Hemispheric Lateralisation (AQA A Level Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Claire Neeson
Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson
Hemispheric lateralisation
The brain is split into two hemispheres:
the right hemisphere
the left hemisphere
The two hemispheres are connected by the corpus callosum, which acts as a bridge between the two hemispheres and allows them to send messages and work together
The brain is contralateral
The left side of the body is controlled by the right side of the brain and vice versa
A stroke in the left hemisphere will be physically evident on the right side of the body e.g. the right side of the mouth will droop or there may be weakness in the limbs on the right side of the body
Hemispheric lateralisation refers to the division of functions between the two hemispheres
The left hemisphere
The left hemisphere is generally lateralised (in most people) to the processing of language e.g.
Broca's area (speech production) and Wernicke's area (language comprehension) are found in the left hemisphere
A stroke in the left hemisphere is likely to result in impaired speech
The right hemisphere
The right hemisphere is generally lateralised (in most people) to the processing of visual information, imagination and creativity
Spatial information is lateralised to the right hemisphere e.g.
one case study of a woman with right hemisphere damage found that she would often get lost even in familiar locations if she wasn't given verbal instructions
Broca's & Wernicke's areas
Broca's area
Paul Broca (1824- 1880) was a surgeon and neurologist who was particularly interested in speech disorders
One of Broca's patients was a man named Louis Leborgne, who had suffered from epilepsy throughout childhood
Leborgne was hospitalised at the age of 30 and stayed in hospital until he died in 1861 at the age of 51
He was transferred to Broca's care toward the end of his life
Leborgne became known by the nickname 'Tan'
This was because his neurological condition meant that he could only produce one spoken word: “Tan”
Tan suffered from complete paralysis down the right side of his body but he was able to move his left arm and leg with ease
After Tan died in 1861, Broca performed a brain autopsy
Broca found a lesion on the left temporal lobe of Tan's brain
This was the only damage to the brain; all other areas were intact
As the left temporal lobe was the only visible area of damage to Tan's brain, Broca concluded that this was the area that is responsible for speech production
The term Broca's aphasia is now used as a diagnosis for people who have difficulty producing speech
Wernicke's Area
Around 10 years after the discovery of Broca's area, Carl Wernicke identified a similar language-related problem in which patients were able to speak but were not able to comprehend language
Wernicke examined the brains of patients who exhibited this specific problem
His analysis of their brains revealed that damage to the temporal lobe in the left hemisphere resulted in patients producing speech that was fluent but devoid of meaning
The damage in the temporal lobe was close to the auditory area
The term Wernicke's aphasia is now used as a diagnosis for people who have difficulty understanding language and accessing the correct words
Split-brain research: Sperry
The corpus callosum connects the left and right hemispheres
This connection allows for rapid communication between the two hemispheres
A type of epilepsy called tonic close seizures can be treated by severing the corpus callosum in a procedure called a corpus callosotomy
The surgery aims to stop erratic electric messages bouncing between hemispheres, reducing the number of seizures
Patients report very few side effects from the treatment, however, some have reported that they feel like they are two people inside one body
Sperry's Split Brain Research
Sperry (1968) studied 11 patients who had a corpus callosotomy as a treatment for their epileptic seizures
Sperry's procedure was based on the brain being contralateral
Information from the left visual field goes to the right hemisphere and information from the right visual field goes to the left hemisphere
Sperry projected information into each visual field, controlling which information each visual field accessed
Each participant was placed in front of a screen and had one of their eyes covered by an eye patch
This was done to operationalise the use of either the left or the right visual field
A tachistoscope was used to present visual stimuli
Sperry then sent information to the uncovered eye for a split second as follows:
Describe what you see
When an image was shown to the participant’s right visual field they could easily describe what was seen (the information had gone to their left hemisphere)
When a picture was presented to their left visual field they could not describe it in words, in fact, they often reported that there was nothing there (the information had gone to their right hemisphere)
Recognise by touch
The participants’ hands were covered and they could not see the objects that were then presented to them
Sperry placed a series of objects in the participants’ hands (objects placed in the right hand are processed in the left hemisphere and vice-versa)
When an object was placed in the right hand the participant could describe it using speech or writing
When an object was placed in the left hand the participant made wild guesses as to what it was and often seemed unaware that they were holding anything, but they could select a matching object from a ‘grab bag’ using their left hand
Composite words
When two words were presented simultaneously (e.g. key and ring, one word to each visual field), the participant would write the word ‘key’ with their left hand (left-hand goes to right hemisphere linked to the left visual field) and say the word ‘ring’ (right visual field links to left hemisphere)
Drawing tasks
When participants were asked to draw a picture presented to the right visual field (left hemisphere), the right hand performed worse than the left hand (right hemisphere)
When participants were asked to draw a picture presented to the left visual field (right hemisphere), the drawings from the left hand were much better than from the right hand (all the participants were right-handed)
Evaluation of hemispheric lateralisation
Strengths
This is a well-controlled experiment which involved a range of tasks designed to test hemispheric lateralisation
The standardised procedures of each task mean that the research is replicable
A replicable procedure can be tested for consistency
This means that Sperry's research is high in reliability
Sperry won the Nobel prize for this research as it provided huge insight into the workings of the brain
The findings led many researchers to conclude that severing the corpus callosum causes each hemisphere to acquire its own consciousness
This is a strength because it has contributed significantly to understanding the complex and detailed interplay between brain function, cognition and behaviour
Limitations
Some researchers argue that even in split-brain patients the brain can only produce one consciousness
They suggest that the two hemispheres are not separately conscious after surgery
Visual perception remains separate, but consciousness is shared across the brain
This means that more research should be conducted with split-brain patients to determine what is and is not separate per hemisphere
The issue with trying to replicate Sperry's research and conduct more studies in this field is that Sperry was working with a small, highly specific sample
People who have had a corpus callosotomy represent a restricted population
This means that Sperry's findings are difficult to generalise beyond this very limited demographic
Worked Example
Here is an example of an AO3 question you might be asked on this topic.
AO3: You need to analyse and evaluate key concepts, ideas, theories and research.
Q. Evaluate split-brain research.
[4 marks]
Model answer:
Identify a strength with an explanation:
Research conducted in the field of split-brain patients is scientific e.g. Sperry's (1968) use of standardised procedures in controlled conditions successfully demonstrates the differences in function per hemisphere; [1 mark]
Identify a limitation with an explanation:
However, the quasi nature of his experiment (the IV was naturally-occurring) means that Sperry could not exert 100% control as his sample comprised the IV, plus the sample itself is small (11 participants) which limits the reliability of the data; [1 mark]
Identify another strength with an explanation:
The findings from split-brain research have been extremely useful in understanding how the brain is organised which in turn can inform post-surgery/injury therapy for people with brain damage e.g. the finding that the language centre of the brain is in the left hemisphere; [1 mark]
Identify another limitation with an explanation:
Some research however (e.g. Gazzaniga, 1998) casts doubt as the idea that a split brain operates independently and has two consciousnesses: plasticity and functional recovery allow the brain to compensate for loss in one hemisphere and to unify the brain into one, intact consciousness; [1 mark]
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?