Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2015
Last exams 2025
Carrying Capacity (DP IB Environmental Systems & Societies (ESS))
Revision Note
Written by: Alistair Marjot
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Carrying Capacity
The maximum stable population size of a species that an ecosystem can support is known as the carrying capacity
Every individual within a species population has the potential to reproduce and have offspring that will contribute to population growth
In reality, however, there are many abiotic and biotic factors that prevent every individual in a population from making it to adulthood and reproducing
This ensures the population size of each species is limited at some point (i.e. the carrying capacity of that species is reached)
This is why no single species has a population size that dominates all other species populations on Earth, with the exception of humans (as we have managed to overcome many of the abiotic and biotic factors that could potentially limit the population growth of our species)
The graph below shows the population growth of a population of lions
The point at which the graph starts to flatten out (plateau) is the carrying capacity of this population
At this point, the environmental (abiotic and biotic) factors that stop all individuals from surviving and reproducing result in the population no longer being able to grow in size
An example graph showing the population growth of a population of lions and the point at which the carrying capacity of this population has almost been reached
Carrying capacity is determined by factors such as:
Resource availability
Interactions between species
Environmental conditions
Resource Availability
The carrying capacity of an environment for a species is influenced by the availability of essential resources such as food, water, shelter, and space
For example, a grassland ecosystem may have a carrying capacity for a specific number of herbivores based on the amount of grasses available for grazing
Interactions Between Species
The presence of predator-prey relationships, competition for resources, and symbiotic interactions among species can influence the carrying capacity of an environment
For example, the carrying capacity of a freshwater ecosystem for fish species may be influenced by the presence of predators, availability of prey, and competition for food resources
In a stable community, the numbers of predators and prey rise and fall in cycles, limiting the carrying capacity of both predator and prey populations
The graph below demonstrates some of the key patterns of predator-prey cycles:
The number of predators increases as there is more prey available
The number of prey then decreases as there are now more predators
The number of predators decreases as there is now less prey available
The number of prey increases as there are now fewer predators
The cycle now repeats
An example of a graph used to model a predator-prey cycle between the Canadian lynx and the snowshoe hare
Environmental Conditions
Factors like climate, temperature, rainfall patterns, and soil fertility can affect the carrying capacity of species within an environment
For example, a forest ecosystem with favourable environmental conditions may have a higher carrying capacity for a certain bird species due to the availability of suitable nesting sites (e.g. the temperature, humidity and rainfall is suitable for incubating eggs and raising chicks)
Estimating Carrying Capacity
Scientists use various methods to estimate the carrying capacity of an environment for a given species
These methods include field observations, population surveys, mathematical modelling, and data analysis
By studying population trends, resource availability, and species interactions, researchers can make informed estimates of carrying capacity
However, estimating carrying capacity becomes challenging when it comes to human populations due to several reasons:
Technological advancements:
Human societies have the ability to modify their environment and overcome traditional carrying capacity limitations through technology
For example, the development of agriculture and irrigation techniques has allowed humans to increase food production and support larger populations beyond what the natural environment could sustain
Cultural and social factors:
Human population dynamics are influenced by cultural norms, social behaviours, and economic factors
These can affect fertility rates and migration patterns, for example, making it difficult to accurately predict or estimate carrying capacity for human populations
Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns:
Human populations are characterised by varying lifestyles and consumption rates, which can significantly impact resource demands and environmental impacts
For example, urbanised societies with high levels of consumption may strain the carrying capacity of their surrounding areas due to increased resource demands and waste generation
Adaptive capacity:
More so than any other species, humans have the ability to adapt and innovate in response to changing environmental conditions
This adaptability can affect carrying capacity by influencing resource use efficiency and the development of technological solutions
Balancing Population and Resources
The concept of population growth dynamics refers to how humans interact with their environment to change in number over space and time
The global population has grown exponentially over the past 200 years
In 1800 it was 1 billion
In November 2022 it reached 8 billion
Due to humans’ ability to resist the limiting environmental factors (such as disease and food supply)
Humans have overcome these by finding medicines and vaccines to reduce or control rates of disease, and developing technologies to increase food supply to allow for population growth
Continued population growth puts pressure on scarce resources
The balance between population and resource use determines a place’s standard of living
Careful management of population and resources is needed to maximise income per capita
Countries aim to achieve a perfect balance between population and resources, known as optimum population
An imbalance between population and resources leads to overpopulation or underpopulation
The relationship between population, resources and standard of living
If resources are consumed at sustainable rates, a larger population may be supported
Countries going through industrialisation tend to consume and waste resources at unsustainable levels which leads to a lower carrying capacity
Technological innovation can either lead to:
Increases in supply of resources such as energy and minerals, increasing carrying capacity
Or:
Improved resource use efficiency, increasing carrying capacity
Wealthier countries usually have a larger carrying capacity than poorer countries because:
They export waste to poorer countries
They import products from poorer countries
This means that although poorer countries use fewer resources, they are supporting the resource use of the richer countries
Two different scenarios showing population response to carrying capacity
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?