The Use of Animals in Research (HL IB Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Claire Neeson
Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson
Overview: The Use of Animal Models in Research to Provide Insight into Human Behaviour
The use of animals in research
Around 29 million animals per year are used in experiments in the USA and the EU
Rats and mice make up around 80% of the total number of animals used in research
The use of animals in experiments has fallen by half in the past 30 years as ethical considerations have become more prominent and technology has progressed so that their use is unnecessary
Research into behaviourism drew strongly on animal models e.g. Pavlov’s dogs and classical conditioning; Skinner’s rats and operant conditioning
Animals are also widely used in the biological approach e.g. the use of pigeons, mice and rats in understanding drug tolerance and addiction
Arguments which support the use of animals to provide insight into human behaviour
Human beings are animals and it is only via experimentation that insight into particular types of behaviour can be achieved, particularly at the biochemical level of experimentation
Using human beings as participants can only go so far, due to ethical restrictions placed on the use of humans in research: this is when the use of animals as subjects is useful
There are some perceived similarities between human brains and animal brains, particularly with higher-order animals such as chimpanzees, who share 98.8% of their DNA with humans therefore this has real value as a model of human behaviour
Some animal studies involve injecting animals with hormones, lesioning part of their brain or implementing genetic modification: all techniques that would be unethical to use on humans but which may provide scientific breakthroughs
Animals in research: to use or not to use?
Arguments against the use of animals in research to provide insight into human behaviour
There are strong moral and ethical arguments for not using animals in research: causing distress to the animal; depriving the animal of their natural environment; destroying the animal for the sake of the research; using animals without considering possible alternative solutions; the assumption that an animal life is less valuable than a human life
Humans and animals share similarities but they are, clearly, not completely identical: humans are more sophisticated in terms of their cognitions, motivations and higher-order thinking than animals so the results of animal studies cannot be completely generalised to humans
Some research using animals has been prone to methodological flaws e.g. not using random allocation to conditions, not using a single‐blind design, baseline measurements being unreliable, testing the animals in the artificial environment of the lab, rather than in the wild
Research which investigates the use of animal models to provide insight into human behaviour
Rosenzweig et al. (1972): neuroplasticity in rats' brains
Fadda et al. (1996): neurotransmission in rats' brains
Shively et al. (2009): the effect of elevated cortisol on monkeys' brains
Martin et al. (2005): the role of pheromones in red-backed salamanders and territoriality
Weaver et al. (2004): epigenetic changes in rats
Lassi & Tucci (2017): gene-environment interaction and attachment in mice
Examiner Tip
Remember to offer a balanced argument when discussing or evaluating the value of animal models in research. Resist the temptation to only argue for or against their use as you will lose marks. Being overly passionate or emotional in an essay (even though you may feel justified about feeling this way) is not recommended as this is not the right forum for airing your personal views.
Worked Example
ERQ (EXTENDED RESPONSE QUESTION)
22 MARKS
The question is, ‘Discuss the value of animal models to provide insight into human behaviour’ [22]
Here is the introduction to this essay: note that it provides an overview of the topic, and gives a ‘road map’ of what the essay will cover:
Some psychological research uses animals, e.g. rats, as their subjects (only human beings are referred to as ‘participants’) in an attempt to apply the findings to human behaviour. An animal model is used in research for the purpose of better understanding behaviour without the added risk of causing harm to a human during the process for obvious ethical reasons (the protection of participants). Animals have been an important feature of psychological movements such as Behaviourism in the 1950s e.g. the reinforcement of reward on different schedules gave an insight into human gambling behaviour. Biopsychology has tested rats’ navigation of a T-maze to highlight the role of ACh in learning and memory, an insight which would not have been achievable with human participants. This essay will consider the relative value of animal models in understanding human behaviour using research by Skinner (1951) and Fadda et al. (1996).
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?