Reporting Psychological Investigations: Sections of a Scientific Report (AQA A Level Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Claire Neeson
Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson
Abstract & introduction
A scientific report presents the findings of a piece of research which has been designed, conducted and analysed by one or more researchers
Scientific reports follow a specific structure and use a standardised format
A scientific report consists of the following sections which are always presented in this order:
Abstract
The abstract is a summary of the entire research process which should be 150 - 200 words long (according to the APA guidelines)
Abstracts include a brief overview of the study's aim, hypotheses, method, results and conclusion
Reading an abstract can help to inform the reader as to whether or not the report is going to be useful for their purposes
Introduction
The introduction to the report details what the study is to cover e.g.
the theory or theories which are relevant to the study
associated research that is relevant to the study (e.g. if the study investigates short-term memory the introduction will include references to other studies on the same topic)
The introduction concludes by stating what the aim of the study is, followed by the experimental hypothesis and the null hypothesis
Method & findings
Method
The sample is described and justified e.g.
the total number of participants in the sample (and how many of those were female; how many were male)
the age of the participants
the nationality(s) of the participants
other relevant demographic details e.g. profession, ethnicity, skills etc.
The sampling method is described e.g.
an opportunity sample of university students
a random sample of cardiac patients who attend out-patients clinics in one large city
The design is described and justified e.g.
repeated measures if the study is a lab experiment
covert naturalistic participant observation if the study is an observation
The materials are described and their use explained e.g.
video of a staged car crash lasting 7 seconds to accompany a set of questions relevant to eyewitness testimony
The procedure is described which should include:
the standardised instructions used to explain the task to participants
how the participants completed the task
how the participant's performance on the task was recorded/measured
briefing instructions
debriefing details
information as to how ethical guidelines were followed and implemented e.g.
the participants gave informed consent via a consent form
the consent form included the participants' right to withdraw
Findings
The findings summarise the results of the study
These are measured as:
the performance of the participants on the task set up by the researcher (experiments)
their behaviour in a given context (observations)
their responses to questions (self-report methods)
If the research has collected quantitative data this is analysed statistically via (usually) both descriptive and inferential statistics
Descriptive statistics include the use of either mean, median or mode (measures of central tendency) and either range or standard deviation (measures of dispersion)
Inferential statistics are used to test the level of significance, known as probability testing (the use of a parametric or non-parametric test) which results in the null hypothesis being accepted or rejected, depending on the outcome of the test
If the research has collected qualitative data this is analysed using appropriate methods such as thematic analysis or content analysis
The written transcript of the research is categorised into coding units (content analysis) or themes (thematic analysis)
Discussion & referencing
Discussion
The discussion starts with a consideration of the findings which are analysed in light of the aim of the research and the theory being investigated
The discussion presents an evaluation of the research itself, identifying strengths and limitations of each aspect of it e.g.
a strength of the study might be that it used a double-blind procedure, ensuring validity
a limitation of the sample might be that it was gender-biased, being predominantly female
The discussion concludes by considering the research in the light of wider contexts, the implications of the research and what its potential applications are e.g.
in health settings
in education
as a useful contribution to the understanding of the theory
Referencing
To avoid accusations of plagiarism the researcher must acknowledge all sources used throughout the research process
Referencing must adhere to a particular convention and be consistent throughout the report, with a different format used depending on whether a journal article or book is referenced
To reference a journal article the following format is usual:
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of experimental psychology, 58(3), 193.
To reference a book the following format is usual:
Goldacre, B. (2013). Bad Pharma: How medicine is broken and how we can fix it. London: Fourth Estate
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Don't overlook or disregard the importance of this topic. Students have, in the past, been asked to write out a reference using the correct format or to identify specific sections of a psychology report.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?