Glaciated Landscape Skills (AQA A Level Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Jacque Cartwright
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Glaciated Landscape Skills
Geographical skills are working skills essential to developing a synoptic approach to answering questions but also observing the 'bigger picture' in geography
It is important to be confident with a mixture of numerical quantitative skills and qualitative written communication skills
Many of the skills are already outlined elsewhere in the revision notes
Understanding data
In data analysis, variables are the amounts that have been measured - the number of drumlins or the size of erratics
For each variable, a value is noted against each sample - drumlin a, drumlin b etc
The data set is the collection of total values and is then analysed further
The sample size and type of data, influence the choice of statistical test to use
Spearman's rank would be used to test for correlation between two variables etc.
Types of data can be grouped into:
Nominal
Ordinal
Interval
Ratio
Nominal
Also known as categorical data, its main purpose is to classify or group information
Data is organised into distinct categories, but the categories have no numerical or quantitative meaning
Examples of categories can include things such as dog, cat, blue, male and female etc.
Or they can be labelled with numerical codes such as 1 for glacial 2 for periglacial etc.
They can be summarised using percentages or frequencies e.g. 40% of periglacial pingos are open system
Remember they have no order or mathematical relationship and performing statistical analysis is pointless
Ordinal
Ordinal data is a type of data that can be ordered or ranked into categories
Examples include:
Primary school, secondary school, sixth form or college, and university
The categories show a clear progression/order on levels of possible education
Very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied
These categories show levels of satisfaction, but intervals between them may not be equal
Ordinal data allows ranking and comparing of vales, but doesn't provide information on size of the differences between the categories
Statistical analysis and interpretation can be used such as calculating median, mode, or Spearman's rank; but ordinal data doesn't allow for mathematical calculations such as adding or subtracting
Interval
Interval data is the same as ordinal data, but the intervals between the categories is constant
For example pH values of water; scale of temperature or time on a clock
Interval data is therefore, a more precise measurement compared to nominal and ordinal data, but it does not include a true zero point
Interval data allows for various statistical operations such as calculating mean, median mode, standard deviations, and conducting tests such as t and u-tests
Ratio
Unlike interval data, ratio data includes a true zero point, which allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the data
The difference between any two consecutive values is the same throughout the entire range of the data
The true zero point indicates a total absence of the value at that point
This makes ratio data the highest level of measurement in terms of precision and mathematical operations
Examples include:
Weight: an object is weighed in kilograms and grams
If a value of zero is recorded it means there was no weight to the object
Distance: the distance travelled by a glacier for one day is recorded in centimetres
A recorded value of zero indicates that the glacier travelled no distance
Ratio data allows for a wide range of mathematical operations, including addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division
Statistical analysis techniques applicable to ratio data include measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode), measures of dispersion (range, variance, standard deviation), and parametric tests
Evaluative skills
Being asked to assess the impacts or causes of a range of factors is a common exam question
When deciding if something is significant consider four things:
Time - how long will it take for a strategy or impact to take effect?
Scale - how many people will be affected?
Cost - What will the cost be and to whom?
A cost can be human or environmental - what benefits the environment may come at a cost to human activity
Rather than considering whether something is expensive or cheap, think about whether it is worth the cost because of the benefits it will create
It is important to remember that just because something is expensive that doesn’t mean it is the worst option
Ethics - Does the strategy ensure dignity for local people and other stakeholders?
This will allow for a well-rounded and substantiated argument in 9 mark and 20 mark questions
Photo analysis
This is an important observational skill
Look at the foreground, midground and background
Consider the impact of the colours
Think about what has not been included in the picture, what might be just out of frame?
Percentage and percentage change
To give the amount A as a percentage of sample B, divide A by B and multiply by 100
In 2020, 25 out of 360 homes in Catland were burgled
What is the percentage (to the nearest whole number) of homes burgled?
A percentage change shows by how much something has either increased or decreased
In 2021 only 21 houses were burgled. What is the percentage change in Catland?
There has been a decrease of 16% in the rate of burglaries in the Catland area
Remember that a positive figure shows an increase but a negative is a decrease
Mann-Whitney U test
Also known as the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, it is a nonparametric test used to compare two independent groups, population or samples to determine if there is a significant difference between their distributions
It makes no assumptions of the data being normally distributed
The test works by assigning ranks to the observations from both groups combined and considers all the values as a single pool
Then, it compares the sums of the ranks for each group
The test looks at whether the distributions of the two groups differ significantly based on the ranks
A general outline of how the Mann-Whitney U test works:
Combine the data from both groups into a single dataset
Rank the combined data, assigning a rank to each observation (identical data are given an average rank)
Then calculate the sum of the ranks for each group
Use the U statistic (the smaller of the two sums of ranks) to determine the test statistic
Compare the test statistic to the critical values in the Mann-Whitney U distribution or use a significance level to determine if the difference between the groups is statistically significant
If the p-value is below the chosen significance level (often 0.05), the test concludes that there is a significant difference between the groups
The Mann-Whitney U test does not make any specific distribution for the data and is effective in comparing ordinal or continuous variables between two independent groups
Worked Example
The following data was gathered, showing how questionnaire participants rated the quality of their service provision for two ski resorts in the Swiss Alps
Ski resort A
Ski resort B
Ratings were given on a 0 to 5 scale
Ski resort A | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ski resort B | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Combine and sort the values of both samples into numerical order
Keep a note of which sample refers to which ski resort
If there are two of the same value, put ski resort A first - it doesn't really matter so long as you are consistent
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | B | B | A | A | A | A | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
B | B | A | A | A | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
For every value for ski resort B, count how many ski resort A values comes before it in the list, then add these together to get a U₁ value
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | B | B | A | A | A | A | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 | 8 |
|
|
|
| 12 |
B | B | A | A | A | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
12 | 12 |
|
|
| 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
U₁ = 8 + 8 + 12+ 12+ 12 + 15+ 15+ 15+ 15+ 15+ 15+ 15+ 15+ 15
U₁ = 202
Now repeat the process to count how many ski resort B vales come before A in the list, add together to get U₂
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | B | B | A | A | A | A | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
B | B | A | A | A | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U₂ = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 2+ 2+ 2+ 2 + 5 + 5+ 5
U₂ = 23
Using the critical value table, you can see if this result is significant or not - a copy will be given to you in the exam
The extract below gives a critical value to 5% significance
| n2 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n1 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
| 45 | 50 | 54 | 59 |
14 |
| 50 | 55 | 59 | 64 |
15 |
| 54 | 59 | 64 | 70 |
16 |
| 59 | 64 | 70 | 75 |
The size of each sample is indicated by ?1 and ?2 (in this instance the samples size is the same for both resorts
Both ?1 and ?2 are 15, giving a critical value of 64
To determine significance, and not due to chance, the smaller U value must be equal or less than the table's critical value
In this instance, U₂ = 23 and is therefore, less than the critical value of 64
We can state with a 95% certainty that ski resort A has been rated significantly different to ski resort B by respondents of the questionnaire
To find a reason why this might be, would be the next stage in an investigation
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?