Global Arms Race (College Board AP® US History)

Study Guide

Kristin Marciniak

Written by: Kristin Marciniak

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

U.S. Military−Industrial Complex

  • As the Cold War continued, military leaders, politicians, and civilians debated the merits of stockpiling nuclear and other deadly weapons

Pros of nuclear weapons

  • Having the most dangerous (deadly) weapons acted as a deterrent to Soviet aggression

  • The U.S. could reduce its standing military (and the associated expenses) if it had the weaponry for a massive, long-distance retaliation

Cons of nuclear weapons

  • Having the most dangerous and deadly weapons encouraged the Soviet Union to create weapons that caused even more damage 

    • This would cause the U.S. would have to increase their weapons capabilities, fueling an arms race

  • Creating and maintaining a deep artillery is hugely expensive

  • Even if the U.S. attacked first, there is the risk of mutual assured destruction

  • At the end of his presidency, Dwight Eisenhower warned Americans about the dangerous influence of the military‒industrial complex

    • He was referring to the big business of manufacturing weapons in the United States

    • He worried that government and military officials would start making policy recommendations and decisions based on business relationships, not on what was best for the country and the larger world

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Learning about history isn't just memorizing dates, places, and people. It's also about understanding the risks and rewards facing the leaders of the past as well as analyzing the consequences of the decisions they ultimately made. You may be asked to do this on the AP US History exam in the form of a persuasive essay. 

For example, imagine that you are asked to write a persuasive essay about the effectiveness of mutual assured destruction. You want to convince your reader that mutual assured destruction is the best way to prevent nations from harming one another. One way to do that is through comparison. Describe a time when two nations were at war and mutual assured destruction wasn't a possibility, such as at the end of the World War II. Only the United States had the atomic bomb. The result was the US's double attack on Japan, which killed millions of Japanese civilians. Then describe how mutual assured destruction works and why its outcome of a standoff or Cold War is better.

You've read 0 of your 5 free study guides this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Kristin Marciniak

Author: Kristin Marciniak

Expertise: History Content Creator

Kristin is a freelance writer and editor with 15 years of experience in educational publishing, specializing in grades 2–12 English Language Arts and Social Studies. She has authored 21 school library books, including LGBTQ Discrimination in America and The Revolutionary War: Why They Fought, and created over 40 study guides for literature and historical documents. Kristin also writes and edits textbooks, teacher’s editions, and test questions. A graduate of the University of Missouri-Columbia with a degree in journalism, she enjoys teaching creative writing and hosting book clubs for tweens and teens.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.