes her character appear even more sympathetic to the audience
Responsibility
In 1912, little social provision for the poor meant financial assistance became the responsibility of charities:
Priestley shows how Eva is forced to apply to Sybil’s charity for help, which meant that the upper classes could decide who was deserving of their assistance
Priestley depicts the failures of charity in dealing with the problems of poverty:
Priestley attempts to illustrate how unfair the system was and to highlight the need for government intervention
Through the Inspector, Priestley argues that members of a society have duties and obligations towards the welfare of others
In contrast, by 1945 there was a greater desire for social reform:
A series of social welfare policies were introduced between 1945-1951, so that the vulnerable in society would be offered some protection
The 1942 Beveridge Report advocated a system of social insurance for every citizen regardless of income, for example, the Family Allowances Act 1945, National Health Service Act 1946
By setting the play in 1912, Priestley is able to convey Eva’s destitution in a bleaker way:
If the play had been set in 1945, Eva would have been afforded much more protection under the Welfare State
This further highlights the play’s message of the importance of government intervention and collective and social responsibility
Class
The hierarchical class system was very dominant in Edwardian society
At the start of the 20th century, British society was broadly divided into three classes: upper, middle class and the working class:
After two World Wars, this system was no longer viewed as the only possible societal structure
The Great Depression (1929-1939) resulted in economic depression and mass unemployment throughout the world:
The majority of British people, especially the working class, demanded social change
Priestley is concerned to show the social extremes of the class system:
Priestley uses the Birlings and Gerald Croft as representations of the upper classes, and Eva as a representation of the working class to highlight the immense differences between them and the unfairness of the system
The Birlings’ home and lifestyle are sharply contrasted with descriptions of the workers in Arthur’s factory and Eva’s poverty
The play is set two years before World War I and was written when World War II ended:
By 1945, two world wars had dramatically altered views about class
Gender
In 1912, women were largely seen to be subservient to men and had significantly fewer rights
During this period, the suffragette movement campaigned for gender equality for women:
It was an increasing time of political agitation for women’s rights
Priestley demonstrates how women, especially working-class women, could be exploited and abused by those with wealth and power:
Both Gerald and Eric abuse their power and status in their relationship with Eva and both men discard her when it suits them
As a woman, Eva would have been viewed as ‘cheap labour’ and therefore more at risk of being exploited and abused by employers because of her gender:
Working-class women would have been one of the cheapest forms of labour available to wealthy business owners like Arthur Birling
The growing agitation for gender equality is evident through the character of Sheila and she can be viewed as a woman attempting to redefine the role of women at a time when women’s rights were being sought:
At the beginning of the play, she plays a typical role within her patriarchal society and is obedient to her father
This can be contrasted to her behaviour as the play develops and she begins to challenge her father and refuses to take back Gerald’s engagement ring
In contrast, Sheila uses her position to get another woman fired from her position, during a period when women were fighting to have greater recognition in the workplace:
Sheila belongs to a class where women would never be expected to provide for themselves
Unmarried pregnant women would have been heavily ostracised by society in 1912
By 1945, there would still have been significant stigma attached to Eva’s pregnancy
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?