Impact of Population & Economic Growth on Water Quality
- The growth of the world population increases the demand for water
- Population growth is unevenly distributed and so the need for increased water supply is also uneven
- Urban areas experiencing a rapid increase in population usually experience the most water stress
- The quantity of water currently being used for all purposes is over 3700 cubic kilometres per year
- The growth of population leads to a greater demand for water for all uses:
- Agriculture
- Domestic
- Industrial
Demand for water
- Agriculture is the largest user of water:
- Consumes over two-thirds of water drawn from rivers and lakes
- Water for crop irrigation has increased by 70% since 1960
- Industry uses 22% of available water
- The domestic sector uses 8%
- These all impact on water quality and availability
- Many rivers have become polluted, which makes them unusable for human needs
INSERT IMAGE
Sources of water pollution
- Rivers which are contaminated by industrial waste can cause algae blooms
- This makes the water unsafe to be used by humans
- The toxins produced by the algae can kill wild animals and livestock
- Many fish deaths are occurring because of the increase in temperatures in rivers
- Overuse of aquifers can result in reduced water supply
- There are many examples of water quality issues around the world
- China’s rapid economic growth has meant that over 70% of the country’s rivers cannot be used for human consumption
- Lead poisoning in Flint, USA, because of industrial pollutants in the river waters
Aral Sea
- The Aral Sea is an endorheic lake which is located in Asia
- The lake is transboundary because half lies in Uzbekistan and half in Kazakhstan
- Rivers enter the lake from Amu Darya and Syr Darga
- In 1997, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change highlighted the Aral Sea as a case study for what happens when lakes are misused
- In 1960, the lake was the world’s 4th largest inland water body
Use of water
- Large-scale irrigation systems were introduced in the 1930s
- Between 1960 and 1980, the area was known for the cotton industry
- This required increased irrigation from the Amu Darya and Syr Darga rivers
- The population increased from 14.1 million in 1960 to 47 million in 2008
- According to UNESCO, there are now 51 million people living in the Aral Sea basin
- By September 2011, the lake had separated into four parts and had shrunk in area by 85% and volume by 92%
Impacts on the economy
- The fishing industry, which used to employ 40,000, collapsed
- Camel farming decreased because the grass that camels ate was too salty due to the wind blowing salt from the drying up lake
- Factories in the area which used the lake to transport their goods could no longer use the lake as a trade route, causing rising unemployment
Impacts on humans
- According to scientists, the Aral Sea could dry up in the next 20 years, which would affect drinking water supplies
- Due to highly toxic winds, there has been an increase in respiratory illnesses caused by dust from fertilizers being spread by wind
The Great Artesian Basin
- The Great Artesian Basin (GAB) is situated in central Australia
- One of the world’s largest groundwater systems, which supports a variety of ecosystems and springs
- The basin is nearly 1.7 million square kilometres
- There has been little sustainable management of the basin
- Leading to much wastage of water through evaporation and seepage
- Water wastage damages the environment through land and water salinization
- Agriculture has dominated groundwater extraction
- Water extraction for mining and oil projects has been increasing
- The Olympic Dam mining project has been extracting groundwater since 1983
Impacts on humans
- More than 180,000 people rely on the groundwater from the basin
- Over 120 towns are supported through the basin including both homes and businesses
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been using the basin for over 60,000 years
- In August 2018, the Australian government announced The Improving Great Artesian Basin Drought Resilience program worth up to $26.7 million