How to Answer Question 6 (Edexcel GCSE English Language)

Revision Note

Deb Orrock

Written by: Deb Orrock

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Question 6 on Paper 2 of your Edexcel GCSE English Language exam is the evaluate question.

Question 6 summary

  • Based on Text 2

  • 15-mark question

  • Timing: 20 minutes

  • Tests AO4: your ability to evaluate texts critically and support this with appropriate textual references

Top tips

  • Read the question carefully

  • Highlight the focus of the question

  • Annotate the text as you read

  • Cover the whole of the text in your answer

  • You are being asked to judge how well a writer has achieved their desired meaning or effect

  • Use evaluative language to support your judgements

The following guide to how to answer Question 6 includes:

  • Question 6 overview

  • How to answer Question 6

  • How to evaluate

  • Exam tips

Question 6 overview

Question 6 is the evaluation question. It is worth 15 marks and you should spend 20 minutes on it, including reading time.

The question will be based on the whole of Text 2, and the focus will be on evaluating how well something has been achieved, not just how it has been achieved. You are being asked to assess how successful the writer is in achieving the desired effects, rather than just an explanation of the techniques used. There are five levels to the mark scheme for this question, and at the highest level students show the following:

Level 5:

13–15 marks

  • There is evaluation of ideas, events, themes or settings

  • There is a sustained and detached critical overview and judgement about the text

  • The selection of references is apt and discriminating, and is persuasive in clarifying the points being made

If you only include references to the writer’s techniques in your answer, without any critical comments regarding their success, then you cannot achieve higher than Level 2 in the mark scheme.

Again, all of the points you make must be supported with appropriate and relevant textual references

How to answer Question 6

Let’s take a look at this example from the June 2023 exam:

Exam question about evaluating the importance of planning in an extract, with annotations highlighting key reminders for answering comprehensively.
Paper 2 Question 6

The focus of this question is on how well the writer attempts to show the importance of planning.

In order to achieve full marks for this question, you should:

  1. Read the question carefully and highlight its focus

  2. Read the extract and annotate in the margins:

    • Identify what the writer has done and how successful they have been, as relevant to the focus of the question

For example:

Annotated text about escape planning from Papillon, highlighting importance of careful organisation and detailed strategies to avoid danger during execution.
Paper 2 Question 6 text annotations
  1. Start your answer with a summary statement, using the wording of the question:

    • This should summarise briefly how successful the writer has been and why

    • For example: “The writer successfully shows the importance of planning by continually highlighting how complex the attempted escape from the island is.”

  2. Make a range of points that cover the whole of the extract:

    • You can structure this as “At the start of the extract”, “In the middle of the extract” and “At the end of the extract” in order to ensure full coverage

  3. For every point you make, ensure you provide 1–2 short, relevant quotes or textual references to support it

Please see the Question 6: Model Answer revision note for more detailed examples.

How to evaluate

Evaluation involves making an informed judgement based on careful analysis and consideration of the text. It involves a critical examination of the extract in order to assess the success of its intended effect.

As you read through the text, consider the following:

  • What key language or structural devices has the writer used to achieve the desired meaning or effect?

  • What is the value of the device used? What does it do?

  • Use evaluative phrases to show your opinion:

    • For example: “effectively”, “powerfully”, “skilfully”, “masterfully”

  • Provide evidence from the text to support your judgement

Remember, the examiners want you to succeed. It would be difficult to argue that a writer has not been successful in achieving the desired effect; there will be more to support the fact that they have been successful than to argue against.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You may consider using the acronym SPITE to help you answer this question. SPITE stands for: setting, people, perspectives, ideas, themes and events. 

You can ask: why this setting? How does the setting add impact for readers? Does it change? Why this perspective? Whose opinion am I getting, or whose voice am I listening to? What sort of ideas or thoughts are presented, and do these change? What are the themes and the writer’s overall message? What events happen and why? 

You can then use this in your analysis by telling the examiner that the “writer uses the setting to successfully show…”

Exam tips

  • In order to get top marks for this question, you must ensure you include sustained, critical judgement about the writer’s methods and techniques, not analysis of the methods and techniques themselves:

    • Make sure you understand the difference between AO2 (Question 3) and AO4 (Question 6)

  • To do this, you must consider the text as a deliberate construct by the writer:

    • “Informed judgement” means that you have asked yourself why the writer has made the choices they have and how effective they are

  • Use evaluative language throughout your response:

    • Words like “successfully”, “effectively”, “artfully” and “skilfully” all show evaluative judgements

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Deb Orrock

Author: Deb Orrock

Expertise: English Content Creator

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Senior Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.