How to Answer Question 7(b) (Edexcel GCSE English Language)

Revision Note

Deb Orrock

Written by: Deb Orrock

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Question 7(b) on Paper 2 of your Edexcel GCSE English Language exam is the comparison question.

Question 7(b) summary

  • Based on both texts

  • 14-mark question

  • Timing: 20 minutes

  • Tests AO3: your ability to compare writers’ ideas and perspectives, as well as how these are conveyed, across two or more texts

Top tips

  • Read the question carefully

  • Highlight the focus of the question

  • Use the knowledge gained from answering the other questions to help you

  • Your answer can focus on similarities and/or differences between the texts

  • Aim to comment on themes, language and structure

  • Support each point of comparison with evidence from each text

  • Aim to make at least 4–5 robust comparisons

The following guide to how to answer Question 7(b) includes:

  • Question 7(b) overview

  • How to answer Question 7(b)

  • How to compare

  • Exam tips

Question 7(b) overview

Question 7(b) is the comparison question. It is worth 14 marks and you should spend 20 minutes on it, including reading time. 

The question will be about the whole of Text 1 and Text 2, and you will be asked to compare how the writers of the two texts present their ideas and perspectives about a specific thing. This includes similarities and differences.

There are five levels to the mark scheme for this question, and at the highest level:

Level 5:

12–14 marks

  • The response explores a varied and comprehensive range of comparisons between the texts

  • There is analysis of writers’ ideas and perspectives, including how themes, language and/or structure is used across the texts

  • Evidence is taken from both texts to support and clarify the points being made

Responses at the highest level offer a range of comparisons, using comparative phrases such as “similarly” and “in contrast”.

How to answer Question 7(b)

Let’s take a look at this example from the June 2023 exam:

Exam question asking to compare writers' perspectives on escape in two texts, with notes highlighting the focus on escape and detailed text references.
Paper 2 Question 7(b)

The focus of this question is on how the writers present ideas and perspectives about escape.

In order to achieve full marks for this question, you should:

  1. Read the question carefully and highlight the focus:

    • What specifically have you been asked to compare?

  2. Using your knowledge of both texts from answering Questions 1–7(a), note down:

    • What the writers’ ideas and perspectives are about the question’s focus

    • How they present their ideas (how have they written the texts to present their ideas)

  3. Then, for each of these points of comparison, find and highlight some evidence that supports each one from each text

  4. Start your answer with a summary statement, using the wording of the question:

    • This should summarise briefly the comparison being made

    • For example: “Both texts present men who are desperate to escape.”

  5. Make at least 4–5 comparisons, using comparative language such as “similarly”, “in comparison” or “in contrast”

  6. Support each comparison with evidence from each text

Please see the Question 7(b): Model Answer revision note for more detailed examples.

How to compare

This question requires you to understand information and ideas from two sources and focus on the writers’ perspectives. You are expected to bring together and compare the two perspectives on a specific subject, analysing the differences and linking these points of view to the methods used by the writers to convey them. 

This question requires a response which includes:

  • a demonstration of your understanding of the ideas and perspectives in both texts

  • a comparison of these ideas and the writers’ different perspectives

  • relevant textual detail

  • an explanation of how both writers have used a range of methods to convey their points of view

How to compare texts in the exam

As this is a comparison question, it's important to identify the purpose of each text, their respective audiences, and to understand the main ideas that the writers intend to convey.

  • When you're comparing non-fiction texts, your goal is to identify areas where the texts share common ground

  • Contrasting involves pointing out the differences between the texts

  • This can be in terms of ideas, themes, literary features, structure or any other relevant aspect

  • You're essentially looking for connections that help to explain how the texts relate to each other, or how they differ

  • When comparing and contrasting, it's crucial to provide specific examples from the texts:

    • These make your comparisons more robust 

  • The ultimate goal of comparing and contrasting is to draw insights from the similarities and differences you have identified:

    • What do these shared and distinct elements reveal about the writers’ intentions and perspectives? 

    • Do comparisons and contrasts shed light on the larger context or themes within which these texts exist?

  • Comparing and contrasting requires critical thinking and analytical skills:

    • Don't just list similarities and differences; delve deeper into why these similarities and differences are important

Here are some words and phrases that can be used to signal comparisons and contrasts in your response: 



Words to compare


similarly


likewise


equally


both


comparably


in the same way


Words to  contrast


on the other hand


although


however


while


whereas


in contrast

Comparing writers’ perspectives

The writer’s perspective refers to their unique way of presenting ideas, themes, characters or events in their writing. This perspective shapes how they develop their narrative and engage with the reader. For this type of question, it’s important to provide thoughtful insights and to demonstrate an understanding of how different writers can approach similar themes in unique ways.

Below are some ideas which you should consider when thinking about how to compare the writers’ perspectives and ideas:

Analyse perspectives

Identify themes

Compare and contrast

Examine how each writer presents their viewpoint, opinions and ideas within their texts. This includes looking at their use of dialogue, narration and use of literary devices

Identify the central themes or ideas that each writer explores in their writing. These could be recurring motifs or messages that the writers want to convey to their readers

Discuss the similarities and differences between these perspectives and ideas. Consider how each writer has approached a similar theme or topic, as well as how they diverge in their approaches and message

Contextualise

Use evidence

Draw conclusions

Consider the context in which the writers wrote their texts. Consider the purpose, audience and form of each text

Support your analysis with specific examples from the texts. Quote lines that highlight the writers’ perspectives and ideas and explain how these contribute to the overall understanding of their writing

Draw conclusions about the writers’ intentions, viewpoints and the impact of their ideas on the reader's understanding

Examiner Tips and Tricks

As you prepare your response to this question, it is a good idea to annotate in the margins of the source documents what the writers’ feelings appear to be about the focus of the question. You have to demonstrate that you fundamentally understand their feelings, experiences and perspectives in order to be able to write a high-scoring answer to this question.

Exam tips

  • The best responses to this question identify perspectives and the impact on the reader across both texts

  • You should consider how the writers select and present information to shape their texts

  • Integrated comparisons tend to be more successful than writing first about Text 1, then about Text 2

  • You should aim to comment on themes, language (including tone) and structure (including pace)

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Deb Orrock

Author: Deb Orrock

Expertise: English Content Creator

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Senior Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.