Data Collection Techniques (Cambridge (CIE) AS Environmental Management)
Revision Note
Written by: Alistair Marjot
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Sampling Techniques
Open Frame & Grid Quadrats
Quadrats are square frames made of wood, plastic or wire
They can be in the form of a single open frame or a frame with a grid inside it
They can be a variety of sizes eg. 0.25 m² or 1 m²
They are placed on the ground and the organisms within them are recorded
Non-motile organisms such as plants species are commonly studied using quadrats to measure or estimate their abundance
Quadrats can be used to measure abundance by recording:
The number of organisms: e.g. the total number of plants
The number of an individual species: the total number of individuals of a single species (e.g. daisies) is recorded
Species richness: the total number of different species (but not the number of individuals of each species) is recorded
Percentage cover: the approximate percentage of the quadrat area in which an individual species is found is recorded (this method is often used when it is difficult to count individuals of the plant species being recorded e.g. grass or moss)
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Disadvantages:
Estimates (e.g. of percentage cover) may result in miscalculation and unreliable data
It can be easy to miss individual organisms when counting in a quadrat, especially if they are covered by a different species
Identifying plant species requires training and skill
Point Quadrats
A point quadrat is a vertical frame with holes across the top through which pins are lowered
This is useful in areas with dense plant cover as the ground may be difficult to study using a frame quadrat
Point quadrats can be placed in a habitat randomly, e.g. using random coordinates, or systematically, e.g. along a transect
When a lowered pin touches a species, that species is recorded as being present
If several species are touching the pin then all of those species are recorded
Point quadrats can be used to measure abundance in the following ways:
The number of individuals of a species present: each individual that touches a pin is recorded
Percentage cover of a species: the number of pins touched by a species is divided by the total number of pins used
Most point quadrats have ten pins, so if all the pins are used then a species touching one pin counts as 10 percent cover
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Disadvantages:
If repeat sampling is required, the points are not easy to relocate
Identifying plant species requires training and skill
Pitfall Traps
Pitfall traps are used to sample invertebrate populations that are active on the ground
They are usually made from cans or jars that are buried so that the lip of the container is level with the ground
The container collects ground-dwelling (often nocturnal) insects and other invertebrates as they fall into the trap
Some researchers may add antifreeze liquid (ethylene glycol) to the container to kill and preserve the invertebrates, which prevents sample invertebrates from escaping and also stops predatory insects from eating prey insects
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap to set up
Antifreeze preserves samples so traps can be left for long periods (e.g. a week) to allow for more sample invertebrates to be collected
Disadvantages:
If no chemicals are used to kill the sample invertebrates, predatory insects can eat other samples in the container, or flying insects can escape, which can give unreliable results
Identifying invertebrate species requires training and skill
Can be time-consuming to visit and collect samples from every trap if a large number of sample sites are used
Cannot be used in areas covered in rock or very hard ground (e.g. urban areas)
Sweep Nets
Sweep nets are strong nets (with a fine mesh) attached to a pole
The net is swept vigorously back and forth through vegetation, such as long grass, capturing any invertebrates present there
The net can also be swept just above the vegetation to catch any flying invertebrates that have been disturbed
The net should then be twisted or folded closed to stop sample invertebrates from escaping
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Volunteers can help researchers to collect a large number of samples
Useful for a wide range of insect species
Disadvantages:
This method is not suitable for sampling heavy vegetation, such as trees or thick bushes
Sweeping can cause damage to plants being sampled
Cannot capture ground-dwelling invertebrates
May damage delicate invertebrate specimens
Beating Trays
Beating trays are usually made from a pale-coloured fabric stretched across a square or rectangular frame
As the tree or shrub is shaken or beaten with a stick, invertebrates fall from the foliage and land on the fabric, where they can be easily spotted and collected for identification
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Volunteers can help researchers to collect a large number of samples
Useful for a wide range of insect species
Disadvantages:
Beating or shaking can cause damage to plants being sampled
Not ideal for sampling flying insects as these may fly away when disturbed or once they land on the tray
Kick Sampling
This technique is used to catch freshwater invertebrates living in streams or rivers
A net is placed on the stream-bed so that the water is flowing into it
The stream-bed just upstream of the net is churned up by the researcher (using their foot) for a set period of time
The invertebrates are carried by the stream into the net
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Disadvantages:
Species that are stuck firmly to rocks or the stream-bed will not be sampled
This method is difficult to carry out and not very effective in very shallow or slow-flowing waters
Can be dangerous in deep or fast-flowing waters - researcher must take appropriate safety precautions
Light Traps
Light traps are mainly used for sampling nocturnal flying insects, especially moths
A light source (e.g. a fluorescent or UV lamp) attracts insects, which are then collected in a trap
Advantages:
Relatively low effort as the insects are attracted to the trap so the researcher just needs to wait
Can be adapted to be used in marine environments e.g. for sampling plankton
Disadvantages:
Success rates can greatly vary depending on night-time temperatures and humidity levels
Some species may actually be repelled by light at short range, so are not successfully sampled
Capture-Mark-Recapture
The capture-mark-recapture technique is used to estimate population size in situations where capturing every individual is impractical
Live trapping is carried out, where sample organisms are harmlessly captured, marked, and then released
The total number of samples is recorded
Information about the samples can be recorded before release, including gender, weight, length, colouration, species, and details of the method used to mark the organisms
After a set period of time (to allow the marked organisms to naturally disperse back into their surroundings), the same area is resampled
The total number of samples is recorded, including the totals for marked organisms (which are easily identifiable) and organisms captured for the first time (unmarked organisms)
Advantages:
Harm to captured organisms is minimised
Can be used to estimate total population size
Disadvantages:
Potential decrease in an individual's survival chances due to trapping or marking
Marks might become less visible over time, making marked individuals more difficult to identify during second round of trapping (i.e. during the resampling)
Learned behaviour or increased wariness might reduce the likelihood of recapture for individuals that have already been trapped once
Regular checks of traps are essential to ensure the well-being of captured organisms
Water Turbidity & Secchi Discs
Turbidity is how cloudy or murky water is due to sediments suspended in the water
High levels of sediment (i.e. high turbidity) can negatively affect aquatic organisms
For example, suspended sediments can:
Contain high levels of pollutants
Block light that aquatic plants depend on for photosynthesis
Smother the gills or breathing apparatus of aquatic invertebrates and fish
A Secchi disc (usually 20 cm in diameter) is a simple method for measuring turbidity
Low Secchi depth values indicate low visibility and therefore high turbidity
High Secchi depth values indicate high visibility and therefore low turbidity
Advantages:
Easy, quick and cheap
Easy and quick to visually compare turbidity of different sites, or at the same site at different times
Disadvantages:
This method is susceptible to researcher bias - some people may have better eyesight than others and therefore be able see the disc at greater depths
Questionnaires
A questionnaire is a research method in which participants respond to a set of predefined questions
Sometimes known as surveys, questionnaires can be used to collect information about people’s opinions on a variety of topics or issues, such as environmental issues
If respondents are given a range of tickable boxes from which to choose their answer (e.g. strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree), quantitative data can be collected and analysed
Questions that require a longer answer, unique to the respondent, can be used to collect qualitative data
Advantages:
Relatively cheap to carry out
Can gather a large amount of data relatively quickly (allows for large sample sizes)
Data is comparable and relatively easy to analyse
Disadvantages:
Requires participants to be honest and accurate, and to answer all questions
Data is limited to the questions and responses included in the questionnaire
Interviews
An interview is a research method in which data is collected via a direct, in-depth conversation with a participant (in person, over the phone or by video call)
Interviews are most often held on a one-to-one basis
Advantages:
Interviews allow detailed qualitative data to be collected
Topics or issues can be discussed and explored further than via a questionnaire
Interviewers can keep discussion focused and on-track
Disadvantages:
An interviewer is required to hold the interview, which can be time-consuming and expensive
The greater time required also means sample sizes are limited compared to questionnaires
Can be susceptible to interviewer bias (due to the ability, attitude or opinions of the interviewer)
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?