Geopolitical Intervention in Human Rights (Edexcel A Level Geography)
Revision Note
Geopolitical Interventions in Human Rights
Human rights violations can lead to interventions by western governments, IGOs and non-governmental organisations (NGOs)
Geopolitical interventions aim to address human development and human rights issues by providing:
Development aid
Trade embargoes
Military aid
Indirect and direct military action
Some of these interventions are high risk because they involve the use of force
Types of geopolitical interventions
Geopolitical intervention | What is it? | Example |
---|---|---|
Development aid |
|
|
Trade embargo |
|
|
Military aid |
|
|
Indirect military action |
|
|
Direct military action |
|
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
‘Intervention’ is a broad term. Make sure you specify the type of intervention you are writing about in your exam answer eg. direct military action, development aid. Back these up with a range of examples, rather than a one or two long case studies.
Interventions by International Governmental Organisations
To protect human rights or promote development, geopolitical interventions can also come from:
IGOs, such as the UN, EU, World Bank and WTO
NGOs, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch
Individual countries
IGO interventions (political and economic) can include:
Putting conditions on aid or withholding aid
Imposing trade embargoes
Expressing disapproval of human right abuses
Human rights NGOs aim for peaceful interventions by:
Monitoring the status of human rights globally
Campaigning for the protection of human rights
Petitioning and lobbying of authoritarian governments e.g. to free protestors imprisoned unfairly
Encouraging IGOs and governments to intervene in human rights abuses
It can be difficult for IGOs, NGOs and nationals government to reach a consensus about the level of intervention to use as:
The organisations or countries involved have different aims e.g. increasing global influence or protecting human rights
The superpower countries could be seeking to assist and control less-powerful countries for political and economic purposes
The UN has no military force, relying on member states to provide and fund it
The intervention could be for the intervening country’s self-interest e.g. oil reserves
The risks the intervention could lead to a wider conflict
Cutting off development aid can reduce a country’s ability to support its citizens’ basic needs
Military action can lead to the injury or death of civilians
Condemnation of Human Rights Violations
Western governments, such as the USA, condemn human rights violations
They try to improve aspects of human rights in other states by:
Offering aid with attached conditions e.g. improve the education of women and girls
Negotiating trade agreements e.g lowering import tariffs
Military intervention for the most serious breaches of human rights
These interventions show a disregard for national sovereignty because one nation is interfering with the governance of another
When governments abuse citizens’ human rights (e.g. genocide, torture and imprisonment), it highlights the limitations of national sovereignty
Nations that violate the UDHR could face external interference and forfeit their sovereignty
Human rights violations create tension between national sovereignty and the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P) commitment, making it clear that the sovereignty of a country has limits
This tension was apparent in in Libya from 2011
Despite a human rights argument being used as the reason for military intervention, other nations had vested interests e.g. a desire for energy security - Libya is a major oil exporter
Worked Example
Explain why some forms of intervention may be favoured more than others.
(8 marks)
Start by outlining the idea that different types of intervention are favoured by different groups for different reasons. Briefly suggest which types of intervention are usually promoted by different groups.
Then explain why a particular group would prefer that type of intervention eg. NGOs prefer peaceful interventions
Finally, explain why another group might prefer a different type of intervention eg. Western governments using economic and military interventions
Answer:
Different types of intervention are favoured by different groups for different reasons. The different types of intervention range from peaceful interventions to economic and political interventions depending on the aims of the organisations and countries involved. Some NGOs might prefer peaceful interventions, whilst some Western governments might use economic and military interventions in the name of human rights.
Human rights NGOs (e.g. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch) often seek to avoid any human rights abuses. To avoid any unintentional impacts on civilians’ human rights, these NGOs tend to favour peaceful interventions, such as petitions to put pressure on oppressive governments. For example, Amnesty International campaigns with local NGOs in Afghanistan to try to improve education for women and girls. However, since the Taliban regained control in 2021, human rights for women have deteriorated.
Superpowers are more likely to favour military interventions in order to stop human rights abuses and protect the interests of Western powers. For example, France and the UK, directed by the UN, performed airstrikes on the Libyan government in 2011 to protect civilians. The government had killed hundreds of protestors demonstrating about government corruption and the poor economic situation in Libya. This led to the introduction of a new government, who is now in conflict with rebel groups, meaning Libya remains unstable. It is claimed that the UK’s main reason for military intervention was not human rights but to gain access to more oil reserves.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?