Case Study: Earthquakes (DP IB Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Bridgette Barrett
Reviewed by: Jenna Quinn
Case Study: Nepal
Nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of under $1000 in 2015
Located between China and India, Nepal is a landlocked country
In 2015, 80% of the population lived in rural, often remote, communities
In April 2015 at 11.26 a.m., Nepal was struck by an earthquake of magnitude 7.8
The epicentre was 80km northwest of Kathmandu in the Gorka district
The focus was shallow at only 15km beneath the surface
Over 300 aftershocks followed the main earthquake
Location of the Nepal earthquake
Cause
Nepal is located on a collision boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates
Effects
Approximately 9000 deaths
Over 20,000 people injured
Electricity and water supplies cut
7000 schools and 1000 health facilities damaged or destroyed
Almost 3.5 million people made homeless
Offices, shops and factories destroyed, meaning people unable to make a living
UNESCO world heritage sites destroyed, as well as many temples
A loss of tourist income, which Nepal is reliant on
Avalanches on Mount Everest and in the Langtang Valley
Landslides, which blocked roads and rivers
Damages estimated at between $7 and $10 billion; about 35% of the GDP
Immediate responses
There were donations of money and aid from around the world totalling $3 billion, including $3.3 million from China and $51 million from the UK
Many countries sent aid in the form of:
Temporary shelters
Medicines
Food
Water
Clothing
Search and rescue teams
Medical staff
90% of the Nepalese army were mobilised
Tent cities were set up in Kathmandu for those made homeless
A GIS crisis-mapping tool was used to co-ordinate the response
A $3 million grant was provided by the Asian Development Bank for emergency relief
Long-term responses
Landslides were cleared and roads repaired to restore access to remote rural communities
Schools were rebuilt
Earthquake drills were introduced to provide people with education about what to do in the event of an earthquake
Stricter building codes were introduced with more enforcement
$200 million was provided by the Asian Development Bank for rebuilding
A new government task force was set up to plan for future earthquake events
Factors affecting vulnerability
Vulnerability is higher in Nepal due to a range of factors:
Many people affected live in remote, rural areas, which means:
Communication and education about the risks of earthquakes are limited
In the event of a hazard these areas are difficult to reach
The city of Kathmandu is densely populated, so more people are affected
There were building codes but these were not always enforced or followed:
Buildings are often built using low-quality materials and are usually not earthquake-resistant
Nepal is a mountainous area, which increases the risk of landslides and avalanches
There is a lack of education regarding the risks of earthquakes
Case Study: New Zealand
New Zealand is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, with a Gross Domestic Product of US$40,058 in 2016
It is located to the south-east of Australia
On 14th November 2016, it was struck by a magnitude 7.8 earthquake
The epicentre was 15km north-east of Culverden and 60km south-west of Kaikōura
The focus was shallow, only 15km below the surface
By the 17th November, there had been over 2000 aftershocks
Location of the New Zealand earthquake
Cause
New Zealand is located on a destructive boundary between the Indian-Australian and Pacific plates
Effects
Two deaths
Over 50 people injured
Temporary homelessness of 60 people
Over 2000 buildings were damaged or destroyed, including some in the capital city, Wellington
Power, water and telecommunication cut off to Kaikōura and surrounding communities
Approximately 11,000 landslides:
Destruction of 390km of road and railway
Kaikōura and surrounding communities were completely cut off for 16 days
Uplift of the coastline by 5.5 metres in some areas:
Kaikōura's harbour was affected by the uplift, meaning boats could not leave or enter the harbour
Disruption of the coastal breeding areas for dolphins, seals and sea birds
A tsunami followed the earthquake, reaching up to 6.9 metres in Goose Bay
Insurance costs reached $2.27 billion
The cost to the government reached almost $3.5 billion
Immediate responses
National Crisis Management Centre activated
Tsunami warnings were issued for coastal areas via sirens, texts and social media
Local states of emergency declared
Helicopters and ships provided emergency supplies and evacuated vulnerable people
Search and rescue teams dispatched
Long-term responses
Improvements to the tsunami warning procedure
Road routes were repaired between one month and one year after the event
The main rail route reopened after two months but full repair took over a year
Improvements to the building regulations made to assess existing buildings for earthquake resistance
Kaikōura's harbour was rebuilt; taking over a year to complete
Factors affecting vulnerability
The vulnerability of the population is reduced due to a range of factors, including:
Planning and preparation for earthquake events
Education about what to do during and after an earthquake event
Emergency services are well-trained and equipped
People at risk were rapidly evacuated from the affected areas
Building quality and materials are of a high standard, reducing the risk of collapse
As a HIC, New Zealand can afford the repairs and rebuilding, reducing recovery time
A tsunami warning system gives people time to evacuate from areas at risk
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?