Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2014

Last exams 2024

|

Resolvance of Diffraction Gratings (DP IB Physics: HL)

Revision Note

Test yourself
Katie M

Author

Katie M

Last updated

Resolvance of Diffraction Gratings

  • In order to know if a diffraction grating is able to resolve two wavelengths, the resolving power of the diffraction grating must be found
    • This is based on the Rayleigh criterion as applied to diffraction gratings and their output
  • The resolving power, R, of a diffraction grating is given by:
R equals fraction numerator lambda over denominator capital delta lambda end fraction
  • Where:
    • R = the resolving power of the grating (no unit)
    • λ = the wavelength of incident light (m)
    • Δλ = the smallest difference in wavelength that the grating can resolve (m)

  • The resolving power is also equal to 

R = N × m

  • Where:
    • = the total number of slits on the diffraction grating (or those illuminated by an incident beam of light)
    • m = the order of diffraction
  • Therefore, combining the two equations gives: 
R equals fraction numerator lambda over denominator capital delta lambda end fraction equals N cross times m

Worked example

A student is using a diffraction grating to resolve two emission wavelengths from calcium in the 3rd order of the spectrum. These wavelengths are 164.99 nm and 165.20 nm.

Determine the minimum number of lines per mm needed if a beam of width 0.25 mm is incident upon the diffraction grating.

Step 1: List the known values
    • Order of diffraction, m = 3
    • Wavelength, λ1 = 164.99 nm
    • Wavelength, λ2 = 165.20 nm
    • Beam width = 0.25 mm
Step 2: Determine values for λ and Δλ
    • The value of the incident wavelength, λ, can be determined from the mean of the two wavelengths:

lambda equals fraction numerator 164.99 plus 165.20 over denominator 2 end fraction= 165.095 nm 

    • The difference between the two wavelengths, Δλ, is:

Δλ = λ2λ1 = 165.20 − 164.99 = 0.21 nm

Step 3: Find the resolving power of these wavelengths
    • The resolving power can be calculated using:
R equals fraction numerator lambda over denominator capital delta lambda end fraction


Step 4: Input the relevant values

R equals fraction numerator lambda over denominator capital delta lambda end fraction equals fraction numerator 165.095 over denominator 0.21 end fraction = 786.2

Step 5: Find the number of lines illuminated
    • The equation relating resolving power and number of slits is given by:

R = N × m

    • Rearranging for N and substituting the values for R and m:

N equals R over m equals fraction numerator 786.2 over denominator 3 end fraction= 262.1

    • The value 262.1 is the number of lines illuminated for the beam of 0.25 mm
Step 6: Find the number of lines needed per mm for this situation
    • Since 262.1 is the number of lines illuminated for the beam of 0.25 mm, then 4 times more lines must be illuminated to account for 1 mm:

262.1 × 4 = 1048.4 lines per mm

State 7: State the final answer

    • The minimum amount of lines needed per mm to resolve the relevant calcium lines is: 1049 lines per mm

Examiner Tip

In the worked example, the answer may look as though it has been rounded incorrectly but we are looking for the actual number of lines here, not fractions of lines

Rounding down to 1048 would leave the grating nearly half a line short, which can't happen, so always round up to the nearest whole number

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Katie M

Author: Katie M

Expertise: Physics

Katie has always been passionate about the sciences, and completed a degree in Astrophysics at Sheffield University. She decided that she wanted to inspire other young people, so moved to Bristol to complete a PGCE in Secondary Science. She particularly loves creating fun and absorbing materials to help students achieve their exam potential.