Predicting Feasibility of Redox Reactions (CIE A Level Chemistry)

Revision Note

Richard

Author

Richard

Last updated

Feasibility of Redox Reactions Using Standard Electrode Values

  • Transition elements can form ions with various oxidation states
  • The change in their oxidation states involves the transfer of electrons
  • Transition elements are often involved in redox reactions
  • A redox reaction is a reaction in which one species is oxidised (loses electrons) and another is reduced (gains electrons)
  • The standard electrode potentials (Eθ) of the two species can be used to predict the feasibility of redox reactions involving transition elements and their ions

Predicting the feasibility of redox reactions

  • The standard electrode potential (Eθ) of a species gives an indication of how well it can be reduced
  • In the exam, you will be provided with a half equation and the standard electrode potential (Eθ)
  • The half equations are always written as a reduction equation
    • They are equilibrium reactions, as they demonstrate the equilibrium reached when the species in the equation gains electrons at the same rate as it loses electrons
  • The more positive the standard electrode potential (Eθ) of a species is, the more readily that element will be reduced (gain electrons)
    • This is always when compared to the standard hydrogen electrode
    • The opposite is of course true; the more negative the standard electrode potential (Eθ) of a species is, the more readily that element will be oxidised (lose electrons)
  • The feasibility of a reaction can be predicted using these values
  • For example, the feasibility of Fe3+ being reduced to Fe2+ when reacted with Cu2+ can be predicted using their standard electrode potentials

Standard electrode potentials of Fe(III) & Cu(II) table

Half equation Standard electrode potential, Eθ (V)
Fe3+ + e begin mathsize 16px style rightwards harpoon over leftwards harpoon end style Fe2+ +0.77
Cu2+ + e rightwards harpoon over leftwards harpoon Cu+ +0.15

  • The table above shows that yes, the reaction is feasible and Fe3+ is more likely to get reduced to Fe2+
    • Fe3+ has a more positive standard electrode potential
    • Fe3+ will gain electrons more readily than Cu2+
    • Therefore, Fe3+ is the better oxidising agent
    • The reaction for this half equation will therefore proceed in the forward direction (reduction)

Fe3+ + e rightwards harpoon over leftwards harpoon Fe2+    Eθ = +0.77 V

  • Since it is feasible that the Fe3+ will be reduced and this half equation will move in the forward direction, this means that the half equation for copper will move in the backward direction (oxidation)
    • Cu2+ equation has a less positive (or more negative) standard electrode potential
    • The Cu+ will therefore be oxidised to Cu2+
    • The reaction for this half equation will therefore be in the reverse direction

Cu2+ + e  rightwards harpoon over leftwards harpoon Cu+    Eθ = +0.15 V

  • Combining these two half-equations to get the overall equation gives (after cancelling the electrons on both sides):

Fe3+ + Cu+ rightwards harpoon over leftwards harpoon Fe2+ + Cu2+

  • The standard cell potential is:
    • Eθ = EθreductionEθoxidation 
    • Eθ = (+0.77) – (+0.15) 
    • Eθ = +0.62 V
  • The positive value of Ecellθ (+0.62 V) suggests that the reaction is likely to proceed
  • The changes in the transition element ions’ oxidation states are therefore feasible
  • Standard electrode potentials (Eθ) are only predictions about the feasibility of a reaction; they do not guarantee that a reaction will definitely occur
    • For example, a reaction may be feasible according to these rules but have a very large activation energy barrier meaning that, in reality, it will not occur

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Richard

Author: Richard

Expertise: Chemistry

Richard has taught Chemistry for over 15 years as well as working as a science tutor, examiner, content creator and author. He wasn’t the greatest at exams and only discovered how to revise in his final year at university. That knowledge made him want to help students learn how to revise, challenge them to think about what they actually know and hopefully succeed; so here he is, happily, at SME.