Differential Impacts & Tectonic Hazard Patterns (Edexcel A Level Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Bridgette Barrett
Reviewed by: Jenna Quinn
Tectonic Hazard Trends Since 1960
Global disaster trends
The number of recorded disasters has increased significantly since 1960
There are a number of reasons for this including:
Increased population - the world population has grown from 3 billion to over 8 billion since 1960
This means more people are likely to be impacted by any hazard event
Increased population density in urban and coastal areas increases the vulnerable population
Increased monitoring and reporting means more hazard events are recorded
Most of the increase has been the result of floods and extreme weather
Tectonic disaster trends
The number of tectonic disasters has fluctuated since 1960 but has generally remained steady
The slight increase in a number of earthquake disasters does not mean there have been more earthquakes or higher magnitude earthquakes. It results from:
Greater urbanisation leads to higher population densities and increased building density
Population growth means more people are living in earthquake-prone regions
Number of deaths
The number of deaths resulting from all hazards has decreased since 1960
This is the result of:
Improved building construction, design and materials
Increased monitoring
Greater preparation and planning - hazard mapping, land use zoning, evacuation planning
Education - earthquake drills
Improved warning systems
Increased development
The number of deaths from tectonic hazards fluctuates depending on a range of factors including:
Magnitude
Level of development
Location
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
The impact of a mega-disaster such as the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami may skew the overall trend because it leads to so many deaths
Volcanic eruptions are less frequent than earthquakes and deaths from eruptions are now rare due to improved monitoring, exclusion zones and evacuation plans
Economic cost trends
The economic cost of disasters has increased since 1960
As countries develop the cost of repairing infrastructure and rebuilding increases
Increased wealth means people have more possessions and property to be damaged and destroyed
Infrastructure is more sophisticated and expensive to replace, for example, electric grids
As more people are affected the cost increases
The economic impact of disasters is affected by whether the country is developing (LIC) or developed (HIC)
The economic cost in US$ tends to be higher in developed countries
The impact on the GDP tends to be much greater in developing and emerging countries
Comparison of Costs LIC Vs HIC
Event | Estimated cost (US$) | % GDP |
---|---|---|
Gorkha earthquake, Nepal (2015) | 10 billion | 33% |
Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japan (2011) | 360 billion | 4% |
Accuracy and reliability of data
The trends associated with all disasters are complex
They are affected by a wide range of factors
When disasters occur the data collected may not be accurate due to:
The focus when a disaster strikes and in the weeks that follow is on search, rescue and recovery
In remote rural areas it may be difficult to collect data
Tectonic Mega-Disasters Case Studies
Tectonic mega-disasters are high impact, high magnitude hazard events which affect several countries either directly or indirectly
Examples of mega-disasters include:
Asian tsunami (2004)
Eyjafjallajokull eruption, Iceland (2010)
Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japan (2011)
Table of Impacts
Event | Impact |
---|---|
Asian tsunami |
|
Eyjafjallajokull |
|
Tohuku earthquake and tsunami |
|
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?