Investment Appraisal (DP IB Business Management: HL): Exam Questions

1 hour19 questions
12 marks

Case Study

Orion Robotics Ltd manufactures industrial robots for warehouse automation. The company is considering investing $450,000 in new production equipment that would generate constant annual net cash flows of $90,000. It will use the payback period to assess the investment.

Define the term 'payback period'.

Did this page help you?

22 marks

Case Study

Sunrise Solar PLC, a renewable energy company, plans to install solar panels in commercial buildings across Southeast Asia. For 2024, SSP has identified two potential projects with different payback periods.

State two advantages of using the payback period method.

Did this page help you?

32 marks

Case Study

Pacific Shipping Corporation operates container vessels across Asia. In 2024, PSC is considering two expansion projects: purchasing a new vessel or upgrading port facilities. It will use the average rate of return method to compare the projects.

State two advantages of using the Average Rate of Return (ARR) to compare investments.

Did this page help you?

42 marks

Case Study

Qatar Healthcare Group operates medical facilities across the Middle East. For 2024, QHG is using the ARR to analyse investment proposals for new diagnostic equipment.

State two disadvantages of using ARR to compare investment options.

Did this page help you?

52 marks

Case Study

Global Cargo Hubs Plc is evaluating international infrastructure projects. When analysing a proposal for a potential airport development, GIH uses the net present value (NPV) approach.

Define the term 'Net Present Value' (NPV).

Did this page help you?

62 marks

Case Study

Nordic Wind Power AS develops offshore wind farms in Scandinavia. The company uses discount factors and the net present value (NPV) to evaluate long-term projects.

State two advantages of using NPV to compare investment options.

Did this page help you?

72 marks

Case Study

Malaysian Tech Solutions develops software applications. In 2024, MTS must consider non-financial factors when evaluating investments.

State two non-financial factors affecting investment decisions.

Did this page help you?

82 marks

Case Study

TechFlow, a start-up software company, is considering investing in a new AI tool for £50,000. It wants to calculate the simple payback period to determine how quickly it will recover its investment, as cash flow is a key priority.

Explain one reason why TechFlow might use the simple payback period to evaluate its investment.

Did this page help you?

14 marks

Case Study

SolarTech Panels is a company specialising in solar energy solutions for residential and commercial properties. The business is considering investing £500,000 in a new production facility to meet increasing demand for solar panels.

The new facility is expected to generate net cash inflows of £150,000 per year for five years. SolarTech is evaluating the investment using the simple payback period and average rate of return (ARR) methods. Additionally, management is factoring in qualitative aspects, such as the environmental benefits of expanding solar energy production and aligning with its corporate social responsibility goals.

Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of using the simple payback period method to evaluate SolarTech Panels’ investment.

Did this page help you?

24 marks

Case Study

SolarTech Panels is a company specialising in solar energy solutions for residential and commercial properties. The business is considering investing £500,000 in a new production facility to meet increasing demand for solar panels.

The new facility is expected to generate net cash inflows of £150,000 per year for five years. SolarTech is evaluating the investment using the simple payback period and average rate of return (ARR) methods. Additionally, management is factoring in qualitative aspects, such as the environmental benefits of expanding solar energy production and aligning with its corporate social responsibility goals.

Describe two factors SolarTech Panels should consider when evaluating its investment in the new production facility.

Did this page help you?

34 marks

Case Study

Fresh Spring Foods produces premium organic snacks for health-conscious consumers. The company is evaluating an investment of £300,000 in automated packaging machinery to increase production efficiency. The machinery is expected to generate annual net cash inflows of £80,000 for the next six years.

Fresh Spring is using the Net Present Value (NPV) method to evaluate the investment. Management is also considering qualitative factors, such as the potential to reduce waste and improve the company’s reputation for sustainability. However, they are aware of the complexity of forecasting long-term cash flows and the challenge of choosing the appropriate discount rate.

Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of using the Net Present Value (NPV) method to evaluate Fresh Spring Foods’ investment.

Did this page help you?

46 marks

Case Study

Fresh Spring Foods produces premium organic snacks for health-conscious consumers. The company is evaluating an investment of £300,000 in automated packaging machinery to increase production efficiency. The machinery is expected to generate annual net cash inflows of £80,000 for the next six years.

Fresh Spring is using the Net Present Value (NPV) method to evaluate the investment. Management is also considering qualitative factors, such as the potential to reduce waste and improve the company’s reputation for sustainability. However, they are aware of the complexity of forecasting long-term cash flows and the challenge of choosing the appropriate discount rate.

Analyse two advantages and one disadvantage to Fresh Spring Foods of prioritising qualitative factors in its decision to invest in automated packaging machinery.

Did this page help you?

54 marks

Case Study

EcoHabitat Homes designs and builds eco-friendly modular housing. The company is considering an investment of £400,000 in new technology to improve its construction processes. The technology is projected to generate annual net cash inflows of £120,000 over the next five years.

EcoHabitat is evaluating the investment using the Net Present Value (NPV) method. Management is also considering non-financial factors, such as the potential to enhance its sustainability credentials and support its mission to reduce environmental impact. The company is keen to balance financial metrics with qualitative benefits while ensuring the investment aligns with its long-term strategic goals.

Describe two factors EcoHabitat Homes should consider when selecting the appropriate discount rate for its NPV calculation.

Did this page help you?

66 marks

Case Study

EcoHabitat Homes designs and builds eco-friendly modular housing. The company is considering an investment of £400,000 in new technology to improve its construction processes. The technology is projected to generate annual net cash inflows of £120,000 over the next five years.

EcoHabitat is evaluating the investment using the Net Present Value (NPV) method. Management is also considering non-financial factors, such as the potential to enhance its sustainability credentials and support its mission to reduce environmental impact. The company is keen to balance financial metrics with qualitative benefits while ensuring the investment aligns with its long-term strategic goals.

Analyse two advantages and one disadvantage to EcoHabitat Homes of using the Average Rate of Return (ARR) instead of the Net Present Value (NPV) to determine whether its investment in new technology is worthwhile.

Did this page help you?

7
Sme Calculator
2 marks

Case Study

EcoHeat Ltd manufactures energy-efficient heating systems for residential properties. The company is considering investing in new production machinery costing $120,000. The expected net cash flows from the machinery vary over the next five years due to seasonal demand. Management wants to determine how quickly the investment will pay for itself.

Annual net cash flow:

Year 1

($)

Year 2 ($)

Year 3 ($)

Year 4 ($)

Year 5 ($)

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

18,000

Cumulative net cash flow:

Year 1

($)

Year 2 ($)

Year 3 ($)

Year 4 ($)

Year 5 ($)

35,000

65,000

90,000

110,000

128,000

Calculate the payback period for EcoHeat Ltd’s investment (show all your working).

Did this page help you?

8
Sme Calculator
2 marks

Case Study

BrightPrint Ltd specialises in producing high-quality business cards and marketing materials. The company is considering an investment of $120,000 in new printing equipment to improve efficiency and expand capacity. The expected total returns from the investment over five years are $210,000. BrightPrint also expects to incur an annual maintenance cost of $5,000 for the new equipment.

Investment Details

Amount ($)

Initial Investment

120,000

Total Returns Over 5 Years

210,000

Annual Maintenance Costs

5,000

Expected Lifespan of Equipment

5 Years

Calculate the average rate of return (ARR) for BrightPrint Ltd’s investment (show all your working).

Did this page help you?

9
Sme Calculator
2 marks

Case Study

SolarBright Ltd manufactures solar-powered lighting solutions for residential and commercial use. The company is considering investing in a new production line costing $250,000. The investment is expected to generate returns over five years. An 8% discount rate has been applied to calculate the discounted cash flows, reflecting inflation and opportunity cost. Management wants to determine if the project is financially viable. The discounted cashflows are:

Year 1 ($)

Year 2 ($)

Year 3 ($)

Year 4 ($)

Year 5 ($)

65,100

68,800

67,150

66,600

64,600

Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) for SolarBright Ltd’s investment (show all your working).

Did this page help you?

110 marks

Case Study

SwiftSnacks runs a network of vending machines that sells healthy snacks and drinks in office buildings and schools. The company was started five years ago and has grown quickly. It now operates over 500 vending machines in city areas. SwiftSnacks’ goal is “to make healthy choices easy and affordable”. Customers like the company’s focus on nutritious options, but the business faces several challenges as it grows

One of the main problems is inconsistent stock management. Some vending machines run out of popular products (stockouts), while others have too much stock, leading to waste. These issues upset customers and reduce profits. SwiftSnacks is thinking about installing automated stock control systems. These systems would track sales in real time and send alerts when a machine needs restocking. This could reduce waste and improve customer satisfaction, but the system would cost $300,000 upfront

SwiftSnacks is also considering outsourcing the job of restocking machines to a logistics company. This could save time and allow SwiftSnacks to focus on choosing and marketing products. However, outsourcing might mean less control over quality and reliability, which could harm the company’s reputation

Recent changes in how people work and study are also affecting the business. Many office workers now work remotely or part-time in the office, which has reduced demand for vending machines in office buildings. At the same time, demand in schools has increased due to new rules encouraging healthier snacks for students. To adjust for these trends, SwiftSnacks is testing a subscription service for remote workers. This would allow customers to receive snack boxes delivered to their homes

SwiftSnacks is reviewing how to fund its ideas. The automated stock system would cost a lot upfront but could save money over time by reducing waste and restocking trips. Outsourcing would cost less initially but involves ongoing fees. Management is using investment appraisal methods such as the payback period to decide which option makes the most sense for the business

Table 1: Financial data (2023)

Metric

Value ($)

Revenue

3.2m

Operating costs

2.45m

Net profit

450,000

Cash reserves

300,000

Automated stock system cost

320,000

Table 2: Demand trends (2023)

Location type

Demand change

Key reason

Offices

Decrease

More people working remotely or part-time

Schools

Increase

Rules promoting healthier snacks

Remote workers

New trend

Subscription service pilot

Table 3: Production Metrics (2023)

Metric

Value

Stockouts (monthly)

20% of machines

Wastage from overstocking

10% of stock

Average units restocked daily

200 units per employee

Discuss two implications of investing in an automated stock control system for SwiftSnacks.

Did this page help you?

210 marks

Case Study

EcoHabitat Homes designs and builds eco-friendly modular housing. The company operates from a single location in Canada and employs 12 staff members, including one engineer, one designer and four production operatives. EcoHabitat is committed to providing sustainable housing solutions, using recycled materials and energy-efficient designs to meet customer needs

The company’s modular homes are designed for eco-conscious families, small property developers and commercial clients, such as schools and offices. Customers value EcoHabitat’s ability to customise designs while maintaining high environmental standards

EcoHabitat is considering investing $600,000 in new construction technology to improve production processes. This technology is expected to reduce variable costs by 15% per unit while increasing efficiency. Management believes this investment will enhance EcoHabitat’s reputation as a leader in sustainable construction while supporting the company's long-term growth

The company’s current breakeven point is 17 units per year, but the new technology is expected to lower this to approximately 14.8 units per year. EcoHabitat’s objective is to produce 32 units annually, which would significantly exceed the breakeven output and improve profitability

EcoHabitat is also evaluating the broader impact of the investment. The technology aligns with its sustainability goals by reducing waste and energy use, which could attract eco-conscious customers. However, management is cautious about committing significant resources during uncertain economic conditions and potential implementation delays. By balancing financial metrics and qualitative benefits, EcoHabitat aims to make a decision that supports its strategic objectives

Table 1: Breakeven analysis (current and projected)

Metric

Current amount

Projected amount

Fixed costs (annual) ($)

350,000

350,000

Variable cost (per unit) ($)

20,600

17,510

Selling price (per unit) ($)

40,250

40,250

Contribution (per unit) ($)

19,650

22,740

Breakeven output (number of units)

17.81

14.84

Table 2: Investment impact summary

Factor

Details

Target market

Eco-conscious families, small developers, schools and offices

Location

Single location in Canada

Workforce

12 staff members, including one engineer, one designer and four production operatives

Potential cost savings

15% reduction in variable costs per unit

Sustainability benefits

Lower environmental impact due to efficient production processes

Risk factors

Economic uncertainty and potential delays in implementation

Production objective

32 units annually

Discuss how the investment in new construction technology could help EcoHabitat achieve its production objective of 32 units annually.

Did this page help you?