Systems Approach (DP IB Geography)
Revision Note
Comparison of Energy Efficiency & Water Footprints in Food Production
The systems approach looks at all components, relationships and feedback effects within a process
The approach is useful for showing whether the impacts in one area of the system have consequences on another
Food production is a system:
Inputs - things that enter the system
Human inputs like labour, money, and technology
Physical inputs like land, soil, seeds and water
Transfers/processes/stores - the operations that occur during food production, turning inputs into outputs
Weeding, ploughing, sowing, milking, rearing, shearing etc.
Decision-making by states and farmers
Changes and patterns in land use
Outputs - the products (the end of the system)
Positive outputs - crops, milk, eggs, animal fodder, profits/wealth
Negative outputs - waste, air/water/land pollution, soil erosion
The system may also have feedback effects:
Positive feedback - imbalanced equilibrium with stagnation, decline or complete loss of the system
Natural disasters may also impact positive feedback
Negative feedback - return to equilibrium with increased reinvestment and innovation
Food systems can be intensive or extensive
Intensive systems:
Capital intensive - high capital and low labour inputs
Labour intensive - low capital and high labour inputs
Profit oriented
The land is relatively small
Output is high
Extensive systems:
Small labour and capital inputs
Rely on natural characteristics e.g. rainfall and soil quality
The land is larger
Fewer agricultural technologies
Output is low
Subsistence oriented
Advantages of the systems approach
The systems approach can compare energy efficiency and the water footprint within food production systems
There are many different types of farms/food production systems
Each food production system will have different energy efficiency and water footprints
Types of food production systems
Type of farming | Characteristics |
---|---|
Arable | Crop growth, like barley or wheat |
Pastoral | Rearing animals/livestock e.g. ranching |
Mixed | Growing crops and rearing animals simultaneously |
Commercial | Profit-oriented - produce is sold on markets e.g. coffee or cotton |
Subsistence | Growing crops/rearing livestock purely for the farmer and family |
Sedentary | Use of the same land each year e.g. maize or sugarcane |
Nomadic | Herding of livestock to find new grazing pastures (moving from one place to another) |
Energy efficiency
Modern food systems require man-made technologies and resources to function
These may need large energy inputs to operate
The Energy Efficiency Ratio measures the energy efficiency of a system
It is calculated by:
Total outputs ÷ total inputs
Inputs can be:
Direct e.g. fuel, labour, machinery, planting
Indirect e.g. irrigation, electricity, fertilisers and pesticides
Energy efficiency can be affected by:
Climate
Warmer climates are more efficient. Crops will need fewer energy resources (they can use the sun)
Wetter climates are more efficient as they need less irrigation
Soil type
Some soils are not fertile and require more fertilisers
Crop type
Certain crop types need more energy
Topography
Flatter topographies use less energy as there is lower water/nutrient runoff
Farming type
Certain farming types may be less energy-efficient than others
Use of technology
Greenhouses use more energy than cultivating open land
The energy efficiency ratio is useful for showing the efficiency of different food production systems
However, it ignores energy use in other areas of production e.g. packaging, processing, distribution and consumer preparation before consumption
Water footprint
All food systems require embedded water to operate
Agriculture uses roughly 85% of global water consumption
The water footprint can be calculated by summing up all the water used in the system
It includes the consumption and pollution of freshwater (inputs and outputs)
Water is separated into 3 categories:
Green - water from rainfall that is evaporated, transpired or stored in the soil or used by crops
Blue - water from surface/groundwater sources that evaporates, is used for a product or is returned to another source e.g. for irrigation
Grey - sources of water pollution into freshwater through pipes or from indirect leaching/runoff
Factors affecting the water footprint include:
Climate
Wetter climates require less irrigation
Topography
Fewer pollutants from runoff on flatter land
Type of food production system
Meat production requires more water than vegetable growth
Pastoral farming has a higher water footprint than arable farming
Certain crops may need more fertiliser or pesticides (this may cause more pollution)
The water footprint is useful for showing the sustainability of different food production methods
It can be used to assess and produce more sustainable methods of water use
Sustainability of Food Production
Food production is negatively affecting our environment
Agrochemicals cause pollution of land and water
Farming contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, e.g. methane
Deforestation and wetland clearing damages ecosystems and habitats
Sustainable agriculture is a method of food production, which will sustain current and future generations, without damaging the environment
It maintains agricultural productivity, reduces environmental damage and maintains resources for the future
The systems approach is useful for showing the relative sustainability of food production in different areas and each part of the system
Many ‘sustainable’ solutions focus on parts of systems, instead of the system as a whole
Agricultural policies are in place to support farmers in adopting environmentally friendly techniques
These mainly focus on protecting biodiversity, whilst ignoring issues like pollution, soil degradation and lower yields
This means the whole system isn’t taken into account
Using a systems approach means that sustainable solutions can benefit all parts of the system
This means considering the economy and the environment in inputs, processes and outputs
Examiner Tip
Think about other sustainable agricultural solutions and consider the systems approach. Do those solutions benefit all parts of the system, or just one?
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?