Reflecting vs Refracting Telescopes (AQA A Level Physics)
Revision Note
Comparing Refractors & Reflectors
The two main types of aberration that affect the quality of images produced by refractors and reflectors are:
Chromatic aberration
Spherical aberration
Chromatic Aberration
Chromatic aberration is a type of image distortion seen only in refracting telescopes, where:
Different wavelengths of light are refracted by different amounts causing the edges of an image to appear coloured
This is due to the fact blue light has a shorter wavelength than red light, meaning blue light is refracted more by a lens than red light
This is because blue light has a bigger refractive index
Consequently, different colours are brought to focus at different points
For example, blue light focuses closer to the lens than red light, because of this greater refraction
The result is the image has a multi-coloured blurred edges
Chromatic Aberration of a Lens
This diagram of the Moon shows a very extreme example of chromatic aberration, it is usually more subtle than this
Chromatic aberration cannot be eliminated entirely, but it can be significantly reduced by using a second diverging lens which refracts the light in the opposite direction
This allows the red light to be brought to the same focal point as the blue light
Correcting Chromatic Aberration
Chromatic aberration does not happen in reflecting telescopes, because mirrors can only reflect, not refract
Spherical Aberration
Spherical aberration is a type of image distortion which can affect both refractors and reflectors, where:
Rays of light come to focus at different points due to the spherical curvature of a lens, or mirror, causing the image to become very blurred
The positions of the focal points depend on where the rays of light meet the lens or the mirror
The further the ray is from the principal axis, the shorter its focal length
Ray Diagrams for Spherical Aberration
Spherical aberration can affect both lens and mirrors
In a refracting telescope, spherical aberration cannot be eliminated entirely, but it can be reduced by using a parabolic lens
However, there is a limit to how much this improves the image quality, as this further increases the size and weight of the lens
Whereas, in a reflecting telescope, spherical aberration can be entirely overcome by using a parabolic mirror
Parabolic mirror
Spherical aberration is eliminated by using a parabolic mirror
Refracting Telescopes
Advantages
Refractors require less maintenance than reflectors
Refractors are not as sensitive to temperature changes as reflectors
Disadvantages
Refractors are not usually the telescope of choice due to their:
1. Size
It is difficult to make large-diameter glass lenses which are completely free from defects
Large magnifications require large objective lenses and very long focal lengths
2. Weight
Large-diameter lenses are heavy and tend to distort under their own weight
Refractors are heavy and difficult to manoeuvre so they have a slower response to astronomical events
Observing equipment and electronics must be mounted to the telescope which adds to the weight
3. Construction
Lenses can only be mounted and supported around their edges however, this is where they are thinnest and weakest
4. Image quality
Refractors suffer from both chromatic and spherical aberration
5. Ability to observe non-visible wavelengths
Refractors are only able to observe wavelengths of visible light
Reflecting Telescopes
Advantages
Reflectors are superior in their design because of their:
1. Size
The diameter of a mirror can be much larger than that of a lens so greater magnifications can be achieved
The arrangement of the mirrors allows reflectors to be much shorter than refractors
Several small mirrors can be used to form a large composite objective mirror
2. Weight
Large single mirrors can be made, which are light and easily supportable from behind
Reflectors are lighter which allows for a more rapid response to astronomical events
3. Construction
Mirrors only use the front surface for reflection, which eliminates many of the problems associated with lenses
Mirror surfaces can be made very thin (a few nm) which allows for greater image detail
4. Image quality
Mirrors cannot produce chromatic aberration
Reflectors do not suffer from spherical aberration use if parabolic mirrors are used
5. Ability to observe non-visible wavelengths
Reflectors can be designed to observe wavelengths of light outside of the visible spectrum
Reflectors can be sent into space which eliminates light absorption due to the atmosphere
Disadvantages
The secondary mirror has the disadvantage of blocking some light from entering the primary mirror
The secondary mirror and its supports will cause some diffraction which can affect the clarity of the image
Mirrors in a reflecting telescope are exposed to air so they require regular maintenance
Light is refracted in the eyepiece lens and therefore some chromatic aberration may be introduced at this stage
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Make sure you understand that the secondary mirror on the reflector has an effect on the clarity of the image by slightly reducing the amount of light reaching the aperture.
When comparing the two types of telescope, make sure to focus on optical differences only, factors such as cost will not gain any credit in an exam
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?