Exceptions to Mendel's Rules
NOS: Mendel used observations of the natural world to find and explain patterns and trends
- Since Mendel, scientists have looked for discrepancies and asked questions based on further observations to show exceptions to the rules. For example, Morgan discovered non-Mendelian ratios in his experiments with Drosophila
- When looking at dihybrid crosses (crosses with two pairs of observable characteristics), Mendel explained his experimental data with his law of independent assortment
- That individual characteristics are inherited completely independently of each other
- In many cases, this is correct
- The significance of Mendel's work went largely unnoticed for decades, until after his death in 1884
- Scientists in the 1890s and early 1900s picked up his experimental findings and replicated them
- The large number of trials that Mendel undertook highlighted patterns/trends in the inheritance of certain factors (what are now known as genes)
- However, discrepancies were noticed when scientists replicated Mendel's experiments
- And also when experiments were undertaken on the inheritance of certain genes in other organisms
- Many of their dihybrid crosses replicated the 9:3:3:1 pattern of phenotypes that Mendel first observed in his work
- William Bateson and Reginald Punnett, two Cambridge University geneticists (in collaboration with a third Cambridge biologist, Edith Saunders), replicated Mendel's findings, again in experiments with sweet peas, however
- They discovered some apparently anomalous results in certain cases, in which phenotype ratios did not follow the classical 9:3:3:1 pattern
- Many scientists would have dismissed non-conforming results as mere anomalies, however Bateson, Punnett and Saunders chose to search for an explanation
- Punnett's quote from one his laboratory notebooks sums up their approach:
- "Treasure your exceptions! When there are none, the work gets so dull that no one cares to carry it further."
- Bateson and Punnett performed further work, mainly on crossings of sweet peas and crossings of chickens, but were unable to offer a robust explanation for certain unpredictable phenotype ratios in their crosses