Comparing Refractors & Reflectors
- The two main types of aberration that affect the quality of images produced by refractors and reflectors are:
- Chromatic aberration
- Spherical aberration
Chromatic Aberration
- Chromatic aberration is a type of image distortion seen only in refracting telescopes, where:
Different wavelengths of light are refracted by different amounts causing the edges of an image to appear coloured
- This is due to the fact blue light has a shorter wavelength than red light, meaning blue light is refracted more by a lens than red light
- This is because blue light has a bigger refractive index
- Consequently, different colours are brought to focus at different points
- For example, blue light focuses closer to the lens than red light, because of this greater refraction
- The result is the image has a multi-coloured blurred edges
Chromatic Aberration of a Lens
This diagram of the Moon shows a very extreme example of chromatic aberration, it is usually more subtle than this
- Chromatic aberration cannot be eliminated entirely, but it can be significantly reduced by using a second diverging lens which refracts the light in the opposite direction
- This allows the red light to be brought to the same focal point as the blue light
Correcting Chromatic Aberration
- Chromatic aberration does not happen in reflecting telescopes, because mirrors can only reflect, not refract
Spherical Aberration
- Spherical aberration is a type of image distortion which can affect both refractors and reflectors, where:
Rays of light come to focus at different points due to the spherical curvature of a lens, or mirror, causing the image to become very blurred
- The positions of the focal points depend on where the rays of light meet the lens or the mirror
- The further the ray is from the principal axis, the shorter its focal length
Ray Diagrams for Spherical Aberration
Spherical aberration can affect both lens and mirrors
- In a refracting telescope, spherical aberration cannot be eliminated entirely, but it can be reduced by using a parabolic lens
- However, there is a limit to how much this improves the image quality, as this further increases the size and weight of the lens
- Whereas, in a reflecting telescope, spherical aberration can be entirely overcome by using a parabolic mirror
Parabolic mirror
Spherical aberration is eliminated by using a parabolic mirror
Refracting Telescopes
Advantages
- Refractors require less maintenance than reflectors
- Refractors are not as sensitive to temperature changes as reflectors
Disadvantages
- Refractors are not usually the telescope of choice due to their:
1. Size
-
- It is difficult to make large-diameter glass lenses which are completely free from defects
- Large magnifications require large objective lenses and very long focal lengths
2. Weight
-
- Large-diameter lenses are heavy and tend to distort under their own weight
- Refractors are heavy and difficult to manoeuvre so they have a slower response to astronomical events
- Observing equipment and electronics must be mounted to the telescope which adds to the weight
3. Construction
-
- Lenses can only be mounted and supported around their edges however, this is where they are thinnest and weakest
4. Image quality
-
- Refractors suffer from both chromatic and spherical aberration
5. Ability to observe non-visible wavelengths
-
- Refractors are only able to observe wavelengths of visible light
Reflecting Telescopes
Advantages
- Reflectors are superior in their design because of their:
1. Size
-
- The diameter of a mirror can be much larger than that of a lens so greater magnifications can be achieved
- The arrangement of the mirrors allows reflectors to be much shorter than refractors
- Several small mirrors can be used to form a large composite objective mirror
2. Weight
-
- Large single mirrors can be made, which are light and easily supportable from behind
- Reflectors are lighter which allows for a more rapid response to astronomical events
3. Construction
-
- Mirrors only use the front surface for reflection, which eliminates many of the problems associated with lenses
- Mirror surfaces can be made very thin (a few nm) which allows for greater image detail
4. Image quality
-
- Mirrors cannot produce chromatic aberration
- Reflectors do not suffer from spherical aberration use if parabolic mirrors are used
5. Ability to observe non-visible wavelengths
-
- Reflectors can be designed to observe wavelengths of light outside of the visible spectrum
- Reflectors can be sent into space which eliminates light absorption due to the atmosphere
Disadvantages
- The secondary mirror has the disadvantage of blocking some light from entering the primary mirror
- The secondary mirror and its supports will cause some diffraction which can affect the clarity of the image
- Mirrors in a reflecting telescope are exposed to air so they require regular maintenance
- Light is refracted in the eyepiece lens and therefore some chromatic aberration may be introduced at this stage
Examiner Tip
Make sure you understand that the secondary mirror on the reflector has an effect on the clarity of the image by slightly reducing the amount of light reaching the aperture.
When comparing the two types of telescope, make sure to focus on optical differences only, factors such as cost will not gain any credit in an exam