Different European Reactions towards Indigenous Peoples (College Board AP® US History)
Study Guide
Summary
Timeline
1598: Catholic missionaries in what is now New Mexico force the Pueblo to convert to Christianity
1675: Spanish authorities arrest and jail Tewa Pueblo leader Po'Pay on charges of performing witchcraft and killing missionaries
1675: The massacre known as the Great Swamp Fight occurs in West Kingston, Rhode Island
1675-1676 Metacom's (King Philip's) War is fought in New England
1680: Po'Pay leads successful revolt against the Spanish which drives them out of Pueblo lands
1692: Spanish return to New Mexico and regain control of the area
Early 1700s: French fur trade exists throughout the Great Lakes region, the St. Lawrence River Valley, and the Mississippi River Valleys
European reactions toward Indigenous peoples varied significantly, shaped by their differing goals, approaches to settlement, and religious views. In the Southwest, Catholic missionaries, such as those in New Mexico, sought to convert Indigenous peoples like the Pueblo, often using forceful methods. The French established a fur trade by the early 1700s, relying on more cooperative relations with Indigenous tribes in regions like the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River, and Mississippi River valleys. These varying relationships reflect how European powers shaped and were shaped by their interactions with Native peoples across different regions.
European treatment of Indigenous peoples
By the early 1700s, the French had established a highly successful fur trade throughout:
the Great Lakes region
the St. Lawrence River Valley
the Mississippi River Valleys
The fur trade was a major source of wealth for France
Members of Indigenous tribes participated in the fur trade with the French
France needed this relationship to maintain the fur trade and continue its success
The French did not force Indigenous peoples to convert to Catholicism
Some Indigenous women married French men
Many Indigenous peoples:
settled in French mission villages
attended Mass
wore crucifixes
Other Indigenous people chose to
practice their traditional religions
follow a mixture of traditional and Catholic beliefs
Negative influences and changing views on enslavement
Interactions between the French and Indigenous peoples were not all positive
The French brought negative influences into Indigenous communities, including:,
contagious diseases that decimated Indigenous populations
guns which increased the violence between tribes
alcohol which disrupted Indigenous social structures and health
Over time, Indigenous views on enslavement changed due to these interactions
Indigenous people increased the number of raids on neighboring tribes, capturing people to be used as enslaved labor for the fur trade
This shift was partly due to the increased demand for furs, which required more labor and resources
Traditional practices of integrating captives into communities or using them as gifts to form alliances began to fade
Indigenous groups started to view captives more as economic assets for the fur trade
Aligning their practices with European models of enslavement
Pueblo Revolt
The Spanish wanted to spread Christianity
They forced Indigenous peoples to convert to this religion
In 1598, Catholic missionaries burned Pueblo kivas, masks, and other sacred objects used in religious ceremonies
As part of this, they destroyed colorful mural paintings
Spain arrested and jailed a Tewa Pueblo leader named Po'Pay in 1675
He was charged on suspicion of witchcraft and killing several missionaries
The Pueblo Revolt was an uprising in 1680, in what is now New Mexico
The uprising was led by the Pueblo people and drove the Spanish out of the region for 12 years
The Pueblo were tried in Spanish courts and received severe punishments including:
hanging
whipping
enslavement
cut off hands or feet
After his release from prison, Po’Pay went into hiding and spent four years planning a revolt
He believed the loss of traditions, languages, and religion meant the entire Pueblo culture was under attack
Po’Pay used knotted ropes to send messages about the date of the revolt
Local leaders untied a knot each day until all the knots were gone
Spanish authorities captured and killed two messengers
After this, the date had to be changed
Po'Pay led the revolt on August 10, 1680
Almost all Pueblos participated; some died
The Spanish fled the area on August 21, 1680
Over 400 Spanish died, including several dozen priests
After the successful uprising, the Pueblo
washed off their Christian baptisms
annulled Christian marriages
set fire to Christian churches
kept the Spanish out of the region for 12 years
The Pueblo Revolt is the only successful North American uprising against a colonial power
Some Pueblo scholars say 12 years was enough time to preserve ancient Pueblo lands, languages and traditions that still exist today
Metacom's (King Philip's) War
In the 1670s, the relationship between English colonists and the Wampanoag got worse
There were land disputes about the English colony’s livestock grazing on Wampanoag fishing and hunting grounds
The English continued their influence on the Wampanoag, including
expanding their agricultural activities, using the Wampanoag lands for livestock grazing which reduced the resources for hunting and fishing
controlling regional trade, often benefitting their own economic interests at the expense of the Wamponoag who were given little in return for their food and furs
religious conversion to Christianity
The Wampanoag and colonial militias led raiding parties against each other
The Narragansett of Rhode Island pledged to stay neutral in the conflict
To keep them safe from the raids, Wampanoag leader Metacom (also known by the English name King Philip) sent women, older men, and children to live with the Narragansett
Colonists felt that due to this, the Narragansett were no longer neutral
They considered the Wampanoag men, women, and children to be hostages
They demanded the Narragansett give the Wampanoag to the colonial militias
The Narragansett did not hand over the Wampanoag
They executed three Wampanoag who had killed one of Metacom’s former advisors
Metacom had accused the advisor of being a colonial spy
In November 1675, a militia of colonial men and Indigenous allies went to what is now West Kingston, Rhode Island
They attacked a Narragansett fort located on an island in a swamp and set the fort on fire
This caused the deaths of as many as 600 Narragansett older people, women and children
The Incident became known as a massacre called the Great Swamp Fight
In Spring 1676, after the Great Swamp Fight, the Narragansett became allies with Metacom and the Wampanoag they:
formed an army of 3,500 men from several Indigenous groups
moved through southern Rhode Island and central Massachusetts
destroyed English settlements or forced settlers to leave them
burned Providence after meeting with Roger Williams
no longer trusted the English because the English had attacked them first
In August 1676, the colonial forces killed Metacom
The conflict ended in September
During the war, colonists and their Indigenous allies had killed Indigenous peoples that opposed English settlement
Colonists sold survivors into enslavement or forced them to become indentured servants
Worked Example
(A) Briefly contrast ONE element of the French interaction with Indigenous peoples in the early 1700s and ONE element of the Spanish interaction with the Pueblo before 1680.
Answer: The French did not force Indigenous peoples to convert to Christianity. Some Indigenous peoples chose to follow a mixture of traditional and Catholic beliefs. The Pueblo had no choice about converting to Christianity because the Spanish burned Pueblo kivas, masks, and other sacred objects.
(B) Briefly describe ONE aspect of French interactions that had negative consequences for Indigenous peoples and ONE aspect of Spanish interactions that had negative consequences for Indigenous peoples.
Answer: French interactions brought alcohol and guns into Indigenous communities. Spanish interactions brought more direct harm to Indigenous peoples. The Spanish punished the Pueblo by hanging them, whipping them, enslaving them, or cutting off their hands or feet.
(C) Briefly explain ONE difference between the outcome of the Pueblo Revolt and the outcome of Metacom's (King Philip's) War.
Answer: The Pueblo Revolt pushed the Spanish out of Pueblo lands for 12 years and preserved ancient Pueblo lands, languages and traditions. At the end of Metacom's (King Philip's) War, Indigenous peoples that opposed English settlement were dead and survivors sold into enslavement or forced to become indentured servants.
You've read 0 of your 5 free study guides this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?