Case Study: Earthquakes (DP IB Geography)

Revision Note

Case Study: Nepal

  • Nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of under $1000 in 2015

  • Located between China and India, Nepal is a landlocked country

  • In 2015, 80% of the population lived in rural, often remote, communities

  • In April 2015 at 11.26 a.m., Nepal was struck by an earthquake of magnitude 7.8

  • The epicentre was 80km northwest of Kathmandu in the Gorka district

  • The focus was shallow at only 15km beneath the surface

  • Over 300 aftershocks followed the main earthquake

Location of the Nepal earthquake

Map showing the 2015 Nepal Earthquake impact with perceived shaking levels, epicenter in Kathmandu, plates, fault line, aftershock, and Mt. Everest location.
Location of the Nepal earthquake

Cause 

  • Nepal is located on a collision boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates

Effects

  • Approximately 9000 deaths 

  • Over 20,000 people injured

  • Electricity and water supplies cut

  • 7000 schools and 1000 health facilities damaged or destroyed

  • Almost 3.5 million people made homeless

  • Offices, shops and factories destroyed, meaning people unable to make a living

  • UNESCO world heritage sites destroyed, as well as many temples

  • A loss of tourist income, which Nepal is reliant on

  • Avalanches on Mount Everest and in the Langtang Valley

  • Landslides, which blocked roads and rivers

  • Damages estimated at between $7 and $10 billion; about 35% of the GDP

Immediate responses

  • There were donations of money and aid from around the world totalling $3 billion, including $3.3 million from China and $51 million from the UK 

  • Many countries sent aid in the form of:

    • Temporary shelters

    • Medicines

    • Food

    • Water

    • Clothing

    • Search and rescue teams

    • Medical staff

  • 90% of the Nepalese army were mobilised 

  • Tent cities were set up in Kathmandu for those made homeless

  • A GIS crisis-mapping tool was used to co-ordinate the response

  • A $3 million grant was provided by the Asian Development Bank for emergency relief

Long-term responses

  • Landslides were cleared and roads repaired to restore access to remote rural communities

  • Schools were rebuilt

  • Earthquake drills were introduced to provide people with education about what to do in the event of an earthquake

  • Stricter building codes were introduced with more enforcement

  • $200 million was provided by the Asian Development Bank for rebuilding

  • A new government task force was set up to plan for future earthquake events 

Factors affecting vulnerability

  • Vulnerability is higher in Nepal due to a range of factors:

    • Many people affected live in remote, rural areas, which means:

      • Communication and education about the risks of earthquakes are limited

      • In the event of a hazard these areas are difficult to reach 

    • The city of Kathmandu is densely populated, so more people are affected

    • There were building codes but these were not always enforced or followed:

      • Buildings are often built using low-quality materials and are usually not earthquake-resistant

    • Nepal is a mountainous area, which increases the risk of landslides and avalanches

    • There is a lack of education regarding the risks of earthquakes 

Case Study: New Zealand

  • New Zealand is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, with a Gross Domestic Product of US$40,058 in 2016

  • It is located to the south-east of Australia

  • On 14th November 2016, it was struck by a magnitude 7.8 earthquake

  • The epicentre was 15km north-east of Culverden and 60km south-west of Kaikōura

  • The focus was shallow, only 15km below the surface

  • By the 17th November, there had been over 2000 aftershocks

Location of the New Zealand earthquake

Map of New Zealand showing tremor intensity from light to severe. Highlighted cities: Wellington, Kaikoura, Christchurch. Intensity key ranges from light (grey) to severe (dark red).
Location of the New Zealand earthquake

Cause

  • New Zealand is located on a destructive boundary between the Indian-Australian and Pacific plates

Effects

  • Two deaths 

  • Over 50 people injured

  • Temporary homelessness of 60 people

  • Over 2000 buildings were damaged or destroyed, including some in the capital city, Wellington

  • Power, water and telecommunication cut off to Kaikōura and surrounding communities

  • Approximately 11,000 landslides:

    • Destruction of 390km of road and railway

    • Kaikōura and surrounding communities were completely cut off for 16 days

  • Uplift of the coastline by 5.5 metres in some areas:

    • Kaikōura's harbour was affected by the uplift, meaning boats could not leave or enter the harbour

    • Disruption of the coastal breeding areas for dolphins, seals and sea birds

  • A tsunami followed the earthquake, reaching up to 6.9 metres in Goose Bay

  • Insurance costs reached $2.27 billion

  • The cost to the government reached almost $3.5 billion

Immediate responses

  • National Crisis Management Centre activated 

  • Tsunami warnings were issued for coastal areas via sirens, texts and social media

  • Local states of emergency declared

  • Helicopters and ships provided emergency supplies and evacuated vulnerable people 

  • Search and rescue teams dispatched 

Long-term responses

  • Improvements to the tsunami warning procedure 

  • Road routes were repaired between one month and one year after the event

  • The main rail route reopened after two months but full repair took over a year

  • Improvements to the building regulations made to assess existing buildings for earthquake resistance

  • Kaikōura's harbour was rebuilt; taking over a year to complete

Factors affecting vulnerability

  • The vulnerability of the population is reduced due to a range of factors, including:

    • Planning and preparation for earthquake events

    • Education about what to do during and after an earthquake event

    • Emergency services are well-trained and equipped

    • People at risk were rapidly evacuated from the affected areas

    • Building quality and materials are of a high standard, reducing the risk of collapse

    • As a HIC, New Zealand can afford the repairs and rebuilding, reducing recovery time

    • A tsunami warning system gives people time to evacuate from areas at risk

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.

Jenna Quinn

Author: Jenna Quinn

Expertise: Head of New Subjects

Jenna studied at Cardiff University before training to become a science teacher at the University of Bath specialising in Biology (although she loves teaching all three sciences at GCSE level!). Teaching is her passion, and with 10 years experience teaching across a wide range of specifications – from GCSE and A Level Biology in the UK to IGCSE and IB Biology internationally – she knows what is required to pass those Biology exams.