Poppies (AQA GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
Each poetry anthology at GCSE contains 15 poems, and in your exam question you will be given one poem - printed in full - and asked to compare this printed poem to another. As this is a closed-book exam, you will not have access to the second poem, so you will have to know it from memory. Fifteen poems are a lot to revise. However, understanding four things will enable you to produce a top-grade response:
The meaning of the poem
The ideas and messages of the poet
How the poet conveys these ideas through their methods
How do these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas of other poets in the anthology
Below is a guide to Jane Weir’s poem Poppies, from the Power and Conflict anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
A ‘translation’ of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Weir’s intention and message
Poppies in a nutshell
Poppies was written by the poet Jane Weir in 2005 when Carol Ann Duffy asked Jane Weir and other poets to compose poems which would raise awareness of the sacrifices made by British soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. Weir’s poem Poppies presents the sacrifice made by families involved in war, to raise awareness of the wide-reaching impact of conflict.
Poppies breakdown
Lines 1-2
“Three days before Armistice Sunday
and poppies had already been placed”
Translation
The poem begins reporting an event
The mention of Armistice Sunday raises themes of conflict and remembrance of peace
Poppies are used to remember the day peace was declared at the end of World War I
Weir’s intention
Weir chose to write a poem which details the remembrance of soldiers whose lives have been lost in war, in order to raise awareness of their sacrifice
She begins the poem using reported speech to alert readers to the theme of conflict and remembrance: her poem focuses on remembering those who fell in battle
Lines 3-6
“on individual war graves. Before you left,
I pinned one onto your lapel, crimped petals,
spasms of paper red, disrupting a blockade
of yellow bias binding around your blazer.”
Translation
Weir refers to an event of commemoration; here she highlights the image of each soldier’s grave
The theme of remembrance is continued as the speaker reflects on the day their loved one left for war, describing in vivid detail their memory of pinning a poppy on his collar
Weir’s intention
Weir’s speaker addresses the son directly: the change in tone moves from the generic to the personal to highlight how war affects individuals
Weir’s first-person voice conveys the perspective of the loved ones of fallen soldiers:
This raises awareness of the consequences of war for those left behind
Weir brings to life a childhood moment to convey the intimacy of the relationship
Lines 7-9
“Sellotape bandaged around my hand,
I rounded up as many white cat hairs
as I could, smoothed down your shirt's”
Translation
The speaker remembers little details which reflect typical behaviour between a parent and child
The reference to mundane, familiar activities (here, cleaning a jacket of cat hairs) help a reader relate, remembering similar intimate moments of their own
Weir’s intention
Remembering childhood moments before the child grew up and went off to war, evokes a feeling of sentimentality and nostalgia associated with remembrance
The poem narrates past, familiar memories in order to show personal loss after a soldier’s death:
This illustrates the impact of war as individual, yet wide-reaching
Lines 10-14
“Upturned collar, steeled the softening
of my face. I wanted to graze my nose
across the tip of your nose, play at
being Eskimos like we did when
you were little. I resisted the impulse”
Translation
Here, the speaker hides powerful emotion: “steel the softening”:
To “steel” yourself is to make yourself strong and determined against a challenge
“Softening” refers to tender emotion
The poem refers to a personal and physical moment shared when the son was young:
An Eskimo kiss is an endearing term used to describe touching noses
The speaker refers to the need to contain their emotion, presumably as the son is now grown up: “resisting the impulses”
Weir’s intention
The lines convey a tone of nostalgia in an emotional, free-flowing memory
The speaker indicates the tension of the parent containing their emotion with the words “steeled” and “softening”:
Here, Weir alludes to the powerlessness of parents after a son’s death in conflict
This suggests the parent’s desire to protect their child from the parent’s pain, alluding to self-sacrifice made by parents during war
The speaker remembers physical moments of love and intimacy:
This evokes images of childhood, evoking empathy
Lines 15-18
“to run my fingers through the gelled
blackthorns of your hair. All my words
flattened, rolled, turned into felt,
slowly melting. I was brave, as I walked”
Translation
The speaker refers to missing physical moments between parent and child
The speaker refers, symbolically, to their past words as’ folded up’, compressed
The speaker describes the son’s childhood as “melting” and disappearing as he leaves
Weir’s intention
These lines present a sense of the parent’s powerlessness when their son is gone:
Their past words are compared with the material being flattened and rolled up, suggesting they are no longer necessary
Weir uses the adjective “brave” to show the challenge of letting a son go:
This subverts the stereotypical image of a brave soldier by describing a brave parent, thus showing a different perspective
Lines 19-22
“with you, to the front door, threw
it open, the world overflowing
like a treasure chest. A split second
and you were away, intoxicated”
Translation
The speaker describes the emotional and dramatic moment when the son leaves
The speaker uses the image of a treasure chest to indicate the son’s hope for adventure
The word “intoxicated” has a double meaning:
Intoxicated by war could suggest patriotism is poisonous
It could refer, too, to the son’s excitement to leave
This links with “split second” showing the son’s desperation to go
Weir’s intention
These lines depict the exuberance and pace of the moment the son leaves
Weir shows the innocent excitement of the soldier:
Here, Weir may be implying patriotism is a naive concept
Weir compares the way the son sees his future with a treasure chest:
This reflects the son’s attitude, not the parent’s, highlighting the opposing experiences of the parent and the child
Here, Weir could be making a veiled critique of war propaganda on youth
Lines 23 - 26
“After you'd gone I went into your bedroom,
released a song bird from its cage.
Later a single dove flew from the pear tree,
and this is where it has led me”
Translation
The speaker uses a metaphor of a dove released to symbolise letting go of the son
The speaker explains that the “dove”, representing the son, led them to the graveyard
Weir’s intention
The poem separates here with a full-stop to divide the ‘before’ and the ‘after’ of life with their son:
This suggests the parent’s life changed definitively after the son’s death
The metaphor of a dove alludes to peace, perhaps signifying the parent’s hope for peace, and that the son would return
The image of a dove released from a cage connotes to the parent’s need to let the son go, suggesting the individual agony of a soldier’s parent
Weir gives an implicit message about war, showing a parent hoping for peace
Lines 27 - 29
“skirting the church yard walls, my stomach busy
making tucks, darts, pleats, hat-less, without
a winter coat or reinforcements of scarf, gloves,”
Translation
The poet continues the semantic field of clothes-making to compare it with parenthood, perhaps related to the forming of something new
The speaker describes the unsettling, physical feelings in their stomach, metaphorically comparing it to folding material
The poet mentions a lack of warm clothing using a military term “reinforcements”: this term refers to back-up personnel sent to increase the strength of an army
Weir’s intention
The disrupted rhythm creates an unsettled tone, signifying the parent’s emotions:
This conveys Weir’s message about the impact of grief on soldier’s parents
The list relating to clothing suggests a sense of being overwhelmed by the physical discomfort of grief:
The words “tucks, darts, pleats” connote to the containment of material
The speaker’s use of military terminology ironically implies the parent’s lack of strength and support without the son, applying ideas of military strength to a parent
Lines 30-32
“On reaching the top of the hill I traced
the inscriptions on the war memorial,
leaned against it like a wishbone.”
Translation
The poet persona narrates a sensory experience at the graveyard
The speaker compares the way they lean against the memorial to a wishbone, which is known for its connections with good luck
Weir’s intention
The speaker uses evocative imagery to highlight the commemoration of soldiers:
This evokes empathy, in order to raise awareness of parental grief caused by conflict
The speaker compares the bent body to a curved bone symbolising good luck:
Weir shows the parent’s physical pain and frustrated wish
The ironic use of a symbol connected with luck suggest a cynical tone
Lines 33-35
“The dove pulled freely against the sky,
an ornamental stitch, I listened, hoping to hear
your playground voice catching on the wind.”
Translation
The speaker uses the image of a stitch coming loose to symbolise how the image of their son is coming apart in their mind
The speaker listens for his voice, remembering him as a child
Weir’s intention
Weir’s metaphorical description of a stitch coming loose continues the semantic field of clothes-making used throughout to symbolise parenthood:
This conveys the parent’s feelings of loss and frustration, perhaps that her son died without reaching his potential
Weir leaves the parent stuck in the past, unable to resolve the grief:
This ends the poem with a lack of resolution, and suggests the parent will always mourn their son
Weir alludes to the inevitability of war, and of the resulting grief
Writer’s Methods
Although this section is organised into three separate sections - form, structure and language - it is always best to move from what the poet is presenting (the techniques they use; the overall form of the poem; what comes at the beginning, middle and end of a poem) to how and why they have made the choices they have.
Focusing on the poet’s overarching ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. Crucially, in the below sections, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes ’s intentions behind his choices in terms of:
Form
The poem is a free-verse, first-person dramatic monologue. The speaker, the parent, uses a second person narrative to directly address their son, in order to depict the speaker’s personal experience of grief and highlight a different perspective on conflict.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Remembrance | A dramatic monologue typically takes on the emotional speech of a character, sometimes addressing a listener. Here, the listener is the dead son | The emotive monologue conveys the parent’s grief remembering their son |
This offers a different perspective on conflict, presenting the sacrifice of a parent | ||
The monologue expresses the parent’s sentimental memory of their son’s childhood and their grief at his death | The speaker of the poem directly addresses a soldier, their son, which emphasises strong feelings of loss |
Structure
The poem follows a time sequence which depicts the experience of the parent at the graveside of their son. As time progresses the rhythm changes along with the narrator’s emotions, which reflect the complex nature of their grief.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Suffering and powerlessness due to conflict | The narrative structure leads the reader through a sequence of events from “three days before” to “before you left” to “after you’d gone” and “this is where it has led me” | Weir takes the reader on a personal and intimate journey alongside a grieving parent at their son’s graveside |
The poem clearly separates the life of the parent, the before and the after, to present traumatic loss | ||
The enjambment throughout the poem reflects the free-flowing rhythm of the speaker as they remember their son as a child | This rhythm is typical of a stream of consciousness which reflects a personal memory, evoking empathy from the reader | |
In lines 11, 14, 16, 18 and 21 a caesura breaks the line, disrupting the free-flowing rhythm throughout the poem | The change in tone suggests the emotions of the speaker as fragmented, strained, as the voice and thoughts break due to their grief | |
At the end of the poem, the speaker and the reader are left at the graveside, caught between the past and the present, listening out for the child’s voice on the wind | This lack of resolution suggests the inevitability of grief due to conflict, as well as the parent’s endless suffering |
Language
Weir weaves imagery connoting the comfort of home and family through the poem to describe the emotional suffering of a parent’s grief due to conflict. She contrasts this with brutal imagery related to injury and war to highlight the connections.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Loss of home and family comfort | The extended metaphor of clothes-making (“all my words flattened, rolled, turned into felt / slowly melting”) shows the loss the parent feels as they remember their son’s childhood | The metaphorical comparison of raising a child with making clothes is used to convey frustrated and painful emotions linked to the ending of a project |
The speaker uses military terms alongside domestic images: “like without a winter coat or reinforcements of scarf, gloves” | Weir contrasts domestic imagery with brutal images related to war to highlight the connection between the two ideas and to show the lack of comfort and support felt by a parent in their grief | |
Weir uses imagery related to injury and war: “spasms”, “Bandaged”, “red” | These images convey the violence of war. These juxtaposed alongside domestic imagery alludes to family loss associated with conflict | |
Weir describes personal moments: “graze my nose against the tip of your nose” | The sensory and physical imagery evoke empathy in the reader in order to convey the powerlessness of the parent as they grieve | |
Sacrifice | The metaphor of a dove released and leading to the graveside represents the parent’s son and the idea of peace | Weir’s use of a symbol of peace in a poem about Armistice Sunday comments on the connection between war destroying peace. The loss connected with letting the bird go alludes to the loss the parent feels when they let their son go |
The speaker refers to the bravery required by a parent whose son goes to war | The reference to the bravery of a parent rather than the soldier subverts ideas related to the glorification of war | |
Weir uses sibilance and oxymoron together to highlight the parent’s pain: “steeled the softening” | Weir’s oxymoron alludes to self-sacrifice of a parent, wishing to hide their pain from their son as he leaves for war. The pain is emphasised with the sibilance |
Context
Examiners repeatedly state that context should not be considered as additional factual information: in this case, it is not random biographical information about Jane Weir or historical facts about World War I that are unrelated to the ideas in Poppies. The best way to understand context is to the ideas and perspectives explored by Weir in Poppies which relate to power or conflict. This section has therefore been divided into two relevant themes that Weir explores:
Loss due to conflict
Weir grew up in Ireland during the conflicts of the 1980s, exposing her to the consequences of war on home and family
This could be why she chose to show the perspective of a grieving parent in Poppies
Carol Ann Duffy, Poet Laureate of the United Kingdom between 2009 and 2019, asked Weir to contribute a poem to an anthology which raised awareness of the deaths and suffering of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan
War broke out in Afghanistan in 2001 and in Iraq in 2003, when the United States of America invaded after 9/11
Both wars led to years of battle which resulted in many deaths, as well as ongoing mental health problems amongst survivors
Weir chose to highlight the loss a parent feels remembering their son’s childhood, highlighting the impact of conflict on individuals left behind, particularly parents
Weir uses the symbol of poppies, as they represent remembrance of those killed in war
Poppies represent remembering military personnel killed serving in war
Small artificial poppies are pinned on collars in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand in the lead up to Remembrance/Armistice Day
The poppy as a symbol of remembrance was inspired by the World War I poem. In Flanders Fields, which describes how poppies grew in the fields where soldiers died
Weir explicitly titles her poem Poppies to raise awareness of the theme of remembering
The experience of remembering, however, is shown as painful and powerfully emotive, raising awareness of suffering due to conflict
Armistice Day is mentioned in the poem to connect ideas of conflict and peace
It took place on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month in 1918
This highlights the individual experience of remembrance
Here, Weir connects the idea of peace with the painful memory of a soldier
Armistice Day is celebrated every year on 11th November
It is a day which commemorates peace or Armistice signed by the Allies of World War I
Weir’s poem begins by referring to an event which traditionally commemorates conflict
However, Weir’s poem goes on to show a parent alone at a graveside
Powerlessness due to conflict
Weir’s poem depicts the powerlessness of a parent to recover from grief associated with conflict
The speaker of the poem conveys their frustration and strained emotions
The end of the poem shows the parent as powerless to heal from grief
The speaker highlights the bravery and sacrifice required by the parent
Poppies highlights the powerlessness of a soldier in the face of propaganda
The poem presents the soldier as innocent to the horrors of war
Weir’s monologue shows the soldier as injured and silent, their life stunted
What to Compare it to
The essay you are required to write in your exam is a comparison of the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. It is therefore essential that you revise the poems together, in pairs, to understand how each poet presents ideas about power, or conflict, in comparison to other poets in the anthology. Given that Poppies explores the ideas of loss due to conflict and powerlessness due to conflict, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Poppies and Kamikaze
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both Poppies and Kamikaze convey personal and individual loss due to conflict by presenting the perspectives of family members. The poems explore ideas related to bravery and honour, and how these values can lead to a sense of powerlessness for all involved in conflict.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems show the effects of loss on family members due to conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | Kamikaze |
In Poppies the poet shows the effect of loss on those left behind by presenting the perspective of a parent grieving their son’s death in war | Similarly, Kamikaze shows the perspective of a family member after war, in this case a daughter, narrating a story about their father, a Kamikaze pilot | |
Weir uses enjambment to present a parent’s emotional and evocative stream of consciousness: a free-flowing memory about their son’s childhood. Although, at points, Weir changes the tone with caesurae to break the flow, signifying the parent’s disrupted and emotional break in voice | In Garland’s poem, the perspective alternates between the father’s evocative memories as he leaves for war, and the daughter’s recounting of his dishonourable return. The shift from personal and emotional pain of the father as he chooses to live rather than die, contrasts with the pragmatic retelling of the loss the family felt on his return | |
The speaker in Poppies uses sensory imagery to describe intimate moments of the parent and son’s relationship when he was a child: “Graze my nose across the tip of your nose” | The speaker in Kamikaze also uses sensory imagery to describe the intimate moments the father remembers about his past as he flies to war. These images convey the personal loss experienced due to conflict | |
The pain of loss is presented in both poems by showing personal memories and perspectives of loved ones involved in war, to build empathy in the reader and convey the emotional impact of conflict on family life. |
Topic sentence | Both poets represent powerlessness of those involved in conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | Kamikaze |
Powerlessness of a parent in the face of grief is expressed in Poppies through the reflective tone of a dramatic monologue. It is delivered by a parent in a direct address to their dead son: “hoping to hear your playground voice” | Kamikaze’s reflective tone shifts perspectives from third-person (“he must have wondered which had been the better way to die”) to a first-person plural (“the father we loved”). The reflections shift perspective to convey the different ways the family members respond | |
It could be argued that both speakers convey the powerlessness of loved ones during conflict as they reflect on their experience of loss | ||
Weir represents the parent’s powerlessness to be with their son again using sensory imagery to end the poem without any resolution, leaving the parent listening for their son’s voice on the wind | Garland presents the daughter’s powerlessness through sensory imagery related to sound: “we too learned to be silent”, suggesting the daughter’s broken relationship with her father was not autonomous and without clear resolution |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While both poets suggest that conflict leads to powerlessness, the poems present different attitudes to war | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | Kamikaze |
In Poppies, the parent suggests the son was innocent to the realities of war. The metaphor “the world overflowing like a treasure chest” connotes to childish ideas that war may bring glory and adventure | In Kamikaze, however, the father doubts his role in war. He looks back on his childhood, describing it from the aeroplane in sensory imagery connoting colourful treasure: “pearl-grey pebbles” and “shoals of fishes flashing silver” | |
The parent describes their son as “intoxicated” with war, implying he was poisoned with the ideas associated with it | Here, the father is convinced by his memories to return home instead of dying for his country | |
The parent experiences grief as a result of the son’s enthusiasm for conflict | Here, the parent experiences grief, however, it is because he is alienated by his family for not being honourable in conflict |
Poppies and War Photographer
Comparison in a nutshell:
This is an effective comparative choice to explore the impact of conflict on those other than soldiers themselves. Both Weir’s Poppies and Duffy’s War Photographer present unconventional perspectives and descriptions of the experience of grief due to war.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems show that conflict has wide-reaching influence by showing particular individuals who are affected by it | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | War Photographer |
An unconventional experience of grief is presented through a narration of a parent visiting their son’s grave and remembering his childhood | Duffy shows the experience of grief from the perspective of a war photographer developing photographs and remembering what he has seen | |
Weir’s poem is structured to represent the parent’s personal grief as they stand at the grave and remember their son. The poem uses adverbs of time such as “before” and “after” to depict the way the parent’s life has been impacted by the loss of their son | Duffy’s poem represents the photographer’s personal grief through disjointed flashbacks as he remembers those who have suffered in conflict: “running children in a nightmare heat” | |
The speaker is left remembering their son at the end of the poem, suggesting the continued experience of grief | The poem ends with the line “they do not care” suggesting a lack of resolution for the speaker | |
Both poets reflect on the impact of conflict by presenting the experience of grief by speakers who are traumatised by their memories and whose lives have been affected negatively | ||
The poems consider the experience of grief as a solitary one; they convey the isolation of the parent and the photographer in their settings | ||
Both poets wish to raise awareness of the effect of conflict on individual lives beyond the battlefields, at home or at work:
|
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Weir chooses a nostalgic and emotional first-person reflection in Poppies, Duffy’s War Photographer uses a detached, third-person voice to portray the impact of conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | War Photographer |
The first-person perspective of a parent addressing their son has an emotive effect, in order to build empathy for the parent’s suffering | Duffy distances the reader by telling the story of a photographer in a dark-room in third-person narration. The omniscient voice of the narrator allows reader’s insight to the photographer’s thoughts while emphasising his solitude | |
The parent speaks to their son, remembering intimate moments of his childhood: “I pinned one onto your lapel”. As the reader listens in on the parent’s thoughts, they are aware the son does not reply, creating a sense of solitude and an emotive commentary on personal grief | However, the photographer’s emotive memories in Duffy’s poem are disjointed, caught between a detached and cynical tone of the omniscient narrator: “stares impassively at where/he earns his living and they do not care” | |
Duffy’s poem uses pronouns to convey the photographer’s isolation from “they”, the public | ||
Though the tone and perspective of each poem is different, they both present grief as a result of war as an isolating and traumatic experience |
Poppies and Remains
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both Weir’s Poppies and Armitage’s Remains highlight the unrelenting nature of grief as a result of loss. The poems present speakers who feel powerless in the wake of war, due to haunting trauma.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems highlight relentless grief and trauma through the presentation of individual and unrelieved memories related to conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | Remains |
In Poppies, the speaker narrates a moment-by-moment reliving of their son’s childhood as they remember small moments and details: “I rounded up as many white cat hairs as I could”. The nostalgic tone and intimacy of the details convey the parent’s deep and ongoing grief: “being Eskimos like we did when you were little” | Similarly, in Remains, the speaker has a flashback to a moment during battle: “On another occasion, we get sent out to tackle looters raiding a bank.” His description of vivid memories imply the speaker is unable to forget the images: “I see every round as it rips through his life”. He confirms this: “the drink and drugs won’t flush him out” | |
Similarly, both poems show the speakers’ powerful and detailed memories to express the haunting effects of conflict | ||
The poem’s speakers are both caught between the present and past throughout the poem, suggesting the relentless nature of their trauma. The speaker in Remains is left in the “here and now” without resolution (“end of story. Except not really”), while the speaker in Poppies is left listening for their son’s playground voice on the wind |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While both poets explore the negative impact of loss on individuals through memories, the poets choose to present the reflections using different tones of voice to convey varied responses to grief | |
Evidence and analysis | Poppies | Remains |
In Poppies, the speaker’s tone of voice is nostalgic. Enjambment and positive imagery create a sentimental free-flowing monologue | On the other hand, in Remains, the speaker’s tone is cynical. The rhythm is disjointed with caesurae and varied sentence lengths. His register is colloquial and violent: “and tosses his guts back into his body” | |
Poppies presents the perspective of a parent remembering comforting and positive memories of their past with their son, while Remains presents the perspective of a soldier, his memories cynical and brutal |
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?