Structure & Bonding of the Period 3 Elements (Cambridge (CIE) AS Chemistry)
Revision Note
Explaining Physical Properties of the Period 3 Elements
Melting point
Melting points of the elements across Period 3 table
Period 3 element | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | Cl | Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Melting point (K) | 371 | 923 | 932 | 1638 | 317 | 392 | 172 | 84 |
Graph of melting points across Period 3
There is a general increase in melting point from Na to Si, followed by a sharp drop to the lower melting points of P to Ar
The above trends can be explained by looking at the bonding and structure of the elements
Bonding and structure of the Period 3 elements table
Period 3 element | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | Cl | Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bonding | Metallic | Metallic | Metallic | Covalent | Covalent | Covalent | Covalent | - |
Structure | Giant metallic | Giant metallic | Giant metallic | Giant molecular | Simple molecular | Simple molecular | Simple molecular | Simple molecular |
The table shows that Na, Mg and Al are metallic elements which form positive ions arranged in a giant lattice in which the ions are held together by a 'sea' of delocalised electrons around them
The structure of metals
Metal cations form a giant lattice held together by electrons that can freely move around
The electrons in the ‘sea’ of delocalised electrons are those from the valence shell of the atoms
Na will donate one electron into the ‘sea’ of delocalised electrons, Mg will donate two and Al three electrons
As a result of this, the metallic bonding in Al is stronger than in Na
This is because the electrostatic forces between a 3+ ion and the larger number of negatively charged delocalised electrons is much larger compared to a 1+ ion and the smaller number of delocalised electrons in Na
Due to this, the melting points increase going from Na to Al
Si has the highest melting point due to its giant molecular structure in which each Si atom is held to its neighbouring Si atoms by strong covalent bonds
P, S, Cl and Ar are non-metallic elements and exist as simple molecules (P4, S8, Cl2 and Ar as a single atom)
The covalent bonds within the molecules are strong, however, between the molecules, there are only weak instantaneous dipole-induced dipole forces
It doesn’t take much energy to break these intermolecular forces
Therefore, the melting points decrease going from P to Ar (note that the melting point of S is higher than that of P as sulphur exists as larger S8 molecules compared to the smaller P4 molecule)
Electrical conductivity
The electrical conductivity decreases going across the Period 3 elements
Trends in electrical conductivity across Period 3 table
Period 3 element | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | Cl | Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrical conductivity (S m-1) | 0.218 | 0.224 | 0.382 | 2 x 10-10 | 10-17 | 10-23 | - | - |
Going from Na to Al, there is an increase in the number of valence electrons that are donated to the ‘sea’ of delocalised electrons
Because of this, in Al there are more electrons available to move around through the structure when it conducts electricity, making Al a better electrical conductor than Na
Due to the giant molecular structure of Si, there are no delocalised electrons that can freely move around within the structure
Si is therefore not a good electrical conductor and is classified as a semimetal (metalloid)
The lack of delocalised electrons is also why P and S cannot conduct electricity
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Intermolecular forces are forces between molecules
Intramolecular forces are forces within a molecule
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?