Conflicts Between the Macroeconomic Objectives (AQA A Level Economics)
Revision Note
Written by: Lorraine
Reviewed by: Steve Vorster
How Output Gaps Relate to Unemployment & Inflation
Understanding the relationship between output gaps, unemployment, and inflation is crucial for policymakers
Reducing a negative output gap by stimulating demand may lead to lower unemployment but could also contribute to inflation
Conversely, efforts to cool down an overheating economy with a positive output gap might reduce inflation but could result in higher unemployment
Relationship Between Output gaps & Unemployment / Inflationary Pressures
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Low unemployment |
|
|
Low and stable inflation |
|
|
The Short Run Phillips Curve
The Short-run Phillips Curve (SRPC) observes that there may be a trade-off between unemployment and inflation
Rising inflation is often accompanied by falling unemployment
Rising unemployment is often accompanied by falling inflation
This trade-off makes it difficult for the government to achieve both low unemployment and low inflation
Diagram: The Short-run Phillips Curve
Diagram analysis
The economy is initially in equilibrium at AP1YFE
At this point, unemployment is at 4% and inflation is at 3% and this is considered to be full employment (YFE)
There is always some unemployment due to the frictional and structural unemployment that exists
An increase in AD from AD1→AD2 causes a positive output gap (YFE - Y2)
With an increase in output the demand for labour rises and unemployment falls from 4% → 3%
The remaining labour in the market is scarcer and workers are able to negotiate higher wages
This causes wage inflation in the economy
Wage inflation leads to an increase in inflation from 3% → 4%
A decrease in AD from AD1 → AD3 causes a negative output gap (YFE - Y3)
With a decrease in output, the demand for labour falls and unemployment rises from 4% → 5%
Labour is more abundant, and to get hired workers have to accept lower wages
This causes wage deflation in the economy
Wage deflation leads to a decrease in inflation from 3% → 2%
The Long Run Phillips Curve
The long-run Phillips curve (LRPC) suggests there is no trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the long run
The curve is based on the idea of a natural rate of unemployment (NRU)
This is the unemployment rate that prevails when the economy is operating at its full potential
It represents the level of unemployment consistent with non-accelerating inflation, meaning that further reductions in the unemployment rate cannot be achieved without generating inflationary pressures
The LRPC is vertical at the natural rate of unemployment
In the long-run, the short-run Phillips curve moves around the vertical long run curve as the labour market self corrects in the long run
In the long-run wages and prices are flexible
Diagram: SRPC Self Correction to LRPC
Diagram analysis
The NRU of 4.5% represents the LRPC
in the short-run, AD has increased causing a leftward movement along the SRPC from point A → B (higher inflation and lower unemployment)
In the long-run, the economy will move from point B to C as following the increase in AD, workers see their real wages fall and so eventually demand higher wages
In response, firms reduce employment and raise prices, returning unemployment to its natural rate (NRU), now at a higher inflation rate
If there has been deflation in the economy, workers will accept lower wages in the long-run and employment and output will return to the full-employment level
The Implications of the Phillips Curve for Economic Policy
The implications for short-run policy decisions
Governments have to accept trade-offs in the macroeconomic objectives
Achieving one objective may come at the cost of worsening progress in another objective
Increasing economic growth causes the economy to move closer to full employment
However, prices for remaining resources are bid up leading to inflation which may outpace the target inflation rate of 2%
An Explanation of the Common Trade-offs that Exist Between the Macroeconomic Objectives
|
|
---|---|
High economic growth and inflation |
|
|
|
|
|
Low unemployment and low inflation |
|
The implications for long-run policy decisions
LRPC suggests that there is no permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment over an extended period
In the long run, the economy tends to return to its natural or potential level of output
Policymakers should not use demand side policies (monetary/fiscal) to permanently reduce unemployment below its natural rate.
Attempts to do so may lead to higher inflation without sustaining lower unemployment
Instead, policymakers should consider supply-side policies, such as education and training programs, labour market reforms, and measures that enhance productivity and efficiency
Examiner Tips and Tricks
If you are asked to explain a particular trade off, make sure you explain all of the steps in the process E.g. if economic growth increases too quickly, there is likely to be demand-pull inflation, which raises the cost of living for the citizens, resulting in them feeling poorer, as the purchasing power of their wage has decreased
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?