Mark Scheme And Model Answer (OCR A Level English Literature): Revision Note
Exam code: H472
Mark Scheme And Model Answer
The best way to improve any essay is to know how you are assessed, and what skills you are being assessed on. This page has been created to give you a sense of what examiners are looking for in a full-mark response. It contains:
Overview
Mark scheme
Example task
Model answer
Unannotated model answer
Overview
Component 1, Section 2 will require you to write a comparative essay that considers the contexts in which texts are both written and understood, as well as different interpretations of texts. Although the dominant assessment objective for this task is AO3, you are required to write a coherent, well-argued response that integrates your wider reading in your chosen topic area in a sophisticated way. Your response must also be supported with direct quotations or close reference to both texts.
Mark scheme
The mark scheme in English Literature is quite broad and can seem difficult to understand. This is because there is no “correct answer” for any essay: the exam board does not provide points that need to be included in any essay; instead, examiners use the mark scheme to place an answer into a level. For Section 2, AO3 is the dominant assessment objective. The weightings for the Assessment Objectives in this question are:
AO3 – 50%
AO4 – 25%
AO1 – 12.5%
AO5 – 12.5%
In simple terms, to achieve the highest marks (Level 6 = 26–30 marks), this means:
AO3 |
|
AO4 |
|
AO1 |
|
AO5 |
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Although there are four specific assessment objectives assessed in this task, it is not the case that a certain number of marks are awarded for any one objective. Instead, the examiners are looking for a well-constructed and coherent essay that seamlessly combines an exploration of relevant contexts with a well-structured comparative analysis, which should also involve linking to your wider reading in your chosen topic area.
Example task
The following task is taken from the June 2022 paper and is based on the texts Paradise Lost and The Duchess of Malfi. However, the commentary is designed to highlight how to structure your response and integrate all aspects of the assessment objectives, and therefore the model could be applied to any of the other texts. For candidate exemplars from this exam series for the other texts, please follow this link (opens in a new tab) to the resources available on OCR’s website.
We will now explore how you can create an informed and coherent argument using an example of a question from Section 2. Read through the question below:
Question: “Powerful emotions are often the excuse for unacceptable behaviour.” In the light of this view, consider ways in which writers explore the connection between intense thoughts and bad deeds. In your answer, compare one drama text and one poetry text. |
You can develop your argument by linking your points.
Consider the proposition about the texts you are studying:
“Powerful emotions are often the excuse for unacceptable behaviour.”
In light of the proposition, choose two texts that compare well with one another (AO4)
Next come up with a personal and creative response to the proposition:
This is how you display mastery of AO1
Consider the influence of the contexts in which the texts were written and received and how these might impact on the texts (AO3):
The emphasis on context can also enable you to write about popular contemporary issues of particular interest to you
Then inform or support your answer (this is also how you hit AO1) with a reference to different interpretations (AO5)
After you have done this, start with an alternative personal and creative response to the proposition
We will now explore how you might structure this into a response. To begin with, you should consider how you might support or challenge this proposition. This is shown in the table below:
Proposition | “Powerful emotions are often the excuse for unacceptable behaviour.” |
Topic sentence 1 | Both Milton and Webster explore powerful emotions and themes such as pride and ambition but in different ways. |
Sub point | Milton's focus is deeply rooted in religious doctrines, which reflect his theological beliefs; in contrast, Webster's exploration is more focused on the political and social dynamics of the Jacobean era, although the play still addresses moral and ethical questions. |
Sub point | Milton's exploration is deeply rooted within the context of the Christian faith. His portrayal of Satan's pride serves as a reflection of the Biblical narrative of Lucifer's rebellion against God. |
Sub point | Satan's ambition to overthrow God and his subsequent fall from grace are emblematic of the concept of hubris in Christian theology, which underscores the grave consequences of defiance against divine authority. |
Comparative topic sentence | In contrast, Webster explores the themes of pride and ambition within the specific socio-political context of the Jacobean era. |
Sub point | While the play does not have the same explicit religious backdrop as Paradise Lost, it still reflects the moral and ethical dilemmas within a society marked by patriarchal norms and social hierarchies. |
Sub point | The characters' ambitions and desires are set against the rigid class structure and societal expectations, where ambition, especially when exhibited by a woman, is often viewed as a threat to the established order. |
Sub point | The characters' ambitions and desires are set against the rigid class structure and societal expectations, where ambition, especially when exhibited by a woman, is often viewed as a threat to the established order. |
Sub point | The consequences of the characters' pride and ambition are therefore primarily social and personal and this reflects the power struggles and moral ambiguities of Jacobean society. |
Another way to develop your argument is, after dealing comprehensively with one point about both texts, to start another paragraph that also relates to the question:
Proposition | “Powerful emotions are often the excuse for unacceptable behaviour.” |
Topic sentence 2 | Both the Duchess and Eve challenge societal norms and expectations imposed upon them through what could be viewed as their “unacceptable behaviour”. |
Sub point | The Duchess marries Antonio, defying her brothers' authority and societal conventions, while Eve disobeys God's command by eating the forbidden fruit, which challenges divine authority and the established order in Paradise. |
Sub point | The Duchess of Malfi is set in a world where repressed emotions drive the Duchess and her low-born husband to conventionally “unacceptable” behaviour. |
Sub point | The Duchess, being of noble birth, is expected to conform to strict social norms and marry within her social class. The Duchess's defiance is driven by her quest for personal happiness and love in her relationships. |
Comparative topic sentence | In contrast, Eve's disobedience could be perceived as being motivated by curiosity, her ambition for knowledge and her desire to be equal to God in wisdom. |
Sub point | This demonstrates her pursuit of intellectual and spiritual autonomy. Created by God and placed in the idyllic Garden of Eden, Eve's curiosity and desire for wisdom lead her to the Tree of Knowledge. |
Sub point | Unlike the Duchess, Eve's pursuit is not primarily rooted in emotional fulfilment but in intellectual curiosity and a desire for enlightenment. |
Sub point | Eve seeks autonomy from God's limitations and rules and aspires to transcend her initial state of innocence and gain a deeper understanding of the world. |
Model Answer
Below you will find a full-mark, A* model answer for this task. The commentary labelled in each section of the essay illustrates how and why it would be awarded an A*. Despite the fact it is an answer to Paradise Lost and The Duchess of Malfi, the commentary is relevant to any of the other texts, because it is modelling how to structure an answer incorporating the relevant assessment objectives. AO1 is demonstrated throughout in terms of the coherence of the overall response.






Unannotated model answer
Both Milton and Webster explore powerful emotions and themes such as pride and ambition but in different ways. Milton's focus is deeply rooted in religious doctrines, which reflect his theological beliefs; in contrast, Webster's exploration is more focused on the political and social dynamics of the Jacobean era, although the play still addresses moral and ethical questions. Ultimately, both authors suggest that powerful emotions like love, ambition and jealousy can lead characters to exhibit behaviour that – in their respective contexts – can be seen as morally “unacceptable”. Milton's exploration is deeply rooted in the context of the Christian faith. For example, his portrayal of Satan's pride serves as a reflection of the Biblical narrative of Lucifer's rebellion against God. Satan's ambition to overthrow God and his subsequent fall from grace are emblematic of the concept of hubris in Christian theology, which underscores the grave consequences of defiance against divine authority. In contrast, Webster explores the themes of pride and ambition within the specific socio-political context of the Jacobean era. While the play does not have the same explicit religious backdrop as Paradise Lost, it still reflects the moral and ethical dilemmas within a society deeply entrenched in patriarchal norms and social hierarchies. The characters' ambitions and intense emotions and desires are therefore set against the rigid class structure and societal expectations, where ambition, particularly when exhibited by a woman, is often viewed as a threat to the established order. Thus, the consequences of the characters' pride and ambition are primarily social and personal and this reflects the power struggles and moral ambiguities of Jacobean society. Both the Duchess and Eve challenge societal norms and expectations imposed upon them through what could be viewed as their “unacceptable behaviour”. The Duchess marries Antonio, defying her brothers' authority and societal conventions, while Eve disobeys God's command by eating the forbidden fruit, which challenges divine authority and the established order in Paradise. The Duchess of Malfi is set in a world where repressed emotions drive the Duchess and her low-born husband to conventionally “unacceptable” behaviour. The Duchess, being of noble birth, is expected to conform to strict social norms and marry within her social class. However, her repressed emotions, particularly her desire for true love and autonomy, lead her to defy these conventions. This is evidenced in her declaration: “The misery of us that are born great! ...so we are forced to express our violent passions”. In this quotation, the Duchess laments the constraints placed upon her as a woman of noble birth and she expresses the anguish of being forced to conceal her true feelings and desires due to societal expectations. The critic R.S. White explores the theme of repression and the Duchess's defiance of societal norms and suggests her actions are a form of rebellion against the stifling restrictions placed upon her by her status and gender. White interprets the Duchess's decision to marry Antonio as a courageous act of expressing her repressed emotions and asserting her own autonomy. The Duchess's defiance of her brothers' authority and her pursuit of a relationship with Antonio challenges these norms, making her behaviour highly unconventional and unacceptable within the patriarchal framework of the time. Her defiance is thus driven by her desire for personal happiness and love in her relationship. In contrast, Eve's disobedience could be perceived as being motivated by curiosity, her ambition for knowledge and also her desire to be equal to God in wisdom. This demonstrates her pursuit of intellectual and spiritual autonomy. Having been created by God and placed in the idyllic Garden of Eden, Eve's curiosity and desire for wisdom lead her to the Tree of Knowledge. Unlike the Duchess, Eve's pursuit is not primarily rooted in emotional fulfilment but in intellectual curiosity: Eve seeks autonomy from God's limitations and rules and aspires to transcend her initial state of innocence and gain a deeper understanding of the world. As Eve states: “to compare / With that which, sooner or with later, he / Spare the sin of disobedience, that his God / Impair'd not, but favour'd oft the skill/ Of brutes and hunger, thirst, and outward sense, / If aught might else be sought”. In these lines, Eve contemplates the possibility of gaining knowledge and wisdom that could elevate her to a status equal to God's. This conveys her ambition and intense curiosity, which subsequently lead to her disobedient actions. Further, Milton's portrayal of Eve as the temptress and the cause of humanity's downfall could be perceived as a reflection of the prevailing misogyny of his era. Eve's curiosity and desire for knowledge, which could be viewed as admirable traits in a more modern context, would have been condemned in the context of disobedience to God's command. Milton's society would have interpreted Eve's actions as a warning against the dangers of these intense emotions and this would have reinforced the importance of obedience and submission to divine authority. Further, in relation to the Duchess’s and Eve’s actions, both characters respond differently. The Duchess remains steadfast in her love for Antonio and faces her fate with dignity and accepts responsibility for her choices. Eve, on the other hand, acknowledges her guilt and repents and seeks redemption, which demonstrates a complex mix of both remorse and accountability. Within the theological context of the 17th century, obedience to God was paramount. God's command to abstain from eating the forbidden fruit represented a test of Adam and Eve's obedience and faith. However, Adam's decision to prioritise his intense love for Eve over his obedience to God's command could be viewed as a moral failure within the social and historical context of the poem. His love leads to an act of disobedience and directly challenges the divine authority, which disrupts the natural order established by God. His love and admiration for Eve is evidenced through the lines: “O fairest of creation, last and best / Of all God's works, creature in whom excelled” conveys Eve’s beauty and divine qualities. Despite his awareness of God's command, Adam's intense love for Eve leads him to eat the forbidden fruit, which marks the moment of humanity's Fall. Critic Stanley Fish suggests that Adam's love for Eve, which is portrayed as a powerful and overwhelming emotion, becomes the driving force behind his decision to eat the forbidden fruit. Fish argues that Milton deliberately portrays Adam's love for Eve as a form of idolatry, placing his affection for her above his devotion to God's command. It therefore demonstrates the consequences of prioritising earthly love over divine obedience. Both The Duchess of Malfi and Paradise Lost depict how intense emotions can lead characters to engage in morally unacceptable behaviour. Whether driven by love, jealousy, pride or ambition, these intense emotions lead to tragic outcomes. While the contexts and motivations differ in these two texts, the underlying theme remains consistent: powerful emotions can serve as excuses for individuals to justify their actions, even when those actions are ultimately destructive and morally reprehensible. |
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?