Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2014

Last exams 2024

|

Investigating Half-Life (DP IB Physics: SL)

Revision Note

Katie M

Author

Katie M

Last updated

Investigating Half-Life

Aim of the Experiment

  • The aim of the experiment is to investigate the half-life of a decaying radioactive sample
    • This can be done with a live sample if safe access is available
    • This can also be done through an online simulation

Variables

  • Independent variable = time, t
  • Dependent variable = radioactive activity, A
  • Control variables:
    • Size of sample
    • Same distance from detector to sample
    • Same material for sample

Equipment List 

 7-1-9-equipment-list

  • Resolution of equipment:
    • Metre ruler = 1 mm
    • Stopwatch = 0.01 s

Method 

7-1-9-investigating-half-life-apparatus_sl-physics-rn

  1. Measure the background radiation for 30 second intervals using a Geiger-Muller tube without the radiation source in the room, take several readings and find an average
  2. Next, put the radiation source at a set starting distance appropriate for the ionizing strength of the radiation (e.g. 1 - 2 cm for an alpha source, 2 - 5 cm for a beta source and 15 - 30 cm for a gamma source) from the GM tube
  3. If graphing software is available to use with the Geiger-Muller tube, then that should be started as soon as the source is placed in position, if not, then proceed to step 4
  4. Once the sample is in place measure the number of counts in 30-second intervals for 10 minutes or until the activity greatly decreases from the beginning value
  5. Remove sample and replace into a lead-lined box or safe storage container
  6. Repeat this for several trials if possible using fresh same size samples

A suitable table of results might look like this:

7-1-9-method-table

Analysis of Results 

  • What is important for this experiment is the initial count rate and the following decrease as the radioactive source decays from the parent nuclei into the daughter nuclei.
    • The background rate must be subtracted from the data before analysis can begin. This is true for both graphed and manual data

  • In order to see the decrease and model it, the data should be graphed with the correct count rate (background subtracted) on the y-axis and the time intervals on the x-axis. If graphing software is used then the graph should look similar to the following:

Radioactivity Fluctuations, downloadable AS & A Level Physics revision notes

  • However, if the manual method is used, then there will be twenty data points rather than a smooth curve with fluctuations
  • Using this curve, the half-life can be found by comparing the initial magnitude of the activity with the time it takes to decay to half of the original activity.
    • This can be extended by finding the time taken for two half-lives to pass and the activity to reach one quarter for quantitative comparison

Half-life Graph, downloadable IGCSE & GCSE Physics revision notes

  • Compare found half-life for the radioactive sample with the known value

Evaluation

Systematic errors:

  • The Geiger counter may suffer from an issue called “dead time”
    • This is when multiple counts happen simultaneously within ~100 μs and the counter only registers one
    • This is a more common problem in older detectors, so using a more modern Geiger counter should reduce this problem

  • If this experiment is done manually, there will be uncertainty in the time
    • This uncertainty in time intervals will mean variation in counting intervals, however, due to the 30-second interval and the nature of this experiment this is not easily accounted for
    • It is best to discuss what these uncertainties could mean for the results of this experiment

Random errors:
  • Radioactive decay is random, so repeat readings are vital in this experiment
  • Measure the count over an appropriate time span such as 30 seconds
    • A larger count helps reduce the statistical percentage uncertainty inherent in smaller readings
    • This is because the percentage error is proportional to the inverse-square root of the count
    • However, a shorter count will mean that more data points are available to help make an appropriate decay curve

Safety Considerations

  • For any radioactive source:
    • Reduce the exposure time by keeping it in a lead-lined box when not in use
    • Handle with long tongs
    • Avoid physical contact and handle the source with care
    • Do not point the source at anyone and keep a large distance (as activity reduces by an inverse square law)

  • Safety clothing such as a lab coat, gloves and goggles must be worn

Worked example

A student measures the background radiation count in a laboratory and obtains the following readings: 

7-1-9-we-investigating-half-life-question-background-counts

The student is trying to verify the half-life of a sample of Barium-137. He collects the following data for each 30 second time interval. Use this data to determine the half-life of the radioactive samples.

7-1-9-we-investigating-half-life-question-student-data-png

Step 1: Determine a mean value of background radiation per 30 second time interval

Step 2: Calculate C (corrected average count rate per 30 second time interval)

7-1-9-we-investigating-half-life-answer-step2_sl-physics-rn

Step 3: Plot a graph of C against t (time in 30-sec intervals) and add a smooth-fitting curve

7-1-9-we-investigating-half-life-answer-step3_sl-physics-rn

Step 4: Map the first three half-lives use the curve

    • The first half-life took approximately 160 seconds to occur (200 − 40 = 160)
    • The second half-life took approximately 160 seconds to be reached following the first half-life (360 − 200 = 160)
    • The third half-life took approximately 160 seconds to be reached following the second half-life (520 − 360 = 160)

    we-calculating-half-life

Step 5: Average the half-lives

(160 + 160 + 165) ÷ 3 = 160 seconds

Step 6: State the final answer

    • The final found answer was 160 seconds for the half-life of this sample data

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Katie M

Author: Katie M

Expertise: Physics

Katie has always been passionate about the sciences, and completed a degree in Astrophysics at Sheffield University. She decided that she wanted to inspire other young people, so moved to Bristol to complete a PGCE in Secondary Science. She particularly loves creating fun and absorbing materials to help students achieve their exam potential.