The Sign Test (AQA AS Psychology)

Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Written by: Claire Neeson

Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson

When to use the sign test

  • The sign test is a method used in interferential statistics to determine whether or not an observed result (from a statistical test) is significant

  • It is a non-parametric test which means that there is no assumption that the data will follow a normal distribution

  • It is known as the Sign Test as it is based on the number of plus or minus signs present in the data after the calculations have taken place

  • The criteria which determine the use of the Sign Test are

    • If the research investigates a difference

      • An experiment rather than a correlation (which investigates the relationship between variables)

    • Repeated measures design

      • Each participant experiences both conditions of the IV 

    • Nominal data

      • Data in categories (e.g. 'Exercised for 15 minutes/Did no exercise'

    • Whether the hypothesis is directional or non-directional

      • The type of hypothesis used will determine which critical value from the statistical tables to apply to the data

Calculation of the sign test

  • Here is an example of how the Sign Test would be calculated using the results from a (fictional) study

  • A researcher hypothesises that exercising before taking a test would improve concentration

  • These are the results showing the test scores per participant

Participant

Concentration with exercise before test

Concentration with no exercise

Difference

Sign of difference

1

15

9

 

2

7

12

 

3

18

3

 

4

5

5

 

5

11

12

 

6

9

17

 

7

13

8

 

8

6

16

 

9

10

14

 

  • Step 1:

    • Subtract the ‘exercise before test' score from the ‘no exercise' score and add the answer to the ‘difference’ column e.g.

      • 15 – 9 = 6

      • 7 - 12 = -5

  • Step 2:

    • If the score after subtraction is positive, place a + before the number in the ‘difference’ column

    • If the score after subtraction is negative, place a - before the number in the 'difference' column

    • Note that scores of 0 difference do not have a positive or negative sign attached to them

Participant

Concentration with exercise before test

Concentration with no exercise

Difference

Sign of difference

1

15

9

+6

 

2

7

12

-5

 

3

18

3

+15

 

4

5

5

0

 

5

11

12

-1

 

6

9

17

-8

 

7

13

8

+5

 

8

6

16

-10

 

9

10

14

-4

 

  • Step 3:

    • Count the number of + and – signs

      • Number of + signs = 3

      • Number of – signs = 5

    • Whichever number is lower becomes the observed value (S) for the test

      • Observed value of S = 3

Participant

Concentration with exercise before test

Concentration with no exercise

Difference

Sign of difference

1

15

9

+6

 +

2

7

12

-5

 -

3

18

3

+15

 +

4

5

5

0

 

5

11

12

-1

 -

6

9

17

-8

 -

7

13

8

+5

 +

8

6

16

-10

 -

9

10

14

-4

 -

  • Step 4:

    • Identify the critical value using a statistical table

      • Look at the values which relate to whether the test is directional (one-tailed) or non-directional (two-tailed)

      • Select the correct level of significance at p = 0.05

  • Step 5:

    • Use N to find your critical value (N refers to the number of participants in your data set)

      • If you have one participant who has scored the same in both conditions (i.e. difference is 0) you need to remove them from the data (this is true for participant number 4 in the above data set)

      • Therefore N = 8 for the above data set as participant 4 experienced no change

      • Using the N column (on the critical values table) find 8

      • Find the 0.05 critical value (according to whether it was a one-tailed or a two-tailed test)

  • Step 6:

    • Consult your observed value (S) and ask, is the critical value at 0.05  more or less than the S value?

    • In this example let's say a directional (one-tailed) test was used in which case with a value of N = 8, the critical value is 1

    • As S = 3 is more than the critical value of 1, the researcher would have to accept the null hypothesis, there is no difference that exercising before taking a test would improve concentration

    • If the observed value had been equal to or less than the critical value, the researcher would be able to reject the null hypothesis and claim that there was a significant difference that exercising before taking a test would significantly improve concentration

Critical values table for The Sign Test

Level of significance for a one-tailed (directional) test:

 

0.05

0.025

0.01

0.005

Level of significance for a two-tailed (non-directional) test:

 

0.10

0.05

0.025

0.005

N

 

 

 

 

5

0

-

-

-

6

0

0

-

-

7

0

0

0

-

8

1

0

0

0

9

1

1

0

0

10

1

1

0

0

11

2

1

1

0

Accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis

  • If the calculated S value is more than the critical value, the researcher would have to accept the null hypothesis

  • If the calculated S value is equal to or less than the critical value, the researcher would be able to reject the null hypothesis and accept their alternative hypothesis

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.

Lucy Vinson

Author: Lucy Vinson

Expertise: Psychology Subject Lead

Lucy has been a part of Save My Exams since 2024 and is responsible for all things Psychology & Social Science in her role as Subject Lead. Prior to this, Lucy taught for 5 years, including Computing (KS3), Geography (KS3 & GCSE) and Psychology A Level as a Subject Lead for 4 years. She loves teaching research methods and psychopathology. Outside of the classroom, she has provided pastoral support for hundreds of boarding students over a four year period as a boarding house tutor.