Bowlby's Theory of Maternal Deprivation (AQA AS Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Cara Head
Reviewed by: Lára Marie McIvor
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
Maternal deprivation refers to the separation between a caregiver and a child
The consequences of maternal deprivation can be emotional and intellectual
The theory of maternal deprivation was proposed by Bowlby (1953) stating that "mother-love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health"
It is now understood that there are long-term effects of prolonged separation from a primary caregiver
This is primarily due to the absence of emotional care
Bowlby's 44 thieves study
As part of his research, Bowlby (1944) conducted the '44 Thieves' study
Procedure
Bowlby studied 88 children from the Child Guidance Clinic, London, who were emotionally maladjusted
Half of the children, 44, were accused of stealing (thieves)
The other 44 made up the control group
All thieves were interviewed for signs of being affectionless psychopaths
Bowlby suggested that this characteristic enabled the children to be thieves
Families were also interviewed by Bowlby to establish whether the thieves had had prolonged periods of separation from their caregiver(s)
Separations were due to continual or repeated stays in hospital or foster homes with few visits from their family
The thieves' data was compared to that of the control group
Findings
Bowlby categorised 14 of the 44 thieves as affectionless psychopaths, of these 12 (86%) had experienced prolonged periods of separation from their caregivers in the first two years of their lives
Five (17%) of the remaining thieves had experienced prolonged separation
40% of the thieves group had experienced early separation from their caregivers
Of the control group, only two had experienced prolonged separation
Bowlby concluded that prolonged and early separation from caregivers is linked to affectionless psychopathy
Separation and deprivation
Separation is not the same as deprivation
Separation is when the child is not in the presence of their primary attachment figure
Deprivation refers to a lack of emotional care (this can happen when a caregiver is present)
Separations from caregivers do not have a significant effect on child development as long as during the separation the infant has a substitute caregiver who can offer nurture, comfort and emotional care
Physical care: food, warmth and safety are not enough
Extended separations can lead to deprivation which can cause emotional and developmental harm
The critical period
Bowlby proposed that the first two years of a child's life are a critical period in emotional and psychological development
Prolonged or frequent separation from the primary caregiver during this critical period and experiencing deprivation of emotional care may lead to psychological damage
For the separation and deprivation to have negative effects, it means that no other substitute caregiver meets the emotional needs of the infant
Bowlby suggested that the risk of psychological damage continued until the age of five years old
Consequences on development
Bowlby suggested that maternal deprivation would lead to consequences on intellectual and emotional development
Intellectual development:
Bowlby believed that prolonged separation and deprivation would lead to delays in intellectual development, shown by an extremely low IQ
Goldfarb (1974) studied children from orphanages and found that children who were not adopted had lower IQs than those who were either fostered or adopted
Emotional development:
Bowlby characterised those who had delayed or limited emotional development as affectionless psychopaths
Affectionless psychopaths lack emotion or affection toward others and lack remorse for their actions
The consequences of emotional development issues are difficulties in developing normal relationships and are associated with criminality
Evaluation
Strengths
Bowlby's study changed how people thought about rearing and caring for children
The research conducted by Bowlby had a positive impact on how children were treated during separation from their parents, particularly during hospital stays
Bowlby's research led to a social change in how children were cared for in hospital
This means that there are real-world applications to Bowlby's research as it highlighted the importance of maternal care
Studies show support for Bowlby's findings on maternal deprivation
Research into women who had experienced separation from their mothers for at least a year found that 25% experienced depression or an anxiety disorder, compared with 15% of a control group (no separation)
The results also showed that the intensity of mental health issues was far greater in those who had experienced separation before the age of six years
This supports Bowlby's idea of a critical period and the idea that maternal separation has long-lasting consequences
Limitations
The evidence for 44 thieves study is flawed
Bowlby conducted the interviews with the children and the families himself
This could lead to bias in the findings as he may expect certain children to be affectionless psychopaths
Today this conclusion would be deemed unethical
These factors mean that the study is distorted by investigator effects
Bowlby may have confused deprivation with privation
Deprivation occurs when an attachment that has already been formed has been broken (the infant is deprived of the attachment or emotional care they once had)
Privation is the absence of something desired or needed
Rutter (1981) observed that the association of affectionless psychopathy is more likely a result of privation, rather than deprivation
The children of the 44 thieves study had disrupted early lives and may never have formed attachments in the first place
This suggests that Bowlby may have placed too much cause on the effects of deprivation on children's development
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember there is a difference between evidence being correlational and causational. Although there may be a link between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy, it does not indicate that maternal deprivation causes affectionless psychopathy. Correlation does not equal causation!
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?