Formation of Personal Relationships: Biological Theories of Attraction (DP IB Psychology)
Revision Note
Biological Theories of Attraction
The evolutionary theory of attraction
The evolutionary explanation of attraction/partner preference is based purely on opposite-sex attraction (as, until fairly recently, it was only possible to reproduce via traditional sexual intercourse)
The traits which are deemed attractive by males and by females are quite distinct and have different functions according to evolutionary psychology
Inter-sexual attraction refers to the differences between males and females and the ways in which these differences manifest themselves as attractive qualities in a mate
Inter-sexual attraction can be seen vividly and obviously in animal mating patterns, for example:
the male peacock’s display of colourful feathers to attract a female
the zig-zag dance performed by male sticklebacks to attract the attention of fertile females
Examples of male display and female fertility are not so marked in human beings but some parallels can be drawn as follows:
Human males who are wealthy give a ‘display’ of their wealth via expensive cars, houses, yachts, watches etc.
By displaying his wealth the human male is telling interested females that he has resources i.e. he can support her and any children she may bear him
Human females who are fertile tend to be young (menopause signals the end of fertility around the age of 40)
Female physical attributes which signal fertility include generous hips, ample bosom, an appearance of youthfulness
In short, males must have resources to offer security to the female; females must show that they are a good ‘investment’ in terms of their child-rearing potential
Female choosiness is the concept that females must exercise much more caution and wariness when choosing a sexual partner than males need to
One of the main explanations for female choosiness is that ‘sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive’ i.e. men can produce billions of spermatozoa per day whereas a woman will produce only one egg per month
What the above points boil down to is:
females must take care not to have sex with ‘just anyone’
the result of casual sex could be pregnancy
the female may then be saddled with a partner who lacks sufficient resources
males can have a lot of sex and never get pregnant so the same conditions do not apply to them!
Evaluation of the evolutionary theory of attraction
Strengths
There is some validity to this theory as seen in some research findings
Support for the theory can also be seen in anecdotal evidence derived from real-world observations e.g. rich, older men with much younger women
Limitations
The theory lacks external validity as it does not account for variations in mating preferences, for example:
women are actually able to support themselves and do not necessarily need to rely on a man for resources
some men do not focus solely on physical attractiveness and some men prefer older women
people are not slaves to their evolutionary urges: they are able to use sophisticated cognitions in their choice of partner
Evolutionary theory is solely concerned with heterosexual mating preferences and reproduction which means that it has limited applicability to homosexual people and to the LGBTQ community as a whole
The neurochemical theory of attraction
The neurochemical explanation of attraction may be found by investigating neurotransmitters (e.g. dopamine) and their effect on behaviour
Dopamine production has been linked to the following regions:
the ventral tegmental area
the nucleus accumbens
the caudate nucleus
the basal ganglia
Dopamine has been strongly associated with reward, motivation, intense pleasure and, by association, addiction
Some research has found that dopamine-rich areas of the brain are activated when:
someone is experiencing a highly pleasurable activity/sensation/event
someone anticipates experiencing a highly pleasurable activity/sensation/event
cues which remind someone of a pleasurable stimulus are in place
The neurochemical theory of attraction is that the brain becomes ‘addicted’ to the feelings associated with romantic love i.e. even thinking about the person with whom one is ‘in love’ is enough to trigger dopamine activation
This ‘addicted to love’ response is nothing to do with sex: it is a short-term infatuation which is thought to be the starting point for a couple to cement their commitment to each other
Once the short-term infatuation is over (around 6 months) then the relationship settles down into a more balanced, stable form (which sounds dull but is essential for the long-term success of the relationship)
The brain structures and regions which are associated with dopamine production.
Evaluation of the neurochemical explanation of MDD
Strengths
Research in this field uses scientific, objective methods e.g. fMRI scans, which increases its reliability
Research in this field uses standardised procedures which are replicable and can be tested for reliability
Limitations
Attempting to explain a complex phenomenon such as being ‘in love’ using brain scanning is overly reductionist as it ignores a raft of other possible explanations, for example:
Feeling a sense of connectedness to the other person (cognitive, not biological)
Sharing hobbies, activities, likes and dislikes with the other person (sociocultural, not biological)
Although dopamine is the most researched neurotransmitter it is still, largely, a mystery in terms of its function and effect on people’s behaviour
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember that reductionism can be viewed as a strength as well as a limitation (which is how it is usually presented). Being able to focus on one, clear, ‘pure’ explanation for a behaviour can actually be a useful process as it cuts through a lot of the ‘white noise’ of research e.g. variables which may be relevant but which are very difficult to measure such as upbringing, personality etc.
Which studies investigate a biological explanation of MDD?
Clarke & Hatfield (1989): evolutionary explanation: a field experiment investigating female choosiness
Fisher et al. (2003): neurochemical explanation: fMRI scans of people ‘in love’ to determine a link to dopamine activation
Clarke & Hatfield (1989) and Fisher et al. (2005) are available as Two Key Studies of Biological Theories of Attraction – just navigate the Formation of Personal Relationships section to find them.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?