Population Policies (DP IB Geography)
Revision Note
Ageing Populations
Ageing populations have multiple impacts:
Increase costs on residential accommodation, social services, health care, and pensions
Services such as schools, sports centres, etc. decline as they are not used by older residents
Family budgets can increase if looking after an aged relative
There is an increase in the dependency ratio because of a smaller working population
A smaller workforce means less tax paid to the government leading to less money available to the younger population for education, transport, social amenities etc.
Ageing populations can also present opportunities such as:
Lower costs on policing as crime rates reduce
New market/business opportunities
In HICs, the elderly are an important market, known as the 'grey economy'
Firms now cater to this market through holidays (SAGA), mobility aids, health care workers etc.
Increased opportunities for volunteering and community activism as elderly people have experience
Longer working lives and contribution to society
More time can be spent with friends and family and providing care for family members
In Japan and South Africa, there is a 'granny culture', where the elderly look after their grandchildren, allowing both parents to work
Japan's 'super-aged' population
More than 1 in 10 people in Japan are now aged 80+, and there are approximately 80 000 centenarians (100+ years)
This makes Japan the country with the world's oldest population
By 2036, people 65+ years will represent 33% of the population
Japan has a low birth rate and struggles to provide for its ageing population
In 2022, almost half of Japanese firms relied on workers aged 70+
Farmers are also ageing and Japan's farming population is shrinking and the agricultural sector faces a severe labour shortage
A shrinking child population is forcing local governments around Japan to close its schools
The decrease in the size of the youth population reduces competition among young people
Japan's policies
The government has tried to boost its birth rates
But, with the cost of living, and long working hours, there has been little success
The pandemic only worsened the issues, leading to more deaths, and fewer marriages and births
Japan created the 'Angel Plan' aimed to help couples raise their children by:
Increasing policies and programmes for paid parental leave, childcare services and child allowances
In 2019, free preschool education and day-care for children aged 3-5 was introduced
In 2020, the government increased support by:
Reduces the cost of fertility treatment
Raised child allowances
Expanded free higher education
Introduced higher allowances for paternity leave - at present Japan has a generous paid parental leave of up to 24 months
But so far, these policies have not improved Japan's low fertility rate of 1.36 births per woman
Improve immigration
Japan has a strict immigration policy
Migrants are considered temporary 'guest workers' who will eventually return home
Many Japanese firms resist hiring foreign workers
In 2018, new legislation allowed foreign workers with vocational skills to stay in the country for up to 5 years, but could not bring their families
If the foreign worker had advanced skills, then they were allowed to bring their families and live in the country indefinitely
In June 2023, just 2.4% of the total Japanese population were foreign residents (3.2 million people)
This also applies to refugees, where just 202 people were granted refugee status out of 3,772 people who applied in 2022
Create an 'age-free' society
Japan is looking at creating an 'age-free society' where people are not categorised by their age, but by their ability and motivation to work
They are encouraging employers to:
Keep their employees up to the age of 70 or longer
Hire older people
Extent their retirement age
Increase opportunities for older people
Pro-natalist Policies
Pro-natalist policies are adopted when a country suffers from a declining and ageing population
A pro-natalist policy is:
'A policy implemented to increase the population through encouraging births and instilling a culture of reproduction through incentives'
Pro-natalist policies improve the replacement level of a country's population where it has fallen below the recommended 2.1 children per woman
Pro-natalist policies are associated with HICs because:
They need financial and developmental support to be successful
LICs tend to have a youthful population with few aged people
The biggest issue with the pro-natalist policy is the cost to the government
Russia's pro-natalist policy
Russia has a low fertility rate of 1.5 births per woman due to:
Poor reproductive healthcare services
A lack of access to contraceptives
A high divorce rate
An ageing population
High rates of abortion
Women choosing to have less children
First pro-natalist policy was in 1936 where families were rewarded for having 3 or more children
The State increased its help to pregnant women, large families and single mothers
Abortion was a criminal offence
Childless families were penalised with a tax of 6.6% on the family's income (until 1990)
In 1981, Russia reduced the childbearing age and closed contraceptive factories
Fertility rates did not increase, but the rate of illegal abortions did
By 2006, the fertility rate was just 1.3 births per woman and further measures were introduced:
Women with large families were called 'Hero Mothers' and were given medals and gifts
Offered increased child benefits and longer maternity leave for women
If women gave up work they were offered 40% of what they had previously earned
Payments of 250,000 Russian Roubles (approx. US$9,200) were made to women who give birth to a second/third child, which could be used for domestic or educational purposes
Another plan offered an all-expense-paid summer camp for young adults, complete with private tents and no condoms
The government also considered the re-introduction of the childless tax
'Day of Conception' September 12 2006 Putin announced that 'citizens are relieved of work and are encouraged to use their afternoons to copulate and if a child is born on June 12th 2007, the couple will receive cars, TVs and other prizes'
The results were:
Birth rates rose by 4.5% from 1,479,600 (2006) to 1,610,000 in 2007
By 2011 the fertility rate was 1.54, a 21% increase
The increase in 2nd births was 40% and 60% for a third child
However, these increases were short-lived and the effects of the policies have worn-off
Women's intentions to have another child haven't happened
Anti-natalist Policies
The aim of anti-natalist policies is to reduce pressure on resources and improve the quality of life for the whole population
These are policies introduced to reduce the birth rate
Policies can be law - as in China - or they can be voluntary
China's policy
The Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) was a 5 year economic plan to improve the prosperity of China through:
Widespread industrialisation
agricultural collectivism
Families were rewarded by the number of workers they had, encouraging couples to have larger families
But it resulted in the deaths of millions of Chinese due to famine
The rapidly increasing population resulted in limited resources, such as food, housing, education and healthcare
A lack of jobs meant many poor people could not afford to pay taxes, which the government needed to create facilities for the growing population
By the early 1970s, China was once again heading into a famine, unless the government brought changes
China's one-child policy came into effect in 1979 and ended in 2016, although it was relaxed in 1999
It stated that:
Couples must not marry until their late 20s
Can only have one successful pregnancy
Must be sterilised after the first child or abort any future pregnancies
Would receive a 5-10% salary rise for limiting their family to one child
Increased access to contraceptives and family planning
Better employment opportunities for one-child families
Abortion to be legalised
The punishments for disobeying the rules were:
A 10% salary cut
A fine so large that it would bankrupt most households
The family would have to pay for the education of both children and health care for all the family
Second children born abroad were not penalised, but could not become Chinese citizens
The policy was stricter in urban areas
Exceptions were:
Ethnic minorities were allowed two children
Rural families were allowed two children particularly if the first was a girl
Urban couples could have a second child, but only if both parents were single children
Multiple births (twins etc.) were not penalised and many women took fertility drugs to have multiple births
The policy is estimated to have reduced population growth, however, it has also created issues
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
It's estimated that 400 million fewer people have been born | Women were forced to have abortions, even as late as the ninth-month of the pregnancy |
The famine which was predicted never occurred | Women were placed under pressure from families, friends, the ''granny police'' and their own conscience and feelings |
Population growth has slowed enough for people to have enough food and jobs | 'Little Emperor' syndrome where only children were spoilt |
The population growth rate has decreased by more than 10% since the policy was introduced | Chinese society has a preference for sons, resulting in female infanticide or girls being placed in orphanages |
Population should peak at 1.5 billion | Local officials and central government had power over people's private lives |
The biggest impacts of the policy have been:
A shrinking labour force - working dependency of 1.6 adults,
An ageing population of nearly 450 million people aged 60+
A gender imbalance of 118 males to 100 females - roughly 30 million more men struggling to find a wife
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?