Ethical Implications of Research (AQA A Level Psychology) : Revision Note
Ethical implications of research studies & theory
Researchers must be mindful of the impact their research has on the participants involved in the research at the time of the research taking place, and when the research is published i.e. some time afterwards
Researchers face some dilemmas when conducting research e.g.
how much do they tell their participants (to satisfy the ethical guideline of informed consent) and how much do they conceal to ensure their findings are valid?
to what extent can participants be put under stressful conditions without it becoming physically or psychologically harmful?
The British Psychological Society (BPS) (and American Psychological Society) exist to oversee psychological research and to ensure that both participants and researchers are protected by ethical guidelines
Once research has been published there is very little that can be done by researchers in terms of how the media will interpret and present the findings of that research e.g.
a research study may find that people born with a specific gene lack the ability to control their anger
This in turn may be reported by the media as 'X gene means you're a psychopath!'
a theory may be suggested which claims that schizophrenia can follow after PTSD
This theory may then lead to war veterans, survivors of abuse and others with PTSD being discriminated against - their symptoms of PTSD may be viewed as 'evidence' of schizophrenia developing
Researchers must then, be mindful of the impact of their published findings and be careful when it comes to how their findings might be interpreted
Ethical implications & social sensitivity
Socially sensitive research deals with topics that, if handled badly by the researcher, could have negative consequences for the groups involved due to how the findings could be interpreted or even manipulated by external sources such as the media e.g.
research into drug addiction in a population of homeless people
research into the stereotyping of women aged 18-25
research into the experience of refugees who have entered a country illegally
Research into 'hot topics' such as criminality, addiction, sexual preference, gender and race tend to be particularly prone to media scrutiny (both mass media such as TV news and social media platforms)
When conducting socially sensitive research, researchers must exercise reflexivity
This involves the researcher examining their assumptions, beliefs, and prejudices about the topic they are investigating
Researchers must consider carefully how these could influence them and be critical about the choices they make before, during and after the research process
Evaluation of socially sensitive research
Strengths
Minority or underrepresented social groups can be given the ‘spotlight’
A higher profile allows perspectives, attitudes and experiences that are not those of the dominant group to be heard
This is a strength as it widens the social and cultural landscape and highlights the richness of human experience on a broader scale
Socially sensitive research can help to highlight inadequacies in the care of vulnerable people e.g.
Rosenhan’s (1973) study on the de-humanising treatment of patients in mental hospitals in the USA led to a review of how such institutions were run and their potential for labelling people according to their illness
Limitations
Some socially sensitive studies have been conducted in ways which are far from ethical and have in turn led to the perpetuation of bias and discrimination e.g.
Burt (1955) invented data that led to the implementation of the 11+ examinations in the UK
The results of this exam segregated children according to their IQ which could act as a self-fulfilling prophecy
Researchers who conduct socially sensitive research must take care not to exploit their participants, particularly if those participants are vulnerable e.g.
Griffiths (1994) study into gambling addiction used regular gamblers who were asked to play on slot machines which could reinforce their need to gamble
This is a limitation as it pushes the boundaries of what is ethical in research
Implications for the research process
Socially sensitive research can be difficult for researchers to negotiate and manage but this does not mean that it should be avoided
Many socially sensitive research topics may bring with them hugely beneficial consequences e.g.
challenging stereotypes, preconceived ideas and prejudice
refuting ‘scientific justifications’ which have been determined based on discrimination
e.g. Murray & Herrnstein's (1994) book 'The Bell Curve' which pushed what was thought to be a racist agenda under the guise of research into IQ
Socially sensitive research can encourage the public to develop a greater understanding of minority groups
Socially sensitive research has in the past been used as ‘scientific justification’ for discriminatory practices e.g.
the USA in the 1920s and 30s offered voluntary sterilisation programmes to those who were labelled as ‘unfit to breed’
These groups included disabled people, those with mental illness and drug addicts
The programme was based on fraudulent research and fake findings
Thus, socially sensitive research can and has been used for malicious and unscrupulous motives
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You must be very clear in an exam response as to what is meant by ‘ethical implications’. You will lose marks if you simply recount a list of ethical guidelines with no link to implications.
You will gain marks if you give examples that explicitly link ethics to implications, e.g. that participants would be harmed if the published research served to demonise them. A good answer to a high-value question (12 or 16 marks) on ethical implications tends to cover a range of issues and make effective use of such diverse topics as IQ testing, defining abnormality, attitudes to child-rearing, gender research, although any topics can be cited as long as they are relevant.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?