Regulating the Financial System (AQA A Level Economics)
Revision Note
Written by: Lorraine
Reviewed by: Steve Vorster
Regulation of the UK Financial System
Historically, a lack of regulation of financial activities has led to risky loans, poor investments, and banking losses
In response, the Bank of England has increased its supervision and regulation of financial institutions to provide financial stability and a degree of protection for depositors and borrowers
The following regulatory bodies were set up to oversee the financial system in the UK:
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC)
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Role of Regulatory Bodies in the UK
|
|
---|---|
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) |
|
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) |
|
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) |
|
Reasons why Banks Fail
The Financial Crisis of 2008 highlighted fragility of the financial system
Governments had to step in to save individual banks from failure (e.g. RBS)
Reasons that Banks Fail
|
|
---|---|
High-risk loans |
|
Regulation violation |
|
Speculation & market bubbles |
|
Asymmetric information |
|
Liquidity & Capital Ratio
The financial crisis of 2007, highlighted the need to regulate excessive risk-taking by financial institutions and banks
Banks are now required to meet capital and liquidity ratios to evaluate their capacity to manage unexpected shocks
Liquidity ratio
The liquidity ratio is the ratio of a bank’s cash and other liquid assets to its deposits
This ratio measures a bank's ability to meet its short-term obligations and cash needs. It assesses a a bank's liquidity by comparing liquid assets to its short-term liabilities
Capital ratio
The capital ratio is the amount of capital on a bank’s balance sheet as a proportion of its loans
It measures the funds it holds from profits and issuing shares
The aim is to identify the level of risk associated with lending
Moral Hazard
Moral Hazard has increased in the financial sector since 2008 as Governments have stepped in to save individual banks from failure (e.g. RBS)
Banks seem to be considered 'too big to fail' and governments bear the consequences of their risky behaviour
The financial sector returned to questionable practices within two years: The China Hustle documents how investment funds and stockbrokers played up obscure Chinese companies who presented fake financial data
This stimulated investor demand, temporarily pushing up prices. Many investors lost a lot of money
Systemic Risk in Financial Markets
Systematic failure is when a minor local problem in one country’s financial sector has international consequences
A single bank can trigger the breakdown of an entire market or even the entire financial system
Banks may collapse following periods of low interest rates, accessible credit, and excessive speculation
This may cause a sudden and steep decline in asset prices (e.g., shares or housing) leading to a default on loans
This could rapidly escalate into a much more severe international situation
In 2007, French bank BNP Paribas informed depositors that they could not withdraw from two of their funds. The value of the assets in those fund could not be determined
Banks then stopped transactions with each other as they could not trust that borrowing could be returned. This caused a freeze in liquidity and led to a sudden increase in interest rates
As a result of this and other causes of the credit crunch, banks collapsed. This triggered a global financial crisis and recession
In some cases, the government and central bank intervened. This helped avert an overall systemic failure, but significant economic harm occurred
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?