Follower (AQA GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
Each poetry anthology at GCSE contains 15 poems, and in your exam question you will be given one poem - printed in full - and asked to compare this printed poem to another. As this is a closed-book exam, you will not have access to the second poem, so you will have to know it from memory. Fifteen poems is a lot to revise. However, understanding four things will enable you to produce a top-grade response:
The meaning of the poem
The ideas and messages of the poet
How the poet conveys these ideas through their methods
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas of other poets in the anthology
Below is a guide to Seamus Heaney’s 'Follower', from the Love and Relationships anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
A ‘translation’ of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Seamus Heaney’s intention and message
'Follower' in a nutshell
'Follower', written by the poet Seamus Heaney, describes a vivid memory from the speaker’s childhood. The speaker describes his father, an expert, teaching him how to work the land. The poem’s ending suggests the speaker acknowledges the changing relationship and power dynamic as he grows up.
'Follower' overview
Lines 1 -4
“My father worked with a horse-plough,
His shoulders globed like a full sail strung
Between the shafts and the furrow.
The horses strained at his clicking tongue.”
Translation
The poem’s speaker tells the reader his father was a strong and broad farmer
He shows how the animals were under his control
Heaney’s intention
Heaney begins his first-person poem with a narration describing the speaker’s father as in charge and capable, in order to show the respect he had for him
Lines 5-7
“An expert. He would set the wing
And fit the bright steel-pointed sock.
The sod rolled over without breaking.”
Translation
The speaker describes his father as very good at his job
Heaney’s intention
Heaney presents a vivid description of the speaker’s father to show the power of the memory and his deep respect for his father’s expertise
Lines 8-12
“At the headrig, with a single pluck
Of reins, the sweating team turned round
And back into the land. His eye
Narrowed and angled at the ground,
Mapping the furrow exactly.”
Translation
The speaker now describes the horses turning as his father pulls the reins
The father is exacting and careful as he plans his work
Heaney’s intention
Heaney shows how much respect the animals have for his father, reacting as soon as his father commands
The vivid memories present the influence of his father on his life
Line 13-16
“I stumbled in his hobnailed wake,
Fell sometimes on the polished sod;
Sometimes he rode me on his back
Dipping and rising to his plod.”
Translation
Here, the speaker remembers himself as a child and describes his small figure struggling in the fields
He remembers his father helping him
Heaney’s intention
Heaney’s speaker remembers how difficult it was for him as a child working on the farm
The poem shows the close bond between the father and son, linked by shared labour
Lines 17-20
“I wanted to grow up and plough,
To close one eye, stiffen my arm.
All I ever did was follow
In his broad shadow round the farm.”
Translation
The detailed observational narration continues as the speaker describes his father’s actions and how he wished to mimic them
Heaney’s intention
Heaney conveys the speaker’s desire to be like his father, presenting the parent as a role model
Lines 21-22
“I was a nuisance, tripping, falling,
Yapping always. But today”
Translation
The speaker recognises how he must have been annoying to his father as a small child
Heaney’s intention
Heaney uses a list to show the repetition of the son’s actions as a child in order to present the perspective of the father, offering an alternative view
Lines 23-24
“It is my father who keeps stumbling
Behind me, and will not go away”
Translation
The speaker describes his father’s actions now he is older
He expresses his own frustration at his limited capability
Heaney’s intention
Heaney conveys the shifting relationship over time
His father is the one who is a nuisance now
Writer’s Methods
Although this section is organised into three separate sections - form, structure and language - it is always best to move from what the poet is presenting (the techniques they use; the overall form of the poem; what comes at the beginning, middle and end of a poem) to how and why they have made the choices they have.
Focusing on the poet’s overarching ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. Crucially, in the below sections, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes Seamus Heaney’s intentions behind his choices in terms of:
Form
Seamus Heaney’s narrative poem pays tribute to the intimate bond between father and son, while reflecting on the changing identities and relationships between a son and parent, particularly regarding strength and dependence.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Changing identities in family relationships | The childhood memory is presented in the first-person voice of an adult son to show his perspective as he looks back on the past | Heaney shows the son reflecting on the shift in the male power dynamic: he compares himself as a dependant child to his father now he is older |
The poem is cyclical in nature, repeating ideas about dependence As a child he “stumbled in his hob-nob wake” but now his father “keeps stumbling” | The poet shows the cycle of family life: the son as a dependant child now grown and taking his father’s place | |
Heaney uses a caesura to show the changing nature of their relationship: “Yapping always. But today” | The tone changes here as the speaker identifies that while he was reliant on his father then, it is his father who depends on him now | |
Seamus Heaney’s poem takes the form of a reflection on his childhood to convey how strength and independence is passed down from father to son |
Structure
The poem’s rhythmic structure shows the speaker’s composed reflections on his father, representing their relationship as stable and strong. However, Heaney’s alternating rhyme scheme conveys the son’s tension as he attempts to rise to his father’s expectations.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Acceptance and independence | Heaney’s poem is made up of four quatrains with lines of similar length in a disciplined an controlled structure | As the speaker remembers a childhood memory working on the farm, his tone is composed as well as nostalgic to present the stable nature of his relationship with his father |
Heaney’s poem uses half-rhymes to represent the speaker and perfect rhyming lines to represent his father
| The speaker’s tone presents a slight tension which implies his need to be like his father and to follow in his footsteps, whereas the perfect rhyming lines as he describes his father, imply an unshakeable voice | |
Seamus Heaney depicts a speaker taking comfort from his memory of his stable childhood, however, he suggests his attempt to mimic his father is not without challenge |
Language
Seamus Heaney uses natural imagery to depict the speaker’s memory of his father teaching him to work on the farm and to present the simple, yet disciplined hard-working father he admires. While verbs are used to convey the active role his father took in his life, by the end they present the father as dependent on his son now that he is older.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Nostalgia | The semantic field of work shows the hard labour his father was capable of
| The poet highlights the powerful impact of the event with vivid imagery presenting his father as a capable expert |
The simile presents his father as strong: “His shoulders globed like a full sail strung” | Heaney’s speaker compares his father’s physical strength to a sail, connoting natural power | |
Seamus Heaney conveys the close bond a son has with his father through a vivid depiction of a childhood memory in which he describes his father as strong and capable |
Context
Examiners repeatedly state that context should not be considered as additional factual information: in this case, it is not random biographical information about Seamus Heaney or facts unrelated to the ideas in Follower. The best way to understand context is as the ideas and perspectives explored by Seamus Heaney in Follower which relate to family love and relationships.
This section has therefore been divided into two relevant themes that Heaney explores:
Family relationships
Seamus Heaney was the eldest son of a farmer, brought up in traditional, rural Ireland
The poem describes his father as working a plough with horses
The poem conveys the son’s admiration for his capable and reliable father illustrating the close bond in the paternal relationship
Traditional values within family relationships, specifically between father and son, are depicted through the speaker’s memory
The son comments on how he wished to become just like his father
His father is described as strong and “broad”, in charge of the farm
Acceptance and independence
Seamus Heaney’s poem, Follower, was published in an anthology called “Death of a Naturalist” in 1966
The collection focuses on Heaney’s rural childhood, working on the farm with his father, being taught how to do manual labour
The poem focuses on the lessons the son was taught by his father
As the eldest child, he was expected to follow in his father’s footsteps
The poem (perhaps autobiographical) focuses on the dependence between a son and father and the changing dynamic as the parent ages
By the end, however, the son seems impatient with his father’s closeness
He reflects on his father, now “stumbling” and not going “away”
The poem implies the son has not chosen the same path as his father
What to compare it to
The essay you are required to write in your exam is a comparison of the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. It is therefore essential that you revise the poems together, in pairs, to understand how each poet presents ideas about love or relationships, in comparison to other poets in the anthology. Given that Follower explores the ideas of family relationships and independence, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
'Follower' and 'Eden Rock'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both Seamus Heaney’s 'Follower' and Charles Causely’s 'Eden Rock' present male speakers with positive memories of their parents which convey the influence and significance in their son’s lives. While Heaney’s poem discusses the shifting roles within family relationships and a need for independence, Causely’s poem deals with unresolved separation from absent parents.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems describe their parents with admiration and love | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Eden Rock' |
Heaney’s speaker describes his positive reflections of a day with his father when he was young, using enjambment and regular quatrains to create a sentimental tone | Similarly, Charles Causely’s first-person speaker describes a vivid memory of a picnic with his parents
| |
Heaney’s speaker describes his father with imagery presenting him as in control and respected
| The speaker here also describes his parents as he remembers them as a child
| |
Heaney’s speaker describes his father offering him advice and stability
| The speaker’s perspective of his parents as reassuring and guiding is shown in their communication to him despite their distance: “'See where the stream-path is!/Crossing is not as hard as you might think.'” | |
Causely and Heaney both pay tribute to their parents’ role in their development and present their parents as stabilising and guiding factors in their lives |
Topic sentence | Both poets illustrate simple childhood memories which are powerfully vivid | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Eden Rock' |
Heaney’s speaker presents the memory in evocative sensory description: The “sweating team” work with “The bright steel-pointed sock” and the “polished sod” | Causely uses sensory language to present the immersion and vivid recollection of the speaker
| |
Heaney’s speaker remembers a simple and typical day with his father
| The ordinariness of the picnic is represented with natural imagery
| |
The speaker alludes to the power of the memory of his father as described by the actions of his father
| The speaker’s imagination is powerful as he hears his parents calling to him and his memory brings surreal images to his mind
| |
Both Heaney and Causely present the influence of seemingly insignificant moments in their childhoods which have a lasting impact on the sons |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Seamus Heaney’s poem ends with a speaker who wishes for independence, Charles Causely’s poem ends with a speaker unable to accept the distance between them [the speaker and their parents] | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Eden Rock' |
In 'Follower', the speaker returns from reflections of their father with a sense of frustration that the father “will not go away”
| Here, the speaker’s unresolved longing for their parents suggests they are caught up in the past
| |
The speaker remembers his father as a younger man, yet is able to see him differently now he is older as he is still with him | The speaker remembers a specific memory of his parents as young adults, which suggests he sees them like that still, as they were then | |
Both poets present positive childhood memories. However, while Heaney shows a speaker who is more aware of the changing nature of his father, Causely depicts a more idealised version of the speaker’s parents |
'Follower' and 'Mother Any Distance'
Comparison in a nutshell:
This is an effective comparative choice to explore changing roles in family relationships. Both Seamus Heaney’s 'Follower' and Simon Armitage’s Mother Any Distance deal with complex dynamics of intimacy and independence between a parent and child.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems present speakers who express their admiration for, and feel reassurance from, supportive parents | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Mother Any Distance' |
Heaney’s poem focuses on a significant, yet typical memory of a son and his father working on a farm
| Similarly, Armitage’s poem explores the emotional impact of a normal event - a parent helping their child move and measuring the rooms
| |
Seamus Heaney’s speaker shows his father as careful and exacting
| Armitage, too, describes his mother’s calm and guiding actions
| |
The speakers both explore the family relationship by showing the impact of ordinary events during which parents provide their children with support and guidance |
Topic sentence | Both poems present speakers who express painful and confusing feelings about the distance between parent and child | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Mother Any Distance' |
Heaney’s speaker is uneasy about the changing relationship
| Armitage’s speaker, too, seems confused about whether to be with his parents or become independent
| |
Heaney’s speaker presents a nostalgic tone regarding his father with lines of enjambment at the start, however by the end the speaker’s tone changes with caesura to represent the changes in the relationship: “always yapping.But today” | Similarly, Armitage’s speaker mixes reflective enjambment with poignant pauses created by caesurae to reflect his mixed emotions: “the last one-hundredth of an inch...I reach” | |
Both poems explore the strong pull of parental love and the confusing emotions of growing independence |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While both poems show a close bond, Seamus Heaney’s poem focuses on a son’s need to follow in his father’s footsteps and Simon Armitage’s poem focuses around a son breaking away from his mother | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Mother Any Distance' |
Heaney’s poem presents the speaker’s father as close by at the end
| Armitage, however, has a speaker who describes the relationship as possessive using present-tense verbs, “your fingertips still pinch” | |
The poem illustrates traditional family values:
| However, Armitage shows a child realising the necessity of leaving:
| |
Both poems discuss family love. However Heaney’s speaker offers strength and comfort to his father as he ages, while Armitage’s speaker chooses freedom |
'Follower' and 'Before You Were Mine'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both Seamus Heaney’s poem 'Follower' and Carol Ann Duffy’s poem 'Before You Were Mine' present the perspectives of children reflecting on their parents in their younger years and acknowledging the different roles within family relationships. However, Heaney’s poem only considers the role of fatherhood, whereas Duffy’s poem considers her mother as an individual before she had a child.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems are tributes to parents by speakers who reflect on their parents in younger years | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Before You Were Mine' |
Heaney’s poem describes the father with a simile presenting him as a strong and vibrant younger man: “His shoulders globed like a full sail strung”
| Similarly, the first-person speaker in 'Before You Were Mine' describes her mother in rich imagery: “Your polka-dot dress blows round your legs” and “you shriek at the pavement” | |
The speakers evoke positive imagery to show their parents as vibrant younger adults | ||
Heaney’s speaker shows his parents as guiding him in his life: “All I ever did was follow/In his broad shadow round the farm.” | Similarly, Duffy’s speaker reflects on her mother as a mentor and presents her poem as a eulogy: “You'd teach me the steps on the way home” | |
The poems both comment on the powerful, positive influence of parents in family relationships, while the speakers equally recognise them as younger, more powerful individuals |
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poets present speakers who comment on dependence within family relationships | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Before You Were Mine' |
Heaney’s poem presents a speaker who is aware he was reliant on his father as a child
| Duffy’s speaker, too,is aware of her impact in the mother’s life: “The decade ahead of my loud, possessive yell” | |
The speaker presents the close link in family relationships with with the possessive pronoun “my” | Duffy’s speaker also relates this idea with repetition of the line: “'Before You Were Mine'.” | |
The poets both explore family love which comments on the dependance of a child on their parent |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Seamus Heaney’s poem depicts a speaker who consider their father’s role in their life, while Carol Ann Duffy’s poem presents a speaker aware of her mother as an individual, not just in her role as parent | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Follower' | 'Before You Were Mine' |
Heaney’s speaker describes his father in his role as father: “Sometimes he rode me on his back” | However, Duffy’s speaker reflects on her mother as she was before she had a child: “where you sparkle and waltz and laugh 'Before You Were Mine'.” | |
Heaney’s speaker discusses his father in a detached third-person | Duffy, however, presents an intimate monologue which directly addresses the mother: “You reckon it’s worth it.” | |
Both speakers reflect on their parents, however Heaney’s poem is a childhood memory of his own, whereas Duffy’s poem is an imagined event from her mother’s past |
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?