Bandura's Research (AQA AS Psychology)

Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Written by: Claire Neeson

Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson

Bandura's research

  • Bandura (1961) set up the following study to investigate social learning theory (SLT) in terms of whether children would imitate an aggressive role model

  • Aims:

    • To investigate the effect of observed aggression on children's behaviour 

    • To investigate the effect of same-sex modelling on children's aggressive behaviour

  • Procedure:

    • 72 participants took part in the study

      • 36 girls

      • 36 boys

      • Aged between 37-69 months 

    • The children were taken from the Stanford University nursery

    • Bandura asked the nursery staff to rate each child's aggression before the experiment

    • Bandura used the nursery staff's aggression ratings to devise a matched pairs experimental design so that each condition of the independent variable would comprise an equal balance of aggressive children e.g.

      • a high-aggression child in one condition would be matched with a high-aggression child in another condition

    • An adult male or female model was observed per condition (the models were not known to the children) with a large inflatable doll named Bobo

    • There were three conditions of the independent variable:

      • Aggressive model – The model behaved aggressively towards the Bobo doll, using pre-determined, standardised behaviours e.g. hitting Bobo with a toy hammer

      • Non‐aggressive model – The model behaved in a non-aggressive way

      • Control group - No model was present

    • There was an equal number of times in which a same-sex model or opposite-sex model was used per condition

    • Each child observed the behaviour of the model for 10 minutes (aggressive or non-aggressive depending on the condition)

    • After this period of observation, each child was taken down a corridor and to another room

    • Each child was told that they could not play with the toys in the new room as they were being saved for other children (the aggression arousal phase, to ensure a baseline across conditions)

    • Each child was then taken to a room containing a Bobo Doll, aggressive toys such as a mallet and a dart gun and non-aggressive toys such as farm toys and crayons

    • The participants were observed  in the Bobo Doll room using a one-way mirror for a duration of 20 minutes

  • Findings:

    • Children who had observed aggressive behaviour were more likely to be aggressive towards the Bobo doll

    • Boys were more physically aggressive

    • Girls were more verbally aggressive

    • Children were more likely to imitate the behaviour of the same-sex role model

  • Conclusion:

    • Aggression can be learned via the mechanisms of SLT

    • Imitation of aggression can occur after only a single exposure to the aggressive act

    • Aggression may be observed in one setting and imitated in a different setting

A person wearing a yellow shirt and gray pants is punching an inflatable clown punching bag (Bobo doll). The clown wears a red hat, blue jacket, and red pants.
Bandura's Bobo doll study

Examiner Tips and Tricks

It is important to note that Bandura's (1961) study does not include any sort of reinforcement in the procedure. Subsequent research by Bandura (1965) introduced vicarious reinforcement: he was interested to see if children would be more likely to imitate a role model that they saw being rewarded for their aggressive behaviours.

Evaluation of Bandura's research

Strengths

  • Bandura used a well-controlled, standardised procedure across several phases

    • This means that the study could be replicated easily

    • Repeated replication of a study means that the results can be checked for consistency across time and using different samples

    • The above observations mean that the study has good reliability

  • The results of Bandura's study fuelled much debate as to children's exposure to the depiction of violence on television

    • This means that his study has good external validity as it can be applied to settings and behaviours beyond the experimental space itself

Limitations

  • Children do not 'learn' aggression in lab conditions; real-life violence is generally observed in familiar settings involving familiar adults

    • This makes Bandura's study less ecologically valid than research conducted in the field would be

  • There are numerous ethical issues with this study

    • Asking nursery workers to rate children's aggression is intrusive and may have encouraged bias

    • Some of the children were exposed to an aggressive adult which may have alarmed and distressed them

    • The aggression arousal phase may have upset the children

    • The children in the aggressive condition may have gone on to use similar aggression outside of the experiment

Worked Example

Here is an example of an A03 question you might be asked on this topic.

AO3: You need to analyse and evaluate key concepts, ideas, theories and research.

Q. Evaluate Bandura's Bobo doll study.

[6 marks]

Model answer:

Outline one limitation:

  • One limitation is that the study was conducted in controlled lab conditions [1 mark]

Explain why this is a limitation:

  • This is a limitation as lab conditions do not reflect how aggression is observed and learned in real social contexts. [1 mark]

Expand further on this limitation:

  • The inability of the study to reflect how aggression is learned in real social contexts means that it lacks ecological validity. [1 mark]

Outline one strength:

  • One strength is that the study used a matched-pairs design. [1 mark]

Explain why this is a strength:

  • This is a strength because a matched pairs design ensures that individual differences do not skew the results e.g. having all of the aggressive children in one condition would not measure the effect of the IV on the DV. [1 mark]

Expand further on this strength:

  • Controlling for individual differences increases the study's internal validity. [1 mark]

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.

Lucy Vinson

Author: Lucy Vinson

Expertise: Psychology Subject Lead

Lucy has been a part of Save My Exams since 2024 and is responsible for all things Psychology & Social Science in her role as Subject Lead. Prior to this, Lucy taught for 5 years, including Computing (KS3), Geography (KS3 & GCSE) and Psychology A Level as a Subject Lead for 4 years. She loves teaching research methods and psychopathology. Outside of the classroom, she has provided pastoral support for hundreds of boarding students over a four year period as a boarding house tutor.