Evaluating the Evidence
- Advances in science and technology mean current levels of CO2 and global temperatures can be determined with a high degree of accuracy
- Historical data is much less accurate due to the lack of accurate instrumentation and methods
- Fewer locations would also have been measured due to the lack of satellites and transport
- There are some methods to estimate past climate conditions, which include:
- Analysis of the fossil record and tree rings
- Analysis of gas bubbles trapped in ice from hundreds of thousands of years ago
Correlating rising CO2 levels and global temperatures
Graph showing the steady increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1700
Graph showing the steady increase in temperature from when accurate records exist
- Unfortunately, historical methods, while providing at least some data, are not as precise as modern day techniques nor do they provide data which is representative on a global scale
- The complexity of the Earth’s climate and contributing factors make it a difficult task to produce a working model that clearly shows the link between global warming and greenhouse gases
- This and other difficulties have led to hype and speculation in the media in recent times in which some scientists have cast doubts on human activity and climate change
- However, academic surveys have shown that about 97% of climate scientists do believe human activity is causing climate change
Examiner Tip
It is important that peer review of research results as well as communication to a wide range of audiences is carried out to dispell myths and misinformation about climate change