Bowlby's Theory of Maternal Deprivation (AQA AS Psychology)

Revision Note

Cara Head

Author

Cara Head

Expertise

Biology Content Creator

Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation

  • Maternal deprivation refers to the separation between a caregiver and a child

  • The consequences of maternal deprivation can be emotional and intellectual

  • The theory of maternal deprivation was proposed by Bowlby (1953) stating that "mother-love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health"

  • It is now understood that there are long-term effects of prolonged separation from a primary caregiver

    • This is primarily due to the absence of emotional care

Bowlby's 44 thieves study

  • As part of his research, Bowlby (1944) conducted the '44 Thieves' study

  • Procedure

    • Bowlby studied 88 children from the Child Guidance Clinic, London, who were emotionally maladjusted

      • Half of the children, 44, were accused of stealing (thieves)

      • The other 44 made up the control group

    • All thieves were interviewed for signs of being affectionless psychopaths

    • Bowlby suggested that this characteristic enabled the children to be thieves

    • Families were also interviewed by Bowlby to establish whether the thieves had had prolonged periods of separation from their caregiver(s)

      • Separations were due to continual or repeated stays in hospital or foster homes with few visits from their family

    • The thieves' data was compared to that of the control group

  • Findings

    • Bowlby categorised 14 of the 44 thieves as affectionless psychopaths, of these 12 (86%) had experienced prolonged periods of separation from their caregivers in the first two years of their lives

    • Five (17%) of the remaining thieves had experienced prolonged separation

    • 40% of the thieves group had experienced early separation from their caregivers

    • Of the control group, only two had experienced prolonged separation

    • Bowlby concluded that prolonged and early separation from caregivers is linked to affectionless psychopathy

Bar chart comparing percentages of affectionless psychopathy and early separation between thieves and controls. Thieves have higher percentages in both categories.
Bowlby's 44 Thieves findings

Separation and deprivation

  • Separation is not the same as deprivation

    • Separation is when the child is not in the presence of their primary attachment figure

    • Deprivation refers to a lack of emotional care (this can happen when a caregiver is present)

  • Separations from caregivers do not have a significant effect on child development as long as during the separation the infant has a substitute caregiver who can offer nurture, comfort and emotional care

    • Physical care: food, warmth and safety are not enough

  • Extended separations can lead to deprivation which can cause emotional and developmental harm

The critical period

  • Bowlby proposed that the first two years of a child's life are a critical period in emotional and psychological development

  • Prolonged or frequent separation from the primary caregiver during this critical period and experiencing deprivation of emotional care may lead to psychological damage

    • For the separation and deprivation to have negative effects, it means that no other substitute caregiver meets the emotional needs of the infant

  • Bowlby suggested that the risk of psychological damage continued until the age of five years old

Consequences on development

  • Bowlby suggested that maternal deprivation would lead to consequences on intellectual and emotional development

  • Intellectual development:

    • Bowlby believed that prolonged separation and deprivation would lead to delays in intellectual development, shown by an extremely low IQ

    • Goldfarb (1974) studied children from orphanages and found that children who were not adopted had lower IQs than those who were either fostered or adopted

  • Emotional development:

    • Bowlby characterised those who had delayed or limited emotional development as affectionless psychopaths

      • Affectionless psychopaths lack emotion or affection toward others and lack remorse for their actions

    • The consequences of emotional development issues are difficulties in developing normal relationships and are associated with criminality

Evaluation

Strengths

  • Bowlby's study changed how people thought about rearing and caring for children

    • The research conducted by Bowlby had a positive impact on how children were treated during separation from their parents, particularly during hospital stays

    • Bowlby's research led to a social change in how children were cared for in hospital

    • This means that there are real-world applications to Bowlby's research as it highlighted the importance of maternal care

  • Studies show support for Bowlby's findings on maternal deprivation

    • Research into women who had experienced separation from their mothers for at least a year found that 25% experienced depression or an anxiety disorder, compared with 15% of a control group (no separation)

    • The results also showed that the intensity of mental health issues was far greater in those who had experienced separation before the age of six years

    • This supports Bowlby's idea of a critical period and the idea that maternal separation has long-lasting consequences

Limitations

  • The evidence for 44 thieves study is flawed

    • Bowlby conducted the interviews with the children and the families himself

    • This could lead to bias in the findings as he may expect certain children to be affectionless psychopaths

    • Today this conclusion would be deemed unethical

    • These factors mean that the study is distorted by investigator effects

  • Bowlby may have confused deprivation with privation

    • Deprivation occurs when an attachment that has already been formed has been broken (the infant is deprived of the attachment or emotional care they once had)

    • Privation is the absence of something desired or needed

    • Rutter (1981) observed that the association of affectionless psychopathy is more likely a result of privation, rather than deprivation

      • The children of the 44 thieves study had disrupted early lives and may never have formed attachments in the first place

      • This suggests that Bowlby may have placed too much cause on the effects of deprivation on children's development

Examiner Tip

Remember there is a difference between evidence being correlational and causational. Although there may be a link between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy, it does not indicate that maternal deprivation causes affectionless psychopathy. Correlation does not equal causation!

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Cara Head

Author: Cara Head

Cara graduated from the University of Exeter in 2005 with a degree in Biological Sciences. She has fifteen years of experience teaching the Sciences at KS3 to KS5, and Psychology at A-Level. Cara has taught in a range of secondary schools across the South West of England before joining the team at SME. Cara is passionate about Biology and creating resources that bring the subject alive and deepen students' understanding