Factors Which influence the Diagnosis of Abnormal Behaviour (DP IB Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Claire Neeson
Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson
Diagnosing Abnormality
There are key criteria available to clinicians which they use in order to classify or diagnose specific behaviours as ‘abnormal’
Most of the measures used to determine abnormality follow the biomedical model of disease which will (generally but not always) tend to result in some form of drug therapy being used to treat the illness e.g. antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders
Clinicians tend to use four different (though overlapping) measures for determining whether an individual is exhibiting abnormal behaviour:
Table 1: Definitions of Abnormality
Measure | Explanation |
---|---|
Statistical deviation | Behaviour which falls outside of agreed statistical parameters e.g. an IQ of less than 70 is considered abnormal |
Failure to function adequately | Behaviour which does not conform to accepted social standards e.g. not washing, not eating |
Deviation from social norms | Behaviour which is shocking, surprising or which challenges social norms e.g. someone wearing a plant pot on their head |
Deviation from ideal mental health | Behaviour which is not completely ‘perfect’ for that individual e.g. an inability to handle stress |
Evaluation of the measures of abnormality
Statistical deviation:
Strengths
The measures provide clear points of comparison between people, making it easy to test and to use as an analytical tool e.g. if person X scores 70 on an IQ test this falls a long way below the mean average for the population
Applying statistical deviation as a measure includes the use of a standardised tool which means that the measure has built-in reliability
Weaknesses
Statistical deviation would not recognise depression as abnormal behaviour because depression is estimated to affect around 280,000,000 people across the world at any given time i.e. it is not statistically deviant
Some behaviours which are statistically deviant e.g. having an IQ of 175, are not necessarily undesirable or adverse yet they fall within the same frame of reference as do low IQ scores which limits the usefulness of this measure
Failure to function adequately (FTFA)
Strengths
This measure provides clear guidelines for the classification and diagnosis of abnormality as it is focused on observable signs that an individual is not coping e.g. lack of hygiene, clear behavioural distress signals
Checklists such as those provided by Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) can be used to assess the degree of FTFA which increases the reliability of the measure
Weaknesses
FTFA is an overly subjective measure as one person’s lack of hygiene may be another person’s eco-friendly refusal to use deodorant which means that the FTFA measure may lack validity
Some behaviours may appear to have the characteristics of FTFA but in fact are simply expressions of personal choice e.g. swimming with sharks may put a person’s life in some danger but it would be difficult to argue that their behaviour is abnormal based on this criterion alone
Is she daring, brave, intrepid, or failing to function adequately?
Deviation from social norms (DSN)
Strengths
An understanding of and adherence to what is agreed behaviour per society/culture could be said to be a guiding principle for harmonious living so this measure may help to identify behaviour which is damaging to other people and to society in general
Someone who deviates from social norms may actually be giving a ‘cry for help’ with their behaviour e.g. by continually getting into fights with strangers, so this measure could be a good way of noticing that someone is in need of some sort of intervention
Weaknesses
This measure may give rise to culture bias as some behaviours which are acceptable in one culture may be viewed adversely by another culture
This measure may be mis-used by those in power to control or quash minority groups who are do not fall in line with current policy or prevailing social mores e.g. the Suffragette and Civil Rights movements were initially ridiculed and vilified by the press and some public figures
Deviation from ideal mental health (DIMH)
Strengths
This is an holistic measure as it takes into account all facets and behaviours of a person
This measure has good application as it can be used as the basis for therapy and treatments with its emphasis on the whole person and on positive mental health and wellbeing
Weaknesses
This measure is almost impossible to live up to as it requires each individual to reach the highest levels of positive mental wellbeing (e.g. constantly self-actualising; being completely free of stress; being successful in love, work and leisure time) which may actually lead to people feeling demotivated and low in self-esteem
This measure is also prone to culture-bound syndrome as it emphasises the importance of the individual which is not aligned with the attitudes and beliefs of collectivist cultures
Ideal mental health may be possible for some…but for most people it is probably unachievable.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You might like to focus on just a couple of these measures in an exam response: sometimes it is better to cover less content but in more depth, particularly when it comes to applying Critical Thinking. You may also like to consider including a relevant example with each measure/factor to show understanding. An example can sometimes help if the explanation is not 100% precise.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?